similar to: [Bug 1192] warning: comparison between signed and unsigned

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1192 Summary: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.3p2 Platform: amd64 URL: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi- bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/ssh/scp.c.diff?r1=1.121&r2=1.122& f=h OS/Version: All

Greetings, Attached patch "fixes" the following warning while compiling with gcc 3.4.5, openssh 4.3p2 in an AMD64 Linux system, which is triggered by the comparison between off_t (signed long) and size_t (unsigned long) as shown : scp.c: In function `source': scp.c:632: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned scp.c:639: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned I am

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=926 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #1216|0 |1 is obsolete| |

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=859 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtucker at zip.com.au Blocks| |1452 --- Comment #4 from Darren Tucker

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1241 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|1452 |1560 --- Comment #7 from Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> 2009-07-31 10:12:10 --- OK, well

That doesn't seem to be the case. See https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-57pt1r4.pdf (5.6.1 Comparable Algorithm Strengths) On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 8:28 AM Darren Tucker <dtucker at dtucker.net> wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 at 16:00, Yegor Ievlev <koops1997 at gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't think there is any point to generate so

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1448 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtucker at zip.com.au --- Comment #4 from Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> --- whatever it is, it

I don't think there is any point to generate so many moduli. Actually, 3 moduli of sizes 2048, 3072 and 4096 seem like a sane choice. On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 7:58 AM Darren Tucker <dtucker at dtucker.net> wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 at 14:22, Yegor Ievlev <koops1997 at gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm not nearly knowledgeable enough in crypto to fully understand your

The following patch appears to fix the BUS error received on Solaris 8. This problem manifests as an immediate disconnect with no apparent cause immediately after authentication with the host. --- Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> wrote: > Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:35:26 +1000 > From: Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> > Subject: Re: Bus Error with OpenSSH 3.7.1p2 on

On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 12:52 AM, Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> wrote: [...] >> Seems can't. But why? 7.2 does. > > Dunno, I can't think of any obvious changes to compiler flags. Maybe > try it without setting CFLAGS? OK, I think I see why it started in 7.3: it was when the wide character support was added. In configure.ac: dnl Wide character support. Linux

Darren, I went to install zlib/openssl and openssh on one of my Sun Servers(Solaris 2.7) and they would not install. Is there a website where I can get Sun versions of these products? Thanks, Lou -----Original Message----- From: Darren Tucker [mailto:dtucker at zip.com.au] Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2003 9:35 PM To: Pacelli, Louis M, ALABS Cc: OpenSSH Devel List Subject: Re: zlib missing when

On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 03:36, Philip Prindeville <philipp_subx at redfish-solutions.com> wrote: > > On Apr 10, 2023, at 7:24 AM, Darren Tucker <dtucker at dtucker.net> wrote: [...] > > Since you're using 9.1, the message could be an "Invalid free", since > > there was a double-free bug in that release :-( > > Forgot to ask: does this bug manifest

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1917 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtucker at zip.com.au --- Comment #10 from Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> --- Created attachment

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #1429| |ok? Flag| | --- Comment #7 from Darren Tucker <dtucker at

Darren, Thanks, evidently I need to practice my reading skills. I did some practice on the style guide, and I believe that I have the patch fixed up per the style guidelines. I've attached the new patch to this email for review. Cheers, Ethan On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Ethan Rahn <ethan.rahn at

Ben, Thanks for the tip! I've added the patch to Bug 2705 on bugzilla. Cheers, Ethan On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Ben Lindstrom <mouring at offwriting.org> wrote: > > The mailinglist strips out attachments. So either you need to add it to > the bug or post it in-line to the email. > > Ben > > Ethan Rahn wrote: > > Darren, > > Thanks, evidently I

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 09:13:22AM +1100, Darren Tucker wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 09:04:57AM +1100, Darren Tucker wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:11:16PM -0800, Kevin Brott wrote: > > > > ld: Unsatisfied symbol "xstrdup" in file > > > >

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:28:52AM +1100, Darren Tucker wrote: [...] > so yeah, ssh-keygen should have probably errored out "unsupported key type". diff --git a/sshkey.c b/sshkey.c index 4768790..f45e239 100644 --- a/sshkey.c +++ b/sshkey.c @@ -89,7 +89,9 @@ static const struct keytype keytypes[] = { { "ssh-ed25519-cert-v01 at openssh.com", "ED25519-CERT",

On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 at 09:07, Lionel Cons <lionelcons1972 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 at 07:07, Ron Frederick <ronf at timeheart.net> wrote: > > > > On Apr 3, 2025, at 6:02?PM, Darren Tucker <dtucker at dtucker.net> wrote: > [...] > > > Damien pointed out that it's possible to do a reasonable but not > perfect sparse file support by

On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 at 03:51, Val Baranov <val.baranov at duke.edu> wrote: > On Tuesday, February 18, 2020 8:31 PM Darren Tucker wrote: [...] > Daren, This is definitely ver. 8.2 - my apologies, but the output provided from session > where " libressl-api-compat.c " was substituted with the older version in attempts to find > out if this may have any difference. What