similar to: [Bug 1310] chmod sftp command and setgid/setuid bit

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "[Bug 1310] chmod sftp command and setgid/setuid bit"

2007 Apr 24
2
chmod sftp command and setgid/setuid bit
Hi OpenSSH developers, I'm using OpenSSH on a daily basis and I'm very pleased with the work you've done. I am contributing to some Open Source software hosted at Savannah https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/tsp and we recently hit some sftp unexpected behavior: https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?105838 when using chmod sftp client command it appears that setuid / setgid bits are
2005 Jul 06
1
setuid/setgid bits
version: rsync v2.6.1 (+ a minor, unrelated patch). I'm rsyncing files (not as root) and am happy (indeed, for what I want, delighted) that the files at the target side end up owned by the account doing the rsync. However, I've found that if I have a setuid/setgid file on the source side, the target file ends up setuid/setgid too (but under a different id!). This happens whether
2020 Jul 31
0
[Bug 934] Traverse-only directories (e.g. chmod 110) break the cd command in sftp
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=934 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |djm at mindrot.org Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution|---
2002 Jul 19
0
strip setuid/setgid bits on backup (was Re: small security-related rsync extension)
I think this is more a philosophical issue. Some people want all applications to be like windows. "Are you sure you want to delete this file" <YES> "really"<yes>"it might make something stop working<yes>"permission denied". Unix assumes you know what you're doing. If you don't, tough. There's no reason you can't make a
2002 Jul 19
1
strip setuid/setgid bits on backup (was Re: small security-related rsync extension)
On Fri, 19 Jul 2002, Dan Stromberg wrote: > Many apologies. If we update on the nfs server, as we've intended all > along, we should have no .nfs* files. Well, here's one thing that could make them, even if they're being created only directly, not over NFS. I'm watching the directory you're syncing into. I open the file while it's still there. You delete it, and
2002 Jul 09
1
strip setuid/setgid bits on backup (was Re: small security-related rsync extension)
> > > never seen a file created with a newline in the filename > > (except, perhaps as a test). The newline in filename issue > > And in security exploits :-) Given a newline-based format, one *must* > quote or deny newlines in filenames, not assume they're rare. (No > obvious reason not to use URL-style %-quoting, or mime-style > =-quoting, if you want to
2002 Jul 09
1
strip setuid/setgid bits on backup (was Re: small security-related rsync extension)
> > This brings up an issue that I believe can be solved in a simpler way than > > with brute force C code. I suspect some of you will cringe when you hear > > this, but a taintperl log parsing program would be best for this. rsync > > could generate a verbose log file that is not human readable, designed to > > be read by a perl postprocessing script. I think this
2002 Jul 09
1
strip setuid/setgid bits on backup (was Re: small security-related rsync extension)
I vote for the consistent, complete log format as a solution to this sort of thing, and those who need to take non-rsync related actions based on what rsync did can write their own applications to do so. People keep coming up with some particular thing they need done for their own application, and want rsync to do that too. rsync is a tool to make one thing exactly like another. It is not
2011 Apr 21
7
[Bug 1893] New: change ssh-keisign to setgid from setuid
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1893 Summary: change ssh-keisign to setgid from setuid Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.8p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2009 Nov 13
0
Dovecot setuid, setgid, permission denied Problem!
Hello! Please, help! I have trouble with Dovecot's Deliver utility. I don't know how to avoid errors. Let me know what additional related information do you need? 1) Its call in Exim's configure: ========================================== local_delivery_spam_transport: driver = pipe command = /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver -c
2005 Jan 20
2
Bug#291395: logcheck-database: Rules dirs are setuid, they should be setgid
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.33 Severity: normal I just installed 1.2.33, and it made my rules dirs setuid, not setgid... - Marc -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of
2004 Dec 06
2
[Bug 934] Traverse-only directories (e.g. chmod 110) break the cd command in sftp
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=934 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|sftp-server |sftp Version|3.6.1p2 |-current ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2004-12-06 17:13
2008 Jun 12
2
[Bug 200] readline support for sftp
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |djm at mindrot.org Blocks| |1452 --- Comment #7 from Damien Miller
2010 Feb 12
2
Setuid bit always set on Vista mount
Files on my Vista mount always have the S mode (setgid bit?) set according to ls -l. This is a security hole and causes other problems. I can't clear the bit with chmod; in fact the results of doing chmod don't make any sense to me (I'll be glad to provide examples). Typical files show as -rwxrwSrwx, though not all. The smb.conf file has create mask 0666 and directory mask 0777 various
2007 Apr 26
0
[Bug 1176] Cannot set sticky bits via sftp
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1176 frederik.deweerdt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Comment #2 from frederik.deweerdt at gmail.com
2018 Jan 30
1
Samba 4.6.2 does not inherit setgid bit (anymore)
Hi Vincent, have you found a solution that makes "force directory mode = 2770" able to apply to new created folders ? I have a similar problem: if I set by hand (eg. chmod 2770) the folder A and then I try to create an X element into that folder through samba I get the result needed ( group of X become overriden from parent folder A ) but the problem is that the new element X not
2018 Apr 16
0
File system permissions - setgid bit and Netapp NFS volumes
On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 09:53:00 -0700 Shaun Johnson <shaun at linuxmagic.com> wrote: > Greetings Dovecot List, > > I have a bit of an edge case I am trying to resolve. I am currently > using dovecot on Ubuntu 14.04 - Ubuntu package version: > > 1:2.2.9-1ubuntu2.3 > > I have attached the output of doveconf -n to this email - but to > describe the configuration
2018 Jan 15
0
Samba 4.6.2 does not inherit setgid bit (anymore)
Somewhere between Samba 4.2.10 and 4.6.2 (came with CentOS 7 updates) the setgid bit is not inherited anymore when making directories via my Samba service. Everything else is still fine. With ssh direct on the file system or sftp, i get all permissions and acls inherited nicely. Also with Samba all acls are still just fine, except that setgid bit is not inherited (s on the group executable
2018 Mar 23
2
File system permissions - setgid bit and Netapp NFS volumes
Greetings Dovecot List, I have a bit of an edge case I am trying to resolve. I am currently using dovecot on Ubuntu 14.04 - Ubuntu package version: 1:2.2.9-1ubuntu2.3 I have attached the output of doveconf -n to this email - but to describe the configuration in a nutshell: my server is configured to use Maildir storage I do not use dovecot delivery service (there is a separate
2006 Sep 30
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4138] New: Incoming chmod can't override inherited directory setgid
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4138 Summary: Incoming chmod can't override inherited directory setgid Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: