similar to: [Bug 1436] New: scp -p does not preserve sticky bit (01000)

Hello, I have two little problems with samba: 1st. Samba is not setting the sticky bit anymore !!! I have a share that look like this: [publico] comment = Arquivos publicos path = /home/publicos public = yes writable = yes force directory mode = 1777 create mask = 0664 With samba 1.9.x it was ok, the directories was being created with the correct permission (drwxrwxrwt), but since I

Hello, I've just tested a share configuration like the following and it did not work as I've expected it. Maybe someone can explain me what I'm doing wrong. [Marktplatz] path = /marktplatz msdfs root = no writeable = yes browseable = yes public = no dos filemode = no hide unreadable = no create mode = 0644 directory mode = 1777 force create mode = 0644 force directory mode = 1777

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11027 Bug ID: 11027 Summary: Sticky bit not set when using --chmod=D+t alone, without --perms Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee:

I'm fond of the "-a" (archive) option of cp, and I'm a heavy user of scp, so I guess it's inevitable that I would eventually add support for "-a" to scp. :-) Actually, it's a "-L" flag for preserving symlinks, and a "-a" flag that is shorthand for "-Lpr". Please let me know if I'm not doing this right.... I made a great

I noticed after my install that the tmp directory was A- not a sticky B- still executable I went and changed etc/fstab to add loop,noexec,nosuid,rw, which I hope is the right thing to do. I rebooted and it looks like it worked. When doing an ls -l on the main directory, the tmp folder lit up all green in putty (cool, I hope) But the chmods I did with winscp will not take effect (they do on

I'm posting again in the hope that someone help me, thanks. ------------------------------------- Hello, I have two little problems with samba: 1st. Samba is not setting the sticky bit anymore !!! I have a share that look like this: [publico] comment = Arquivos publicos path = /home/publicos public = yes writable = yes force directory mode = 1777 create mask = 0664 With samba

Under Aix directories have the mode 024xxxx instead of the customary 04xxxx. Because of this when you sync a directory to or from an Aix system it's never up to date. Here is a patch which fixes this. It causes rsync to look at only the bits that chmod actually influences, 07777, when deciding whether or not the modes differ. I was surprised there wasn't an existing constant for 07777,

Hi everyone, One thing that has always annoyed me about compiz is how rotate handles sticky windows. If you have a sticky window on your desktop, it will usually (always?) get focus when you rotate to a different face on the cube. This happens even when other windows have been focused more recently on the face you rotate to. This seems like silly behaviour, because sticky windows are (for me)

Hi, I have an Ubuntu Linux server where I use Sticky Bits to help enforce specific permissions on Samba shares: -- Each Samba share is associated with a unique Linux group -- Only members of the group can access the share -- All members of the group can create new files and directories in the share -- SGID is set on all directories. -- The "creator" of any new file will be the

I've attached the patch since I don't yet have an easy way to make git format-patch and kmail play nice together. The basic idea is during a rotate/other cube transform, 'sticky' windows stick to the screen instead of being redrawn once per face (its an option, the default is the old behaviour) Consider this, please, essentially an RFC - this particular behaviour was

I have a question about samba and sticky bits. I have a share with the following configuration: [documents] comment = documents path = /shares/documents public = no writeable = yes printable = no valid users = @lan1 force user = docadmin force group = lan1 create mode = 0440 force create mode = 0440 directory mode = 1770 force directory mode = 1770 delete read only = no

Hello, I currently try to copy a directory locally between two ext4 filesystems while preserving permissions and ACLs using the -aAX options. Under some conditions, rsync does not copy the posix permissions completely, it changes the group::rwx to a group::--- permission. The latest rsync available on Debian Jessie is 3.1.1, but the changelog for 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 did not seem to mention such a bug

Hi, am running: Redhat EL4.4 i386, Samba 3.0.23d from Sernet, ext3 fs Samba as PDC Someone's got the idea to have one big share with access managed by directory's sticky bit. This works perfectly well when normal XP or W2k clients work with their explorer. But: With 'allway sync', an app to synchronize for example between laptop and fileserver the program is somehow able to

Lo folks, I got a little question. Ive set up samba 3.0.0 + RH 8. And since ACL within samba only works on share niveau i wanted to implement POSIX ACL. I was thinking what is the difference between "full" access and "change" on a NT4 server. As far as i could think the difference is that "full" acces can delete a file and "change" can only change it. So i

Is there a way to provide "sticky" options to ActiveRecord::Base::Find ? I''m thinking something with a use model like: class Function < ActiveRecord::Base sticky :conditions => "lft > 0", :order => "lft ASC" end Where all subsuquent find operations have those options applied. In this case: Function.find(:all) Would actually be equivalent

Sorry to ask a windows question her but I didn't know if a windows group would know about the sticky bit. I have a windows server that is our primary file server in our samba domain. I am hoping that windows as something like the sticky bit that can be set on a folder where in only the creator of the file can modify the file. Any easy way to do this using ntfs acls ? -- David Bear mobile:

Hi We are building a Linux app under Centos 5.3, using gnu make 3.81 and gcc 4.12. The working directory is on a remote machine and is either a Samba share or a Windows 7 share. We find that in the case of a Windows 7 share the resulting executable has the sticky bit set in group: On Windows 7 share: -rwxrwSrwx 1 <snip> myapp On Samba share: -rwxrwx--x+ 1 <snip> myapp The

Hi, I have made a patch which improves scp utility. It adds two new features: rate limit and resume support. With rate limit it's possible to limit transfer speed. Resume allows to continue file transfer where it was last interrupted. Also the progress meter was improved. Here is my patch, please send comments about it and what I can do better if there is something to fix. ---

Hi, I used to have a couple of applications running on a single server. Now they have been migrated in two server, load balanced using sticky sessions. They told me that files in the first server will be replicated during the night to the secondary. I still have my old Capistrano recipe to be updated. I thought I can create two different environments, one for the first server, one for the second

Hi there, I have a xapian index whose results are being sorted by a value, with (PHP bindings): $enquire->set_sort_by_value($sort_data_value); This is because I want the results returned in chronological order of publication date. However, I now have a need to have certain results be 'sticky' at the top of the resultset, regardless of their publication date. Obviously there are