similar to: [Bug 1369] New: gss-cleanup.sh sometimes fails on fast machines

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1358 Summary: closefromtest fails, differently, sometimes Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1347 Summary: LLONG_MAX v LONGLONG_MAX Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.6p1 Platform: PPC OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: David.Leonard at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688 David Leonard <David.Leonard at quest.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |David.Leonard at quest.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

I would like to request additional consideration for inclusion of the gss-keyex patch (https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1242) into mainline OpenSSH. I know this comes up every few months, and I know that the current answer is "no" (as stated in November 2007), so I'll get straight to the new information and possibly-new arguments. 1. I conducted a careful, line-by-line

It took me a while to track this down. I am using MIT Kerberos 1.4.3 and libgssapi-0.7. With some patches that came with Suse 10, but that doesn't appear to be relevant. I have been using openssh-4.2p1 (with Simon's patches) and openssh-4p3p2 out of the box. I see the same problem no matter which version of openssh I am using. I am using two Suse Linux x86 boxes as a test

Hi, We were unable to use nsupdate-gss to a Windows 2003 Active Directory. I modified the nsupdate-gss script to use the local Domain Controller to do the DNS update and then it works (albeit giving a TKEY integrity error). The patch attached adds a 5th argument to the command line to specify the local Domain Controller to send the DNS update to. Usage: nsupdate-gss.pl HOST DOMAIN IP TTL

On 04/16/2015 06:33 AM, Mike wrote: > Hi Johnny, > > Thank you for your response. I thought to choose the sernet package > because of the following stated in Samba Readme: > > Samba packages shipped in some distributions like e. g. Fedora, RHEL may > not be able to be used as Samba AD DC, because the distribution relies on > MIT Kerberos which isn't supported by

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:03 PM, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > This was required for kerberos secured updates prior to el7.1 and el6.6 ... > > The problem in the underlying kerberos libraries was resolved so that > kerberos based updates worked with gss again and spnego doesn't need to be > compiled in. >

Hai, ? Im know this might not be the place to ask, but im doing it anyway..? ;-) ? Im testing an debian Jessie server with squid3 ( 3.4.8 ) Its running Debian Samba 4.1.13 with winbind. ? Im having troubles, to get the squid auth working. So my question is is someone here using kerberos authentication on squid. ( 3.4.x ) Or someone who is using the gss-spnego helper protocol. ? Im using this

Dear all, I am trying to use ssanova of the gss package but met some error that I cannot figure out the answer for. Here is the code I am using to explain the problem. library(gss) set.seed(5732) x=(1:100)/100 y=1+3*sin(2*pi*x)+2*(x>0.7)+rnorm(x) x1=rnorm(100) x2=rnorm(100) part.fit=ssanova(y~x, partial=~cbind(x1,x2)) summary(part.fit) part.fit=ssanova(y~x, partial=~cbind(as.numeric(x1),x2))

On 16 Apr 2015 14:29, "Johnny Hughes" <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > > On 04/16/2015 06:33 AM, Mike wrote: > > Hi Johnny, > > > > Thank you for your response. I thought to choose the sernet package > > because of the following stated in Samba Readme: > > > > Samba packages shipped in some distributions like e. g. Fedora, RHEL may >

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1339 Summary: pam_dhkeys doesn't work (PAM_REINITIALIZE_CRED without PAM_ESTABLISH_CRED) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.6p1 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: PAM support

Hi I'm using gss and when I use predict it gives me an error that I don't understand. This is the message: Error in env$fun(x, env$env) : gss error in phi: inputs are out of range Can someone tell me what it means ? Thanks EJ -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send

Hi, I have seen this link in the samba website: http://de.samba.org/samba/ftp/tsig-gss/nsupdate-gss about a tool for updating DNS Windows Servers from linux clients. I would like to know: - whether this works with Windows 2003 DNS Servers. - Any tutorial, documentation or similar. I have googled a bit for some references but I couldn't find anything. Thanks, Miguel

Dear SAMBA experts, I'm looking to emulate the behavior of some older Windows servers, mainly old Win2k/XP machines. On newer clients (possibly XP-SP2 and above), the SMB server will send a GSS-API message at the end of the Negotiate Protocol Response packet detailing the supported Security Service Providers by OIDs in a negTokenInit structure. However, older servers did not send this message

I'm using R 2.8.1 on Ubuntu 8.10. I'm writing partly to ask what's wrong, partly to tell other users who search that there is a work around. The General Social Survey is a long standing series of surveys provided by NORC (National Opinion Research Center). I have downloaded some years of the survey data in SPSS format (here's the site:

On 04/16/2015 12:53 AM, Mike wrote: > CentOS 7.1503 installed. > Installed Samba 4 from sernet: Version 4.1.17-SerNet-RedHat-11.el7 (to be > configured). > > The samba wiki Readme First page states, "Some distributions like . . . Red > Hat Enterprise Linux (and clones), ship BIND9 packages with disabled > GSS-SPNEGO option, which is required for signed DNS updates when

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3642 Bug ID: 3642 Summary: GSS treats hostnames case sensitive -> suggestion for docs of GSSAPIStrictAcceptorCheck setting Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.5p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

On 17 Apr 2015 00:42, "Mike" <1100100 at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:03 PM, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > This was required for kerberos secured updates prior to el7.1 and el6.6 ... > > > > The problem in the underlying kerberos libraries was resolved so that > > kerberos based updates worked

Hello all, I'm gearing up for an RPM deployment of 4.2p1 on SuSE (SLES 9). However, the files under contrib/suse in the OpenSSH distribution appear to be out-of-date. In particular, SuSE seems to handle init scripts quite differently now. So, is anyone building local RPMs for SuSE? If so, could you post the .spec file you are using? Is there any interest in updating the contrib/suse