similar to: [Bug 1369] New: gss-cleanup.sh sometimes fails on fast machines

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1358 Summary: closefromtest fails, differently, sometimes Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1347 Summary: LLONG_MAX v LONGLONG_MAX Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.6p1 Platform: PPC OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: David.Leonard at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688 David Leonard <David.Leonard at quest.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |David.Leonard at quest.com -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

I would like to request additional consideration for inclusion of the gss-keyex patch (https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1242) into mainline OpenSSH. I know this comes up every few months, and I know that the current answer is "no" (as stated in November 2007), so I'll get straight to the new information and possibly-new arguments. 1. I conducted a careful, line-by-line

It took me a while to track this down. I am using MIT Kerberos 1.4.3 and libgssapi-0.7. With some patches that came with Suse 10, but that doesn't appear to be relevant. I have been using openssh-4.2p1 (with Simon's patches) and openssh-4p3p2 out of the box. I see the same problem no matter which version of openssh I am using. I am using two Suse Linux x86 boxes as a test

Hi, We were unable to use nsupdate-gss to a Windows 2003 Active Directory. I modified the nsupdate-gss script to use the local Domain Controller to do the DNS update and then it works (albeit giving a TKEY integrity error). The patch attached adds a 5th argument to the command line to specify the local Domain Controller to send the DNS update to. Usage: nsupdate-gss.pl HOST DOMAIN IP TTL

On 04/16/2015 06:33 AM, Mike wrote: > Hi Johnny, > > Thank you for your response. I thought to choose the sernet package > because of the following stated in Samba Readme: > > Samba packages shipped in some distributions like e. g. Fedora, RHEL may > not be able to be used as Samba AD DC, because the distribution relies on > MIT Kerberos which isn't supported by

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:03 PM, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > This was required for kerberos secured updates prior to el7.1 and el6.6 ... > > The problem in the underlying kerberos libraries was resolved so that > kerberos based updates worked with gss again and spnego doesn't need to be > compiled in. >

Hai, ? Im know this might not be the place to ask, but im doing it anyway..? ;-) ? Im testing an debian Jessie server with squid3 ( 3.4.8 ) Its running Debian Samba 4.1.13 with winbind. ? Im having troubles, to get the squid auth working. So my question is is someone here using kerberos authentication on squid. ( 3.4.x ) Or someone who is using the gss-spnego helper protocol. ? Im using this

Dear all, I am trying to use ssanova of the gss package but met some error that I cannot figure out the answer for. Here is the code I am using to explain the problem. library(gss) set.seed(5732) x=(1:100)/100 y=1+3*sin(2*pi*x)+2*(x>0.7)+rnorm(x) x1=rnorm(100) x2=rnorm(100) part.fit=ssanova(y~x, partial=~cbind(x1,x2)) summary(part.fit) part.fit=ssanova(y~x, partial=~cbind(as.numeric(x1),x2))

On 16 Apr 2015 14:29, "Johnny Hughes" <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > > On 04/16/2015 06:33 AM, Mike wrote: > > Hi Johnny, > > > > Thank you for your response. I thought to choose the sernet package > > because of the following stated in Samba Readme: > > > > Samba packages shipped in some distributions like e. g. Fedora, RHEL may >

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1339 Summary: pam_dhkeys doesn't work (PAM_REINITIALIZE_CRED without PAM_ESTABLISH_CRED) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.6p1 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: PAM support

Hi I'm using gss and when I use predict it gives me an error that I don't understand. This is the message: Error in env$fun(x, env$env) : gss error in phi: inputs are out of range Can someone tell me what it means ? Thanks EJ -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send

Hi, I have seen this link in the samba website: http://de.samba.org/samba/ftp/tsig-gss/nsupdate-gss about a tool for updating DNS Windows Servers from linux clients. I would like to know: - whether this works with Windows 2003 DNS Servers. - Any tutorial, documentation or similar. I have googled a bit for some references but I couldn't find anything. Thanks, Miguel

Dear SAMBA experts, I'm looking to emulate the behavior of some older Windows servers, mainly old Win2k/XP machines. On newer clients (possibly XP-SP2 and above), the SMB server will send a GSS-API message at the end of the Negotiate Protocol Response packet detailing the supported Security Service Providers by OIDs in a negTokenInit structure. However, older servers did not send this message

On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 01:30:11AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > * for Debian trixie (current testing): > > * add dependency-only packages called something like > openssh-client-gsskex and openssh-server-gsskex, depending on their > non-gsskex alternatives > * add NEWS.Debian entry saying that people need to install these > packages if they want to retain

I'm using R 2.8.1 on Ubuntu 8.10. I'm writing partly to ask what's wrong, partly to tell other users who search that there is a work around. The General Social Survey is a long standing series of surveys provided by NORC (National Opinion Research Center). I have downloaded some years of the survey data in SPSS format (here's the site:

On 04/16/2015 12:53 AM, Mike wrote: > CentOS 7.1503 installed. > Installed Samba 4 from sernet: Version 4.1.17-SerNet-RedHat-11.el7 (to be > configured). > > The samba wiki Readme First page states, "Some distributions like . . . Red > Hat Enterprise Linux (and clones), ship BIND9 packages with disabled > GSS-SPNEGO option, which is required for signed DNS updates when

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3642 Bug ID: 3642 Summary: GSS treats hostnames case sensitive -> suggestion for docs of GSSAPIStrictAcceptorCheck setting Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.5p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

On 17 Apr 2015 00:42, "Mike" <1100100 at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:03 PM, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > This was required for kerberos secured updates prior to el7.1 and el6.6 ... > > > > The problem in the underlying kerberos libraries was resolved so that > > kerberos based updates worked