similar to: [Bug 511] PublickKeyAuthentication failures when account password expires

The format you're describing here actually has *more* overhead than Ogg, not less. It's also unseakable, not robust errors, and without support for metadata. I'm not sure why you would want that. It's not like you're forced to include much data in the Ogg metadata (which seems to be the source of all the overhead you're seeing). Jean-Marc On 05/12/2016 11:51 AM, Amit

Hello Jean-Marc, Assuming that a 48KHz, 20ms 8-bit linear PCM data which is 960 bytes is compressed to 64 bytes (for assumption). The with the Oggs header (4 byte) + 1 segment entry (which is the size of the segment itself) + 64 bytes will amount to (4+1)/(4+1+64) = ~7.2%. This when compared with the original Oggs container itself for the same data payload size (26+1)/(26+1+64) = ~29.6%. Even if

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=511 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Comment #9 from djm at mindrot.org 2005-10-23 22:22 -------

Hello Jean-Marc, I suspected the answer to be No. For HMI panels, except for the capture pattern and a single page segment entry, other fields are not important, and which results in almost 7% overhead for a 20ms raw frame encoded with Opus. At the same time the file processing complexity is way too less considering that CRC's do not not need to be considered (programmer pods ensure that)

On 05/12/2016 10:35 AM, Amit Ashara wrote: > For HMI panels, except for the capture pattern and a single page segment > entry, other fields are not important, and which results in almost 7% > overhead for a 20ms raw frame encoded with Opus. I'm not sure how you get a 7% overhead. In most uses I've seen, the overhead is more around 1%. > At the same time the > file

Hello Jean-Marc, As an example, I am using the output of opus encoder to store the file as the following format and read back the same during decode process, without having much overhead. (Thought it would be useful to put a picture rather than running text) [image: Inline image 2] Regards Amit On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Amit Ashara <ashara.amit at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=511 Summary: PublickKeyAuthentication failures when account password expires Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.4p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo:

>>> Ralph Giles <giles at thaumas.net> schrieb am 21.12.2015 um 19:51 in Nachricht <CAEW_RkshUM55uwdvU6DsE17pLZki651Xvvu7d2Y6jObePXZwCQ at mail.gmail.com>: > On 21 December 2015 at 04:31, Ulrich Windl > <Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: > >> opusenc does not display the file name it processes. In Lunux when you use > some batch processing,

The overhead of Ogg (in file size) is pretty small and it's efficient enough for most applications (and uses far less CPU than the codec anyway). If anything, you might want to look at optimizing the existing Ogg implementation (e.g. like Tremor did in the context of Vorbis). Of course, you're always free to design a new container, but I doubt it's worth it and it's a lot of work

Hi Ulrich, As Jean-mark recommended, we created "--enable-check-asm" config option to active OPUS_CHECK_ASM macros in the optimization, where the C function is called inside and the results of C and optimization functions are compared when encoding/decoding the real audio files. Thanks, Linfeng On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Ulrich Windl < Ulrich.Windl at

Hello Ulrich, Putting some extra space is the not the reason for this request. It is the overhead of the frame v/s payload size. Basically larger the payload less % the overhead is (and that makes sense). However the complexity of implementing a read file structure where the file pointer has to go back-forth for reading the payload when multiple segments have to be read, CRC32 (something which

>>> Linfeng Zhang <linfengz at google.com> schrieb am 25.04.2017 um 01:52 in Nachricht <CAKoqLCDvAk7eeS-gpmqSHVxp4t-Lzzw7TLo5rRo=Ey_Q==cxGg at mail.gmail.com>: > Hi Ulrich, > > As Jean-mark recommended, we created "--enable-check-asm" config option to > active OPUS_CHECK_ASM macros in the optimization, where the C function is > called inside and the

Hello Ulrich 20ms is the size of each frame. The overall sound clips may be 0.25 - 0.75 secs each. Regards Amit On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Ulrich Windl < Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: > >>> Amit Ashara <ashara.amit at gmail.com> schrieb am 12.05.2016 um 17:47 in > Nachricht > <CAEyg9sgjbsxQY-=VnhQrKiGeTcFSRr1wxOPUhNyCQF8Piuahow at

"Unfortunately my search for a good free player for Android was not very successful" - I presume you are using an Android device. If that's the case, portable devices have really bad electronics from the point of view of HiFi - because of low voltage and output amplitude being close to power rails. My point is that you are not really comparing one lossy format to another, but rather

On 21 December 2015 at 04:31, Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: > opusenc does not display the file name it processes. In Lunux when you use some batch processing, it might be interesting! Example output for > "for f in *.wav;do opusenc --bitrate 160 $f ${f%.wav}.opus; done": In situations like this, i usually insert an 'echo $f;' before he

(Please wrap your lines.) On Oct 26 01:38:34, Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de wrote: > Playing with Opus 1.3 I converted a tone sweep with a sample rate of 96kHz (just for fun). Before I had converted that from WAV to FLAC, and to Vorbis without problems. Can you please post the original wav? I am not sure what Audacity means by a logarithmisch sweep. Is that a fixed number of Hertz per

>>> Jan Stary <hans at stare.cz> schrieb am 05.11.2018 um 11:05 in Nachricht <20181105100534.GB44329 at www.stare.cz>: > (Are we off‑list now by intention?) No, just fooled by the list defaults (some need just reply, others need reply to all) > >> Did you also try to listen at the beginning, shortly before the real tone > appears in the audible spectrum?

Hi Ulrich, thanks for the suggestion. My concern is that one of the valid inputs is "2.5", which would require conversion to an int, e.g. x10, but doing something like this would start to affect the code readability. On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:02 PM Ulrich Windl < Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: > Hi! > > A note on style: Looking at this chunk of the patch

Hi! Excuse the delay, but I had to deal with a corrupted NTFS file system that ate many important files on an USB stick... The FLAC version of the original is almost 6MB and it can be downloaded slowly from this time-limited link: https://sbr5vjid0jgmce4q.myfritz.net:40262/nas/filelink.lua?id=0ba5a10529a6fe7b On the meaning of a logarithmic sweep: If you use foobar2000 and the

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3558 Bug ID: 3558 Summary: Spelling "yes" as "Yes" in sshd_config has a fatal result Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.2p2 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: