similar to: [Bug 960] Support needed for NetBSD utmpx field ut_ss

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=960 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #746| |ok+ Flag| | ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2005-02-09 16:02 -------

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=960 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |3162 CC| |djm at mindrot.org Resolution|---

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=960 Darren Tucker <dtucker at dtucker.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #7 from Darren Tucker <dtucker at dtucker.net> --- Mass close of all bugs fixed in 8.4

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1732 Summary: Proper utmpx support for FreeBSD HEAD Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.4p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: ed

Hello OpenSSH hackers, The last couple of weeks I've been figuring out how hard it is to replace FreeBSD's <utmp.h> with <utmpx.h>. I don't think utmpx is perfect, but at least it's better than what we have now and at least it has gone through some form of standardisation. I noticed POSIX says the following [1]: | The <utmpx.h> header shall define the utmpx

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1448 Summary: core dump in send_file_name Product: rsync Version: 2.6.2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: NetBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: eravin@panix.com QAContact:

Unfortunately, the login.c changes after pre-19 have exposed some more NetBSD-centric problems concerning the lack of several fields in struct utmp. Here's another set of patches to fix NetBSD compiling (although they may also help some other UNIXes as well). Thanks, David --- configure.in.orig Mon Dec 27 09:09:05 1999 +++ configure.in Mon Dec 27 09:13:39 1999 @@ -264,6 +264,16 @@

here are patches to compile portable openssh 2.1.1p2 on netbsd, and some other platforms I suppose. itojun -------------- next part -------------- $NetBSD: patch-aa,v 1.8 2000/07/02 22:07:56 itojun Exp $ --- configure.in.orig Sat Jul 1 15:52:55 2000 +++ configure.in Mon Jul 3 06:49:00 2000 @@ -647,2 +647,6 @@ +OSSH_CHECK_HEADER_FOR_FIELD(ut_name, utmp.h, HAVE_NAME_IN_UTMP)

Hi, I'm using the system accounting functionallity of Samba 2.2.6. Everything is working fine and dandy except that there is a lag between when a user logs out of a Windos 2000 Domain member, the 'who' command still lists the user as logged on for the next 20 - 30 seconds. Does anyone know what causes this? Can I increase the frequency of utmpx updates? Can someone point me to an

Hello all, The next version of FreeBSD will use utmpx for its user accounting database, as opposed to utmp which is used right now. Unfortunately wtmpx and lastlog handling isn't standardized at all, which is why we took the liberty to integrate all these databases into a compact API, where setutxdb() can be used to switch to a different database and getutxuser() to search for a USER_PROCESS

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378 Summary: sshd does not update utmp/utmpx records correctly when "UseLogin" feature on Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: MIPS OS/Version: IRIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

Hi, I've installed openssh-2.1.0p2 on a Solaris 8 host (SPARC). The sshd corrupts utmpx/wtmpx when a client connects to this machine. Observable error: $ who who: Error --- entry has ut_type of 28265 when maximum is 9 It can be repeated and is attributable to the login done by sshd. Now, Solaris has only utmpx/wtmpx and not the old utmp/wtmp. It get's worse as more logins take place

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1413 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eravin@panix.com ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2004-06-09 13:54 ------- *** Bug 1448 has been marked as a duplicate

it seems that --enable-utmpx and friends have the effect of disabling the corresponding feature (i.e., #define-ing DISABLE_UTMPX etc.), which leads to the (perhaps not so) obvious breakage of UseLogin on Solaris etc. For the less anal (or reformed anal) configure-r who leaves these unspecified, everything is OK i'd suggest changes to configure.in, but i'm blissfully ignorant of autoconf.

We're trying to build OpenSSH 3.0.2p1 for Solaris 8 (among others) and are running into a problem with UseLogin and utmpx. If we set "UseLogin no" then we can login okay. finger or who won't find us, even with a TTY allocated altough "who /etc/wtmpx" will find us. But the real problem is if we set "UseLogin true" which we must do for BSM support on some

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 openssh-1.2.1pre20 has been released at: http://violet.ibs.com.au/openssh/files/ This release integrates more of Andre Lucas' portability patch, Ben Taylor's utmpx patch and some cleanups and bugfixes of my own. The auth-passwd failures should be fixed, as should lastlog support on NetBSD. Since Andre Lucas' patch included platform

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 openssh-1.2.1pre20 has been released at: http://violet.ibs.com.au/openssh/files/ This release integrates more of Andre Lucas' portability patch, Ben Taylor's utmpx patch and some cleanups and bugfixes of my own. The auth-passwd failures should be fixed, as should lastlog support on NetBSD. Since Andre Lucas' patch included platform

In case it is any help, here is the patch against openssh-3.0.1p1 that corrects the problem with last reporting on Solaris that I sent to the list a week or so ago against 3.0p1. There was no conversation about this aside from Rip Loomis' comment about including it to support BSM auditing - does this present a problem for other OSes to include the ut_name field in the utmpx entry? Should this

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378 drk at sgi.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary| sshd |sshd does not update |does not update utmp/utmpx |utmp/utmpx records correctly |records correctly when

Hi, Attached is a patch to 1.2.1pre18 that includes a number of portability changes, and more a more complete HPUX10.20 implementation. Thanks to Ben Taylor's utmpx patch, utmpx and wtmpx support are now in for HP, with a few caveats. It compiles cleanly on HPUX10.20 with gcc, cleanly on Linux, and with a few minor warnings on Solaris 2.6. Most compat changes are made via autoconf which