similar to: [Bug 938] "AllowGroups" option and secondary user's groups limit

Folks, I'm running into something which looks like a bug in linearscan allocator. Of course I can't be 100% sure it's not some unobvious mistake on my part, so I'd like to hear your opinion. First, I attach two files -- LLVM asm and the asm for my target. The problem with assembler is: on line 171 it uses register gr2, which is copied from gr6 above, on line 161. The only

On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > First, I attach two files -- LLVM asm and the asm for my target. The problem > with assembler is: on line 171 it uses register gr2, which is copied from gr6 > above, on line 161. The only predecessor of this basic block is jump on line > 90. The problem is that gr6 is not initialized in the interval from the > function entry till the

Hi everyone. I want to solve the following problem. I have a data.frame and I create a dotplot using lattice. Then I want to use the grid-package to create a combined graphic which contains the dotplot as well as a textplot() (using package gplots) of the data.frame next to the dotplot. Example code: library(lattice) library(grid) library(gplots) xx <- data.frame(f=factor(rep(1:5, each=5)),

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > First, I attach two files -- LLVM asm and the asm for my target. The > > problem with assembler is: on line 171 it uses register gr2, which is > > copied from gr6 above, on line 161. The only predecessor of this basic > > block is jump on line 90. The problem is that gr6 is not initialized in > >

Dear R-users, I would like to maximize the function g above which depends on 4 parameters (2 vectors, 1 real number, and 1 matrix) using optim() and BFGS method. Here is my code: # fonction to maximize g=function(x) { x1 = x[1:ncol(X)] x2 = x[(ncol(X)+1)] x3 = matrix(x[(ncol(X)+2):(ncol(X)+1+ncol(X)*ncol(Y))],nrow=ncol(X),ncol=ncol(Y)) x4 = x[(ncol(X)+1+ncol(X)*ncol(Y)+1):length(x)]

Hi, looking at the fresh CVS state I see: class Register<string n> : RegisterBase<n> { list<RegisterBase> Aliases = []; } while previously the Register class did not require any parameters. The change log is just: * Target.td: Revamp the Register class, and allow the use of the RegisterGroup class to specify aliases directly in register definitions. and I

On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > and I could not find any discussions in the archives. > > Why the change was necessary? Writing: > > def gr0 : Register<"gr0">; > def gr1 : Register<"gr1">; > def gr2 : Register<"gr2">; > def gr3 : Register<"gr3">; > def gr4 :

Dear all, I get an error message when I use polr() in MASS. These are my data: skugg grupp frekv 4 1 gr3 0 5 2 gr3 3 6 3 gr3 6 10 1 gr5 1 11 2 gr5 12 12 3 gr5 1 > > summary(polr(skugg ~ grupp, weights=frekv, data= skugg.cpy1.dat)) Error in optim(start, fmin, gmin, method = "BFGS", hessian = Hess, ...) :

The primary purpose of the attached patches is for portable OpenSSH to support changing expired passwords as specified in shadow password files. To support that, I did a couple enhancements to the base OpenBSD OpenSSH code. They are: 1. Consolidated the handling of "forced_command" into a do_exec() function in session.c. These were being handled inconsistently and allocated

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=938 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED ------- Comment #12 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-10-07 11:37 ------- Change all RESOLVED bug to CLOSED with the exception

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787 ------- Additional Comments From openssh_bugzilla at hockin.org 2004-02-20 13:01 ------- Created an attachment (id=548) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=548&action=view) NGROUPS patch ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Markus, ignore the other stuff I sent.. I need to go back to bed and stop trying to code.. <sigh> For everone else.. Will this make everyone happy? This does the follow. it will always honor AllowUsers. If there is no Allow/DenyGroups it stated they are not in allowUsers. IF there are AllowDenyGroups it tries them. And then stated they are not in either AllowUsers nor AllowGroups

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1315 Summary: Match Group does not support negation Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.6p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: wknox at

Hi, I ran across a case in which my server maintenance was simplified by using SSHD configuration options like this in sshd_config: AllowGroups admin at 192.168.0.* sshuser in much the same fashion as (Allow|Deny)Users. In this case, the goal is to provide access to administrators only from the local network, while allowing SSH users to login from anywhere. This (IMHO) simplifies access

Could everyone please test the latest snapshots as we will be making a new release soon. If you have any patches you would like us to consider, please resend them to the list ASAP. -d -- | Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> \ ``E-mail attachments are the poor man's | http://www.mindrot.org / distributed filesystem'' - Dan Geer

Hello Everyone, I am using an HP9000 with HPUX 9.04D with gcc 2.8.1. When running configure for samba 2.03 I receive the following error: checking statvfs function (SVR4)... no checking for 3-argument statfs function (DEC OSF/1)... no checking for two-argument statfs with statfs.bsize member (AIX, 4.3BSD)... yes checking if large file support can be enabled no checking configure summary

ÎÒ¹«Ë¾ÏµÍâóÆóÒµ£¬ÓÐÒâÀ©´ó¾­Óª¹æÄ££¬ÏëÔÚ¹óµØÑ°ÕÒºÏ×÷»ï°é£¬Ìؽ«´Ë¼ÛÄ¿±íÌṩ¸øÄú·½²Î¿¼£¬ÎÒ¹«Ë¾±£Ö¤²úƷΪȫÐÂÔ­×°Èý¸öÔ°ü»»Ò»Äê°üÐÞÈý°ü£¬±£Ö¤ÐÅÓþ£¬»õµ½¸¶¿î £¬²»ÏêÊÂÒËÄú¿ÉÀ´ÈËÀ´µç´¹Ñ¯£¡ÈçÓдòÈÅ£¬Çë¶à°üº­£¡£¡£¡ ÁªÏµÈË£º¹ù½õºê ÁªÏµµç»°£º(0)13859713911 ¹«Ë¾£ºÌ¨Íą̊±±ºè´óÆóÒµÉÌó¹«Ë¾ Ò»¡¢µçÄÔÅä¼þ (ÈËÃñ±Ò) 1.cpu InteI p4 2G/1.8G/1.7G(Socket478) £¤ 500/420/390Ôª InteI p4 1.6G/1.5G/1.4G(Socket478) £¤

Hi all, for the data below I would like to 1. generate a dummy variable for each group "gr" of the same composition by people, then save each portion in a separate file, 2. compute the frequency of "1"'s in "x" for each person by group "gr". So, "mike" will have freq=2/3, as he has two "1" and one "0" in 3 groups.

Hello! Is there an (semi)automatic way to save registers used by a function? For example, on my target I have to store ar0-ar4 and gr0-gr4, gr5, gr6. For now I just emit huge prologue code to push them all to stack -- even if they are not modified at all. Is there a way to tell LLVM which registers must be stored, and have it automatically issue pushes/pops? I can live with current design,

Hey everyone, After discussing the AllowGroups I think I've discovered a bug. The system is a solaris 8 system and the problem is that when I use AllowGroups with no AllowUsers args, the proper actions happen. Same with AllowUsers and no AllowGroups. When I try to combine the two, none of the Allow directives seem to take. Is it just me or maybe a bug? -James