similar to: K8MM motherboard with S3 unichrome on x86_64

I have and new motherboard and trying to get X going. it starts at 800x600 and vesa driver... I have tried via (I get not driver found) I have tried S3 I have tried savage None of these work. I tried them all as I was getting conflicting information on the net about which driver it is. below is lspci -v Any suggestions on what to try? THanks, jerry 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: VIA

Am Freitag, den 25.09.2015, 22:45 +0200 schrieb Marcus Schopen: > Hi Guus, > > Am Freitag, den 25.09.2015, 17:46 +0200 schrieb Marcus Schopen: > > Hmmm ... I've tried "LocalDiscovery = yes" > > in /etc/tinc/mytunnel/tinc.conf already, but that didn't help. Config on > > client A is: > > > > --------------- > > Name = clienta >

My OQO has a VIA chipset. From the hwconf: class: VIDEO bus: PCI detached: 0 desc: "VIA Technologies, Inc. CX700M2 UniChrome PRO II Graphics" vendorId: 1106 deviceId: 3157 subVendorId: 1106 subDeviceId: 3157 pciType: 1 pcidom: 0 pcibus: 1 pcidev: 0 pcifn: 0 When I install Centos, I default to the vesa driver, and it operates at the monitor's native 800x480. Of course I

is_local_lowmem() treats its physical address input as a machine address; this causes agpgart to fail while calling ioremap_nocache(). X still does not load on my Athlon 64 / Via S3 Unichrome, so perhaps best not to apply just yet. Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com> --- xen-ioremap-fix/linux-2.6-xen-sparse/arch/i386/mm/ioremap-xen.c~ioremap 2006-06-22 20:30:20.000000000 +0300

hello, at first my english is very bad so please no jokes :) i know there're many topics about flyff and wine but i dont find anything about my problem with flyff and wine... :( i already installed Directx redist , activex with mozilla and winetricks in the wine config i set the Flyff.exe and the neuz.exe under windows vista and deactivated the sound driver .... ok now when i started

Funny thing happening with an NT Client: it sees all the files in a public Samba share, but when I make any change (like renaming a file or dropping files into it) the change doesn't show up in the window until I press F5 (Refresh). Is it some config in Samba whichs defaults to "lazy" behavior which I'm failing to see? Thanx 4All, Juan --

I am using llvm-2.6 and the ConstProp.cpp file is http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/ConstantProp_8cpp_source.html and the exact error message is: llvm[0]: Compiling ConstantProp.cpp for Release build (PIC) /home/tarun/Desktop/compiler/LLVM/llvm-2.6/include/llvm/Analysis/ConstantFolding.h: In member function ‘virtual bool<unnamed>::ConstantPropagation::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)’:

The clone llvm:CloneBasicBlock copies the phi function in the replicated basic block from the original basic block. I don't want the copy of phi in relplicated block. For now I am creating .bc file with -O0 option so that it doesn't generate phi function in first place. Is this a good approach or there are some other function available for it. Tarun On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Eli

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 5:27 PM, tarun agrawal <tarun at cse.iitb.ac.in> wrote: > I am using llvm-2.6  and the ConstProp.cpp file is > http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/ConstantProp_8cpp_source.html > > and the exact error message is: > > llvm[0]: Compiling ConstantProp.cpp for Release build  (PIC) >

While compiling the ConstantProp.cpp I am getting the following error. error: too few arguments to function ‘llvm::Constant* llvm::ConstantFoldInstruction(llvm::Instruction*, llvm::LLVMContext&, const llvm::TargetData*) Regards Tarun -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I need to get all the basic blocks that are there, in the path from definition of an instruction to use of that instruction. Regards Tarun -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110503/4d3852b7/attachment.html>

On 5/3/11 4:08 PM, tarun agrawal wrote: > HI > > I know it is a very simple question not worth asking here but I am > really struggling pls help me out.. This is a question worth asking; it's just that not everyone can answer all the time. :) If all you want to do is to follow the SSA def-use chain within a single function, then this is very easy. All you have to do is use

Thanks John, I know how to iterate through def-use chains and I also have realized the need for an algorithm to do the work. But the algorithm I am able to figure out is not linear in time. It wold be a great help if someone suggest me a way to get all basic-block along all path between two instruction. On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:00 AM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote: >

Hi, I am using alias analysis to determine whether two values are alias or not. But I am not able to figure out the algorithm that is being used to determine May , Must and No Alias. Thanks and Regards Tarun Agrawal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120225/e06daae7/attachment.html>

Hi While compiling the ConstantProp.cpp I am getting the following error. error: too few arguments to function ‘llvm::Constant* llvm::ConstantFoldInstruction( llvm::Instruction*, llvm::LLVMContext&, const llvm::TargetData*) I am using llvm-2.6 and the ConstProp.cpp file is http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/ConstantProp_8cpp_source.html and the exact error message is: llvm[0]: Compiling

Hi, I am writing a pass for constant propagation using graph restructuring ( code duplication). I am facing following difficulties.. 1) I need to replicate the basic block but without phi function in the replicated block. How can I do this. 2) I need to insert that basic block after and before some particular basic block. Regards Tarun Agrawal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 5:07 PM, tarun agrawal <tarun at cse.iitb.ac.in> wrote: > While compiling the ConstantProp.cpp I am getting the following error. > > error: too few arguments to function ‘llvm::Constant* > llvm::ConstantFoldInstruction(llvm::Instruction*, llvm::LLVMContext&, const > llvm::TargetData*) If you're reporting a build error, please include the

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20031012/59c113df/attachment.htm -------------- next part -------------- Hello, We are planning to buy following Hardware for Asterisk TestBed. Please let me know if this seems fine to you. 1. IP Phones ( 5 in number) CISCO 7940/7960, SNOM 200, Pingtel xpressa 2. Wildcard T100P interface card,

Hi, I want to find the dynamic slice of a given code. Is this already implemented in LLVM?. If not which functions are there in the LLVM to do dynamic analysis.

HI I know it is a very simple question not worth asking here but I am really struggling pls help me out.. On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:10 PM, tarun agrawal <tarun at cse.iitb.ac.in> wrote: > Hi, > > I need to get all the basic blocks that are there, in the path from > definition of an instruction to use of that instruction. > > > Regards > Tarun > --------------