similar to: NO NAME (Because of --dry-run) output

I went ahead and moved to the trunk versions of RSpec and Spec:Rails because I wanted to try out the new Story Runner feature. However, when I tried to do "rake spec:doc", I got the following: AccountController - NO NAME (Because of --dry-run) AccountHelper - NO NAME (Because of --dry-run) User (in general) - NO NAME (Because of --dry-run) - NO NAME (Because of --dry-run) - NO NAME

Hey all, I see examples showing up that look like this: describe Thing do before(:each) do @thing = Thing.new end it do @thing.should be_something end end This will produce output like this: Thing - should be something But "it do" is driving me mad :( We need a better word. Of course, ''specify'' has not been completely removed, so you can still do

Rails 1.2.5 Ruby 1.8.6 Rake 0.7.3 RSpec 1.0.8 PostgreSQL 8.2.5 I am experiencing a problem with the "rake spec spec" task on an initial trial of rspec. After creating the rails app I installed rspec and rspec_on_rails in the vendor\plugins subdirectory from svn. I then used ruby script\generate rspec_model product. I next manually created the database instances depot_development and

I have the latest version of rspec and rails-rspec installed. I''m using the debian versions of ruby and rails. On a new project after a generate an "rspec_model" and then try to run "rake spec", I get the following error: dan at dan-server:~/projects/cw/registration$ rake spec (in /home/dan/projects/cw/registration)

Hi there, I''ve installed rspec, rails plugin & generators thusly: $ sudo gem install rspec $ sudo gem install rspec_generator $ sudo gem install zentest -v 3.4.1 $ ./script/plugin install svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/rspec/tags/REL_0_7_2/vendor/rspec_on_rails/vendor/plugins/rspec $ ./script/generate rspec $ ./script/generate rspec_model ModelName With Rails version: $ rails

I had posted this on the regular Rails list, but upon trying this in script/console, it seems like the behavior only exists when running rspec. I''m getting some weird behavior in one of my models. I have a model defined something like this class User < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessor :password validates_presence_of :password end If I validate the model without specifying a

rspec_resource_generator ======================== By Pat Maddox Use this generator to generate RESTful scaffolding with RSpec specifications. Syntax is exactly the same as the scaffold_resource generator: ./script/generate rspec_resource ModelName [field:type field:type] When you run this generator, it will create a migration, model, and model spec file. In addition, it gives you a RESTful

rake spec seems to work fine, but I keep getting a usage error at the end of the spec run: /usr/local/bin/ruby -I"/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-0.6.4/ lib" "/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-0.6.4/bin/spec" Usage: spec [options] (FILE|DIRECTORY|GLOB)+ --diff Show unified diff of Strings that are expected to be equal when

In rspec_on_rails, the spec:doc task uses --dry-run, which doesn''t jive well with rspec''s ability to write docs for you. For example, I use the rspec_expectation_matchers plugin from spicycode.com (scanned for a name, didn''t find one =), and end up writing specs like: it { @ticket.should validate_presence_of(:name) } Which results in specdocs such as: Ticket

Hi, This is weird All my current spec examples are passing (about 750 of ''em) except a set of 6 in a specific controller spec. I get the following failure on each 6 when I run it via $ rake spec for example: --- ActionController::UnknownAction in ''MembershipsController handling PUT /project/ID/membership/N/accept should flash message'' No action responded to

Hi Easy one - I just wondered why all spec files for rspec_on_rails end "_spec.rb" instead of just ".rb"? They are all inside the spec folder so surely the fact they are specs is implicit? Ashley

Hi! I was just wondering how you typically generate a spec HTML report in a Rails app. Currently I''m doing something like this: spec spec -f h:spec/spec_report.html But that seems sort of clumsy and I would have thought that there was a rake task for it. Have I overlooked something? Thanks! Peter ---------------------------- Peter Marklund Garvar Lundins Gr?nd 7 11220 Stockholm

how would you check for a range using rspec? person.password.range.should == Range.new(5..40) <- this doesn''t work -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20070527/4d8cb007/attachment-0001.html

Hi, Hi I am trying to use RSPEC on windows and i keep getting the following error "You must gem install win32console to use colour on Windows" I have installed this Gem but i am still getting the same error. The file that error is coming from is: C:\ruby\lib\ruby\gems\1.8\gems\rspec-0.8.2\lib\spec\runner\formatter\base_text_formatter.rb Do i need to put this line of code in? Where

Fyi, I made the following renames: * RailsExample -> RailsExampleGroup * FunctionalExample -> FunctionalExampleGroup * ControllerExample -> ControllerExampleGroup * ViewExample -> ViewExampleGroup * HelperExample -> HelperExampleGroup * ModelExample -> ModelExampleGroup This was done to keep the naming consistent with ExampleGroup.

Hey, May be it is just too deep night over here and I''m missing something though I got this failure on {{{response.should_not redirect_to}}}: ''QueuesController should allow authenticated user to access ''show'''' FAILED Matcher does not support should_not. See Spec::Matchers for more information about matchers. Also I''ve found this in

Hi all, I had some specs that were using fixture_file_upload that were passing just fine. Then I froze edge rails to get some 2.0 functionality, then a I upgraded to trunk rspec to deal with uninitialized constant ActionView::Helpers::JavaScriptMacrosHelper After a couple other of tribulations, I have now gotten down to just a couple of not passing specs, all using the fixture_file_upload.

Here is a very simple spec: -- require File.expand_path(File.dirname(__FILE__) + ''/../spec_helper'') describe Product, "The Product model" do describe "When a new blank product object gets created" do before(:each) do @product = Product.new end it "should not be valid" do @product.should_not be_valid

I happened to mix ryan bates'' authentication scaffold with rspec_scaffold on a demo project. and ran into the problem of mixing mock frameworks...ryan uses mocha. So, as a learning experience, I choose to redo ryan''s tests without mocha but ran into a strange problem with tests of the User model. With debugging you can see.... If you run just the user_spec.rb file, everything

I''m doing some housekeeping and just realised that the rdoc formatter produces gibberish: http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rdoc/files/EXAMPLES_rd.html Will anyone protest if I just go ahead and remove it? (I can''t imagine anyone using it, especially with the much better HTML formatter) Aslak