similar to: [Bug 792] mtu and NAT wrong solution

A colleague is working with a Samba installation where Windows clients are accessing the server over a VPN. They are seeing an issue where a share is visible, but if a directory contains more than 8 files, they get an error. The VPN is set to allow everything in both directions. Windows->Window sharing does work OK across the link, as do other large file transfers (NFS, FTP). The Samba

Hi all, I want to set the advertised value of MTU for virbr0 interface on a Fedora 21 host to 1454 to accommodate the installation of new VMs for testing purposes. The aforementioned host is an OpenStack VM actually, which explains the need for a lower than 1500 MTU. I noticed Pieter Hollants' patch to set dhcp-option=<number>,"<value>" for an interface, but

Hi. I'm getting new lines for using with Asterisk. In my Telco they said I could choose between Analogic lines and RDSI lines... I've already bought a TDM400P with FXO modules. Can you give some hints on the differences between RDSI and normal Analogic lines? Would I have problems for using a RDSI line with the TDM? Any other issue in general? Thanks in advance, RODOLFO --- avast!

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277 ------- Additional Comments From stevesk at pobox.com 2002-06-15 14:19 ------- i don't know what this is: debug1: Credentials Expired debug1: proxy expired: run grid-proxy-init or wgpi first File=/tmp/x509up_u500

The following series adds the ability for a hypervisor to set an MTU on the guest during feature negotiation phase. This is useful for VM orchestration when, for instance, tunneling is involved and the MTU of the various systems should be homogenous. The first patch adds the feature bit as described in the proposed VFIO spec addition found at

The following series adds the ability for a hypervisor to set an MTU on the guest during feature negotiation phase. This is useful for VM orchestration when, for instance, tunneling is involved and the MTU of the various systems should be homogenous. The first patch adds the feature bit as described in the proposed VFIO spec addition found at

Hey all! I had an experience trying to set up an E1 in Brazil which could help somebody. In Brazil is very common telcos to have just R2 digital as their primary signaling. As I were trying to set up an E100P, which does not support R2 yet, I had to test an other signaling which works perfectly with Asterisk. They call this signaling as RDSI, using ccs as framing and PA (primary access) as

Hello all, I`ve got an AVM c2 card instaled on my SuSE box. I?m having problems configuring its channels. I don?t know how to set up asterisk to use the CAPI channels. I don?t know how to call them. My capi.conf is as follow, [general] nationalprefix=0 internationalprefix=00 rxgain=0.8 txgain=0.8 [interfaces] ;#########config de la primera interface CAPI##########333

Greetings List Members, I''ll firstly apologise if this isn''t the place that I should be posting this message but here goes. What I want to do is have a VPN (PPTP/IPSEC/CIPE/etc) server, but it must support more than one simultaneous connection. I currently have a PPTP VPN server setup that has port 1723 and protocol 47 DNAT''d through to the internal IP

Hello guys, I have this problem when a call is received in my PBX: (Caller) --> (Redirecting Service) --> (E1 PRI) --> (Asterisk PBX) --> (Internal Phone) Reception works fine, but when conversation finishes and the agent at internal phone hangs up, the call at caller's side is still alive for many seconds until it hangs up. The problem is that Telephone Company is billing me

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 5:17 PM, Kip Warner <kip at thevertigo.com> wrote: > Hey list, > > I've read the man page for both the client and server daemon, so either > I missed something or this isn't an SSH issue but something going on > with perhaps routers or MTUs. > > I am having problems with already established connections to a remote > server timing out

Hello Samba experts, Please read all email because i'm desperate!!!!! I have problem on joining to LAN-s using Samba. Finally i got a solution to "see" booth workgroups on "Entire Network", but i'm having problem with stations located in LAN2. From any station located in LAN1, I can see LAN2 workgroup and the browse list with stations located in LAN2, but when

Hi all, With help from others, I''ve been able to get Olaf''s patch for enabling MTUs >1500 for vifX.y and tapZ devices working. I''ve been able to boot dom0, launch domU and live-migrate without having the bridge''s MTU degrade at any time. Would the Xen RPM maintainers (and others) mind taking a look at the following patches? Kernel part:

Hey, On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Linus van Geuns <linus@vangeuns.name> wrote: > Hey, > > I am currently considering a two machine Xen setup based on AMD Opterons, > more precisely Dell R515s or R415s with dual Opteron 4274HE. > Does anyone has some Xen setup(s) running on top of Opterons 4274HE, Opteron > 4200 or Dell R515 machines and is willing to share some

Hi all, this time with the complete configuration files... We need help with our SuSe9.2 asterisk box We have one QuadBRI and one TDM40B in an ASUS pundit R-2 barebone. We have downloaded the bristuff (0.2.0-RC7j) and installed it without problems. once we downloaded and compiled asterisk, zaptel and all other stuff, the module installation succed in this order: modprobe zaptel modprobe qozap

Hi all, We need help with our SuSe9.2 asterisk box We have one QuadBRI and one TDM40B in an ASUS pundit R-2 barebone. We have downloaded the bristuff (0.2.0-RC7j) and installed it without problems. once we downloaded and compiled asterisk, zaptel and all other stuff, the module installation succed in this order: modprobe zaptel modprobe qozap modprobe wcfsx then the ztcfg output this: Zaptel

I have a bridge that has gigabit interfaces. The machine in question has the fun job of being a Bridge, Firewall and SMB server. Both of the Gigabit interfaces are connected to workstations directly via Xover cable (well MDI-X to be exact). My question is, if I enable jumbo frames on the gigabit interfaces will that make any difference in overall transfer rate of the bridge? I was thinking it

After successfully getting higher MTU to work on my Realtek NICs, I started testing the impact of higher MTU on file transfers using NFS exported ramdisk to ramdisk. The results were unexpected. The higher the MTU on the sending NIC, the lower the file transfer speed. I tested by using time cp to copy a 1GB file (In case compression might affect the results, so I dd the test file from the CentOS

Hi - I''ve been looking around for simple answers to this for a while now, but haven''t been able to find any HOW-TO type documentation. I am administering a site with a remote location connected primarily via a cipe tunnel over a SHDSL connection. We also have a direct PSTN connection between the sites. Seeing as phone calls here are not timed I plan to keep the PSTN connection

[Disclaimer : I'm not a network engineer] Hi, In a setup where OpenVSwitch is used with GRE tunels on top of an interface provided by tinc, I'm experiencing MTU problems and I'm not sure how to fix them. The manifestation of the problem is, from the user point of view, communication hang. And using "tcpdump -i there" displays lines such as : 18:54:00.345666 IP