similar to: hepta valen t snugg ling initi ators optio naliz e

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches similar to: "hepta valen t snugg ling initi ators optio naliz e"

2000 Apr 09
0
Non-member submission from [Chris Barker <barker@ling.ucsd.edu>] (fwd)
From: Chris Barker <barker at ling.ucsd.edu> To: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org Subject: X forwarding (still) broken on Linux This may be a lack-of-adequate-documentation problem rather than a bug, but I can't get X forwarding to work: localhost$ set | grep DIS DISPLAY=localhost.localdomain:11.0 localhost$ set | grep XA XAUTHORITY=/tmp/ssh-gzg13204/cookies localhost$ ssh -v
2009 May 19
1
Re: Why Firefox (under wine) print dialog doesn't have any optio
Yuri wrote: > I understand that this is probably not supported in Windows. > But I believe this is a good thing to have. > > Any thoughts? > > Yes! Your title has been truncated so nobody knows what option is missing. Please repost. What system are you using that requires you to run Firefox under wine instead of a native version of Firefox?
2002 Jul 11
1
(no subject)
Which version should I use out of the list? Or do I install all of them, one after the other? ext3-2.4-0.9.9-2410p4.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.10-pre4) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.9-249ac9.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.9-ac9) ext3-2.4-0.9.10-2410.gz 23Sep01 (Against 2.4.10) (Changelog) patch-rml-2.4.10-ac3-ext3-0.9.9-with-dir-speedup-1.gz 01Oct01 (From Robert Love. Unofficial :-))
2002 Jul 08
0
(no subject)
Which version should I use out of the list? Or do I install all of them, one after the other? ext3-2.4-0.9.9-2410p4.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.10-pre4) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.9-249ac9.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.9-ac9) ext3-2.4-0.9.10-2410.gz 23Sep01 (Against 2.4.10) (Changelog) patch-rml-2.4.10-ac3-ext3-0.9.9-with-dir-speedup-1.gz 01Oct01 (From Robert Love. Unofficial :-))
2004 Aug 31
1
Can't print properly through server, only direct client->printer
At 2:57 am +1000 6/7/04, Alex Satrapa wrote: >What happens if you change the line to: > > print command = grep -v '^[0-9][0-9]* *VM\?$' ... Then I replied : >It would have to be '^[0-9][0-9]* *VM\?^M$', but it didn't seem to >match that. I think the chances of having a line that starts with >that pattern is pretty remote, especially when you consider