similar to: can't mount any secondary drive partitions

I burned a DVD for CentOS 4.1. I booted from it and everything went fine for the graphical screen installation. I choose separate partitions for my /boot (hde6), / (hde9), and swap (hde12) areas. My /boot partition was ext2 and my / partition was ext3. I installed grub in my /boot partition successfully. I have a Boot Loader, System Commander 8.13 which controls the MBR. The installation then

Hi, Theodore, Thanks for your tests. But I got the problem and got it FIXED by flushing out the contents of /etc/blkid.tab before cloned clients reboot. I'm using the e2fsprogs-1.34-1 comes with Fedora Core 1. hello06.alexa.com root 135% rpm -qf /sbin/fsck e2fsprogs-1.34-1 hello06.alexa.com root 136% and the original contents in /etc/blkid.tab are attaching below, while my

Hi, I''am trying to use DRBD with XEN 3.0, the xen kernel is an 2.6.12.6 and i am using DRBD 0.7.14. The primary node is an opensuse 10 linux (not virtualized). The 2 volumes are LVM logical volumes with internal metadatas, there size is 54G. The secondary node is an opensuse 10 also but running over xen domain-0. When i setup drbd, synchronisation starts, but the whole system just

Hello, sorry for the long email, it's a little hard to explain this issue. The gist of it is that the Ubuntu version of parted allowed me to do something which perhaps should not be allowed i.e. creating partitions on a 2.7TB drive when the partition table is not *gpt* but *msdos*. I am trying to configure 2 identical servers, both are Dell Poweredge 2970 machines with 6 disks in them

I was trying to do a new install on RAID1 and my first drive happened to be partitioned correctly from previous use so I tried the 'clone partions' option in disk druid to create matching ones on the second drive and got this error message: "The source drive has partitions which are not constrained to the drive /dev/sda". What does that mean? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell

On 02/01/2017 10:58 AM, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > The major issue at this point relates to the schema. Your domain > functional level is a different thing to your server functional level, > so you can keep the domain functional level at 2008R2, which is what > Samba has reasonable support for. As this week I also looked into the functional levels that samba supports, I must

Hi, Apologies, this is going to be quite long - I'm going to provide as much info as possible. I'm running a system with ext3 fs on software RAID. The RAID set-up is as shown below: jlm@nijinsky:~$ cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid5] read_ahead 1024 sectors md0 : active raid1 hdc1[1] hda1[0] 96256 blocks [2/2] [UU] md5 : active raid1 hdk1[1] hde1[0]

Hello, I tried to ignore all mountpoints in Dovecot. I have two dovecot instances running: root at fileserver# doveadm instance list path name last used running /usr/local/var/run/dovecot dovecot 2013-12-21 08:09:34 yes /var/run/dovecot.smtp smtp-auth 2013-12-21 08:09:34 yes I give commands: root at fileserver# doveadm mount add '/*' ignore root at fileserver# doveadm

I just recently installed a second hard drive in my Samba server with the hopes of sharing it with the rest of my home network. It seems like Samba can not get the correct permissions to the drive, however. I have the drive mounted under /media/public, and when I try to map a share directly to it and open the share with a client, I get an NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME error. When I map the

I''ve installed a FC5 domU under RHEL5-beta2 dom0 with virt-manager. As the disk for domU I used: phy:/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol02,xvda,w In the domU I have partitions: /dev/xvda1 on / type ext3 (rw) /dev/xvda2 on /var type ext3 (rw) How do I access these partitions from dom0? For example if I take an LVM snapshot of LogVol02, how do I mount the / partition of the domU installed on

Today our server had seriuos problems, we had to reinitiate it and run fsck manually. Dou you think it's an ext3, kernel (vanilla 2.4.19) or hardware bug? The errors were (from syslog): -------------------------------- Oct 6 16:10:25 nou kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device Oct 6 16:10:25 nou kernel: 72:02: rw=0, want=230266240, limit=4882432 Oct 6 16:10:25 nou kernel: attempt

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:44:13AM +0200, Mykola Ivanets wrote: > Filter partitioned md devices out the same way as partitioned physical devices are filtered out > --- > daemon/listfs.ml | 22 +++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/daemon/listfs.ml b/daemon/listfs.ml > index 370ffb4..dc424f5 100644 > ---

Hello, I have configured advanced routing with success using three (03) network adapters ( ETH0, ETH1 and ETH2). Now I have to configure an addittion range in the same Interface ETH0 ( another internet ip range address ), so I would like to have TWO different ranges at the same ETHERNET CARD ( in this case ETH0 ) AND having advanced routing running it. I Did the same

I have one of those USB hard drive cases, and I have my old hard drive in it. Eventhough I have made the changes to mount multiple USB drives in one USB device (works fine for my media play with internal and SD drive), I am only getting the first partition (/Boot (2)) automounted. df does not show anything more about the drive, but the gnome hardware browser shows all three partitions on the

On Sun, 2017-01-29 at 20:47 +0000, Prof. Dr. Michael Schefczyk via samba wrote: > Dear All, > > I am running a two location SOHO network with a Microsoft AD on a > Windows 2008 R2 server. The only secondary DC is a Microsoft HyperV > VM running on the same Windows machine. My aim is to become more > independent from Microsoft products. Nevertheless, I need to upgrade > my

Dear All, I am running a two location SOHO network with a Microsoft AD on a Windows 2008 R2 server. The only secondary DC is a Microsoft HyperV VM running on the same Windows machine. My aim is to become more independent from Microsoft products. Nevertheless, I need to upgrade my server to Windows 2016 sometime soon - which does not mean that the DC level needs to be upgraded to Server 2016

Hello I have a samba PDC in an office with folder redirection. The people wants to access their files remotely, so i have set up a simple hamachi VPN. The clients can connect and sinchronize their files, but its extremely slow. Is it posible to make a second samba server in a high speed datacenter sinchronized with the office one? Can anyone give me some info about how to do that? Thank you

I thought I'd test replacing a failed drive in a 4 drive raid 10 array on a CentOS 5.2 box before it goes online and before a drive really fails. I 'mdadm failed, removed', powered off, replaced drive, partitioned with sfdisk -d /dev/sda | sfdisk /dev/sdb, and finally 'mdadm add'ed'. Everything seems fine until I try to create a snapshot lv. (Creating a snapshot lv

I effectively have 1 drive /dev/sda (it's actually a hardware raid 10 array) I have lots of free sapce. I want to resize my partitions (boot, home, /) bigger. Going to use Clonezilla to make an image of each partition and save it on another box. Then re-partition and format new bigger partitions. Then restore images with Clonezilla. But I know UUID's will be wrong and I don't feel

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <small>Hi <br> After the installation of </small><small>Windows and L</small><small>inux on my desktop.I partitioned the disk space under Windows and kept the partitions as