similar to: CentOS 4.2 - x86_64 - Crash

Hi Anyone know of there is an rpm available for this? Trying to build a loadbalancer from the LVS project for a webserver farm and struggling with ipvsadm <http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/software/kernel-2.6/ipvsadm-1.24-6.src.rpm> on 4.2 thanks

Hi All, Using CentOS 4.4 with ipvsadm-1.24-6. I am using LVS/ipvsadm to load balance webservers, with about 20 VIP's in use. My problem is that when I start the pulse service, all of the interfaces seem to appear correctly in the output of ipvsadm -ln , but it is not possible to connect to them. I discovered that the ones I _CAN_ connect to appear in the full ifconfig listing, while

Hi guys, I''m not sure where to post for help on this one, shorewall or lvs, I''ll start with shorewall (only cause Tom is a gun at this stuff, and is polite enough to tell me to bugger off to the LVS list if I''m posting in the wrong one ;) I have a single box that is my router/firewall/LVS. Internet -- eth0 - router/firewall - eth1 --- internal lan | eth2

Hi there, I got the solution for my problem, and thought may at someday somebody could use it. Julian Anastasov and some people from the LVS mailing list helped me with it. --- Subject: Re: LVS and CBQ Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:53:01 +0000 (GMT) From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> To: joern maier <joern.maier@informatik.uni-ulm.de> CC:

Hi I have a box that is a Linux LVS project based load balancer running on an 1850 and x86_64 bit version of CentOS. In the past i have never had issues with LVS but then again i have never tried it with x86_64 linux. This box will after a variable about of time, 1 day upto a week or so, stop accepting ssh connections, although http connections will be fine, and then after another period of

I've managed to configure a LVS Cluster to act as a transparent proxy squid farm, with a virtual server as load balancer, and three real servers. Because redirecting packets going to port 80 to port 3128 of squid in the load balancer doesn't works, the solution has a mix of ip route and iptables. Here is the script I wrote to configure transparent proxy. #!/bin/bash #Transparent proxy

Marta, As Alan pointed out the loc->net policy is Continue, it should probably be loc->net ACCEPT. This is from Tom''s Shorewall Documentation... http://www.shorewall.net/Documentation.htm#Policy CONTINUE - The connection is neither ACCEPTed, DROPped nor REJECTed. CONTINUE may be used when one or both of the zones named in the entry are sub-zones of or intersect with another zone.

Hi Andreas! I mainly understand what you mean, I tried to fix something on the script, I don''t know if I did it well. Can you take another look on it please and if is wrong to make the corrections directly on it so that I see where the mistake is... With this script I want to make limits for IP class 85.120.48.0/25 for international traffic in 256 KBps classes and for metropolitan

I'm now running CentOS 5 with about 10 domU's. RH/CentOS did a great job providing a polished and stable distribution for Xen. Excellent work! I would like to now play with using iptables and ipvadm (LVS) in the domUs. So essentially, what I want to do is to utilize a domU to run as a NAT/Firewall which directs traffic to another domU running ipvsadm (LVS). The LVS would then

I''m havign a HUGE amount of difficulty getting shoreline to work with LVS. We use it here constantly so we know it works. The problem is packets come in, get directed to a webserver, webserver returns the packet to firewall, and then it goes into a black hole. rp_filter is off globally on all interfaces. LVS seems to be working right.... I use shorewall tcrules to mark packets on

Hi all - If this is in the wrong group kindly direct me where to post. I have an odd problem using rsync across an smbmount (via fstab) of a WinNT drive to Linux Redhat 7.1. I have samba 2.0.10-2 (though smbd is not running) and rsync 2.4.6-2. I use the Linux machine to rsync folders on the WinNT machine to folders on our production webservers. This allows clients to update

>Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 06:04:02 -0800 (PST) >From: Nash Nipples <trashy_bumper@yahoo.com> >To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: IPFW: Blocking me out. How to debug? > >Dear W.D. > >oh come on. i have the same problem. Which problem are we talking about? cut and paste problem. >cut and paste logic: > >#!/bin/sh >#1. count packets >#2.

Hi I have 2nic firewall . I had to open some ranges of udp and tcp ports . I faced a problem that although all the ports are open Some functionality was not working . Any body used shorewall with H323 Voip traffic DNATed . Any help is appretiated . Thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: <shorewall-users-request@lists.shorewall.net> To: <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net> Sent:

Hello again, First, excuse me for my poor english. I''m trying now to make bandwith control in a firewall machine running Shorewall. This machine is also a bridge using bridge-utils bridge-utils-devel. It is a mandrake 10. The configuration is something like this: FTP/Webserver ------| eth0 eth1 Mailserver

Hello again, First, excuse me for my poor english. I''m trying now to make bandwith control in a firewall machine running Shorewall. This machine is also a bridge using bridge-utils bridge-utils-devel. It is a mandrake 10. The configuration is something like this: FTP/Webserver ------| eth0 eth1 Mailserver

Hi all, I have a Linux box with two connections to the internet over two routers and a private internal network. The linux box does masquerading. internet +----------+ 172.16.0.1 +-------------------+ <---- | Router 1 |-------------------| | +----------+ | 172.16.0.2 | | | eth1

Hallo Group, i want to implement a syn Flood Protection on our linux Router. on our Cisco we have this Access-list and rat-limit rate-limit input access-group 190 128000 128000 128000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop access-list 190 deny tcp any any established access-list 190 permit tcp any any access-list 190 deny ip any any now i was trying to wrote the same config with

Hi Guys, Here is the setup. LVS NAT cluster with director (dir), backup director (bdir), and two realservers (rs1 and rs2) running apache webserver. SSH DSA key-based authentication set up between rs1 and rs2 in order to facilitate automated (via cron) mirorring of htdocs directories. All works fine untill I decide to host DNS on the same cluster. As soon as I start BIND on rs1, ssh no longer

--- daemon/Makefile.am | 2 + daemon/lvm.c | 151 ---------------------------------------------- daemon/lvm.ml | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ daemon/lvm.mli | 19 ++++++ generator/actions_core.ml | 1 + 5 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 151 deletions(-) diff --git a/daemon/Makefile.am b/daemon/Makefile.am index 22a3036f8..e9c71ba3c 100644

i'm trying to setup LVS, and tried both the lvs-dr and the lvs-nat, but can't get any to work. I'm hoping people here can answer a few questions that might help and shed light onto the situation? #1 with regards to the Real Servers, is there anything that needs to be configured other that the http service? I ask this, because I suspect yes, and it has to do with what type of LVS you