similar to: PXE API for network interfaces.

On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Michael Brown via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Also, not a fork: http://git.ipxe.org/ipxe.git/commitdiff/8406115 A fork is a fork, regardless the reasons behind it (yes, I have some understanding in this case). iPXE is based off of forking further development as of a certain gPXE commit with some backporting of gPXE development to iPXE. --

Hello ! I am completely new to syslinux. I followed this instruction manually: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/pxe.html I am on debian and do not have syslinux installed, but using this debian box as a tftp server. I had to modify the instructions given by the installation above. I downloaded the 6.02 version and copied the files to the tftp root. I am using dnsmasq as a tftp

On Tue, 2018-12-18 at 14:10 -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 6:30 PM Joakim Tjernlund via Syslinux > <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-12-12 at 17:10 -0600, Carl Karsten wrote: > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is

IRC user ernini first noticed this. We both tried using gpxe/gpxelinux.0 from Syslinux-4.04-pre22. ernini used pxechain to a commercial NBP which RETs (the same as PXELINUX) and failed. Both of us had success with core/pxelinux.0 from Syslinux-4.04-pre22. For my test, I have a VM in VMware Server 2.0.2 (VMHW v7). I loaded gpxelinux.0 using the VM's built-in PXE ROM. Then I used

Hello all, I was reading http://www.etherboot.org/wiki/appnotes/autobootchainurl, and figured that as long as I was going to be modifying the code I might as well try a cleaner solution. ?Attached to this message is a patch that makes the following changes: 1) Allow the "dhcp" command to accept a list of interfaces and to try them in order until it succeeds, e.g.: ?gPXE> dhcp net0

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Wayne Workman <wayne.workman2012 at gmail.com> wrote: > I must say that I've learned an incredible amount and only hope to learn > more. Keep up the good work. Thanks. > I have been prowling your email correspondence for the FOG Project. You may > find them here: https://fogproject.org/ and their forums are located here: >

Hi, Anyone has tried to use pxechain with Etherboot? Here is my problem: The Etherboot client had no problem to get the list of install servers manual from the pxechain. But didn't matter which server was chosen, Etherboot client always tried to use the first server to do the installation. Etherboot 5.4 was used. What the problem may be? PXEchain or Etherboot? Thanks, Joyce --

On Jul 22, 2013 5:27 PM, "Gene Cumm" <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Matt Fleming <matt at console-pimps.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 20 Jul, at 09:48:38AM, Victor Sudakov wrote: > >> Negative. > >> > >> I have changed the stanza into > >> > >> label WDS > >> menu LABEL ^4.

Hello, I just grabbed http://bits.xensource.com/oss-xen/release/4.2.0-rc2/xen-4.2.0-rc2.tar.gz and tried to build it on Fedora 17 x86_64 host (gcc 4.7.0): make tools: .. make[5]: Entering directory `/root/xen/xen-4.2.0-rc2/tools/firmware'' make -C etherboot all make[6]: Entering directory `/root/xen/xen-4.2.0-rc2/tools/firmware/etherboot'' make -C ipxe/src bin/rtl8139.rom

> > Here is a bit of an odd request... II'm in a large company with lots of > politics getting in the way of things. We were able to convince the main IT > team to let us take over a subnet and run our own DHCP server. This lets us > create a really nice PXE environment where we can build servers and ship > them out. However, now we are in need to rebuild servers already

This patch set mainly allows the user to build a seabios or rombios only version of hvmloader. In addition, when building a seabios only hvmloader, Option ROMs like vgabios and etherboot are no longer required, and therefore can be disabled from the build. Dependency on the bcc compiler can also be avoided the same way. v2: Separate patches for separate issues Introduced config option to

Hi All, I have a situation where a remote network of computers that normally PXE boot Linux has been powered off so long, the BIOS boot order is forgotten, reverting to the HD only. With the machines PXE booted (manually) now thanks to a colleague, I have an opportunity to install Syslinux on the hard drive. I would like to install it on a small active partition, sda1, so that it then PXE

I installed CentOS6 with the xen4centos set of packages; then I tried to install KVM (for performance comparison), I got the following error in YUM: --> Processing Dependency: /usr/share/gpxe/e1000-0x100e.rom for package: 2:qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.4.x86_64 Package gpxe-roms-qemu is obsoleted by ipxe-roms-qemu, but obsoleting package does not provide for requirements I manually

The gPXE in the Syslinux tree is ridiculously old. We could either replace it with iPXE or just drop it, giving people a recipe for how to integrate with iPXE themselves. What do people think? -hpa

Microsoft has their "boot" version of their iSCSI software initiator. Apparently this still requires that the network card be iSCSI Boot "enabled." Intel seems to be the only obvious company out there supporting it on their Server adapters - I was wondering if there are any thoughts/plans on implementing iSCSI Boot functionality in the HVM Boot ROM? Or maybe there''s

Hi All, The ipxe git commit version changed, but its release version should still stay at v1.0.0 Signed-off-by: Yongjie Ren <yongjie.ren@intel.com<mailto:yongjie.ren@intel.com>> ------ diff -r 4086e4811547 tools/firmware/etherboot/Makefile --- a/tools/firmware/etherboot/Makefile Thu Jan 05 17:25:23 2012 +0000 +++ b/tools/firmware/etherboot/Makefile Fri Jan 06 14:30:54 2012 +0800 @@

Hallo, can I use pxelinux for booting a notebook via WLAN? Viele Gruesse! Helmut

Hi All, I've been trying to understand how to use pxechn.c32 to chain a local pxelinux menu item to a remote server which has it's own pxelinux hierarchy served via TFTP and HTTP. We have no control over DHCP next-server and filename fields so I wanted to exploit the "prefix" -p option that pxechn.c32 accepts. I spent a long time hitting my head against a brick wall until I

For me the motivation for gpxelinux.0 was the HTTP support. If this would work reliably in newer versions then I could happily live without a iPXE-based pxelinux. On 9 October 2013 13:36, Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> wrote: > "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor.com> writes: > > > The gPXE in the Syslinux tree is ridiculously old. We could either > >

Unable to boot using qemu-kvm and gPXE from virt-preview repository https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512358 Signed-off-by: Alan Pevec <apevec at redhat.com> --- common-blacklist.ks | 9 +++++++++ common-pkgs.ks | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/common-blacklist.ks b/common-blacklist.ks index 7c19aa4..2f8842f 100644 ---