similar to: [elflink] diskstart.inc:420: error: Sector 1 overflow by 5 bytes

Gene, thanks for doing "Reply-All". I only get digest, so this keeps me in the loop. Appreciated. > which appears to be included in diskstart.inc. I will have to dig in and > see > > how this all gets compiled (pointers always appreciated :-) ). > > Yes. > Is the build process documented? Or am I just going to have to plod through the makefiles? > As Ady said,

> > > Is the build process documented? Or am I just going to have to plod > through > > the makefiles? > > I don't think so. > Oh well... > > 1. Run installer > > 2. Installer loads ldlinux.sys onto the filesystem (and copies > ldlinux.c32, > > but irrelevant for now). > > 3. Installer calculates which blocks in the filesystem contain

On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Avi Deitcher <avi at deitcher.net> wrote: >> > Is the build process documented? Or am I just going to have to plod >> > through >> > the makefiles? >> >> I don't think so. > Oh well... >> > 1. Run installer >> > 2. Installer loads ldlinux.sys onto the filesystem (and copies >> >

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:38 AM, Avi Deitcher <avi at deitcher.net> wrote: > Gene, thanks for doing "Reply-All". I only get digest, so this keeps me in > the loop. Appreciated. > >> > which appears to be included in diskstart.inc. I will have to dig in and >> > see >> > how this all gets compiled (pointers always appreciated :-) ). >>

I'm working on a debugging/diagnostic image in order to debug/diagnose an issue with very recent machines using a UFD (USB Flash Drive) which really _should_ be partitioned but someone decides to be a little too quick and uses it raw. (FAT* file system on /dev/sdb rather than /dev/sdb1). Anyways, I've got a successful first iteration that'll say what the BIOS thinks about geometry and

git://git.zytor.com/users/genec/syslinux.git Branch core-diskstart-boot-for-hpa. I found that INT 13h AH 08h in BOCHS used ES, DI, at least when using a partitionless HDD, causing "Boot error" from the magic check as it was loaded to the wrong location. HPA suggested wrapping INT 13h with the push/pop for ES's safety. This then lead to checking over for all int 13h calls in

git://git.zytor.com/users/genec/syslinux.git Branch core-diskstart-chkerr-for-hpa verify_checksum is built to allow for segment wrap (ldlinux.sys larger than 33280 bytes if my math is right). If the wrap occurs, DS is no longer 0. If there's a checksum error after DS is no longer 0, it won't be able print checksumerr_msg properly. 2 commits: 1 to make the fix in verify_checksum; the

Hi Peter, The main part of this pull request includes commits that try to replace as many __intcall() invocations as possible. Some remain, but not many (and eventually they'll be gone too). There's also a patch to make better use of ld's --as-needed option and various other bug fixes/cleanups. The following changes since commit ff7334a2ce536b7f4b1f6d6f93ff4e285a3bd45a: Only

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:420 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-420.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: files: updates/ia64/RPMS/kernel-2.6.9-11.EL.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/kernel-devel-2.6.9-11.EL.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/kernel-doc-2.6.9-11.EL.noarch.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:420 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-420.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: kernel-2.6.9-11.EL.x86_64.rpm kernel-devel-2.6.9-11.EL.x86_64.rpm kernel-smp-2.6.9-11.EL.x86_64.rpm kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-11.EL.x86_64.rpm kernel-doc-2.6.9-11.EL.noarch.rpm:

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:420 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-420.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: kernel-2.6.9-11.EL.i586.rpm kernel-2.6.9-11.EL.i686.rpm kernel-devel-2.6.9-11.EL.i586.rpm kernel-devel-2.6.9-11.EL.i686.rpm kernel-doc-2.6.9-11.EL.noarch.rpm kernel-hugemem-2.6.9-11.EL.i686.rpm

hi all i have a following setup, Xlite --------> Asterisk --------------> Outbound provider (Dialout)------------> Client (mobile,landline phone) Xlite registered on kamailio, and Outbound call goes via outbound provider phone can ring properly but when i picked up phone then it suddently hangup call giving SIP response 420 "Bad Extension" back from ${provider IP address}

Hi Ben, Someone came in to the channel to report that the outputs on the second gpu of the NVS 420 were not being detected properly. Emil tracked it down to the pclass == PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA check in nouveau_display that you added in e412e95a in order to avoid modesetting on Tesla cards. This can be worked around by specifying nouveau.modeset=1. I think it's a little ridiculous to require

Hello: New to asterisk and hoping to use for http://summitcamp.org research station. While trying to use with Inphonex I find that incoming calls drop after about one minute-- -- Got SIP response 420 "Bad Extension" back from 208.239.76.169 == Spawn extension (incoming-inphonex, 210, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/inphonex-095bf208' Found that I can use `*CLI> sip

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2014-11-24 9:49 PM, mark4o wrote: > $ make check ... Original file size 441044 bytes. Compression > level 0, file size 421389 bytes. ./test_compression.sh: line 42: > let: last_size=: syntax error: operand expected (error token is > "=") I can reproduce on MacOS X 10.8.5. It doesn't seem to like the assignment

Full_Name: Albrecht Gebhardt Version: 0.99.0 OS: alpha, osf4.0 Submission from: (NULL) (143.205.180.40) Im not sure if this is really correct, but it has proven to work. 1. It is always a good idea to add -std1 to DEC cc's flags to force strict ANSI language mode. It was neccessary for 0.90.x to compile, so I used it for 0.99.0 too 2. I'm not sure if -fpe3 is neccessary for DEC f77,

Hi; I am running asterisk 1.6 from Fonality (Trixbox PRO). I am trying to initiate a call FROM a softphone client to asterisk (either an internal 4 digit extension call) or an outside line via a SIP trunk. In both cases, asterisk rejects the call with a 420. In this case, it?s a call from x3992 to x4415 Does this require a change on the softphone for x-call-detail? <--- SIP read

playing with hdt on a soekris 4801, Im getting HUGE delays in cpu_detect. I added some timing code, heres what Im seeing ACPI: Detecting 0 mS in detect_acpi MEMORY: Detecting 0 mS in detect_memory DMI: Detecting Table DMI: ERROR ! Table not found ! DMI: Many hardware components will not be detected ! 55 mS in detect_dmi CPU: Detecting 0 mS in get_cpu_vendor 0 mS in "intel cpu

playing with hdt on a soekris 4801, Im getting HUGE delays in cpu_detect. I added some timing code, heres what Im seeing ACPI: Detecting 0 mS in detect_acpi MEMORY: Detecting 0 mS in detect_memory DMI: Detecting Table DMI: ERROR ! Table not found ! DMI: Many hardware components will not be detected ! 55 mS in detect_dmi CPU: Detecting 0 mS in get_cpu_vendor 0 mS in "intel cpu

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27136 Summary: blank screen with G98 [Quadro NVS 420] (NV98) dual GPU, 4-head Product: xorg Version: 7.5 Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau