similar to: PXELINUX: DNS issue on unqualified names

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:32, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > Per doc/pxelinux.txt, the special PXELINUX filename specification of > "IP address::filename" allows "IP address" to be a DNS recognizable > name. ?If it contains no dots, the domain name (DHCP option 15) is > supposed to be appended to qualify the name. > > Testing PXELINUX 3.86,

I was able to solve the problem with the following configuration: label custom1 MENU custom1 kernel pxechain.com append ::custom1/pxelinux.0 label custom2 MENU custom2 kernel pxechain.com append ::custom2/pxelinux.0 configdir1/pxelinux.cfg/default configdir2/pxelinux.cfg/default Then I dropped the custom pxelinux.0 files in their respective directories, confgdir1 and configdir2. On Tue, Nov

Sorry Gene, I got the version of binutils is 2.17. I download the latest Binutils to make the *objdump* and *objcopy*. with both of these utilities to create new pxelinux.raw. then, the error message shows me that, objcopy -O binary pxelinux.elf pxelinux.raw ../lzo/prepcore pxelinux.raw pxelinux.bin ../lzo/prepcore: pxelinux.raw: output too big (30165, max 0) make[1]: *** [pxelinux.bin] Error 1

All, Thanks for all your help. Now, I can compile the latest source code base on RedHat 5.5 after update nasm(to 2.09) and binutil(2.17). And *make spotless* before *make* under core/ directory. But with the new pxelinux.0, the PXEClient can not bootup. The error info, No valid file system found! And stuck in there. I think maybe the gcc cause the problem. My gcc version is 4.1.2. Thanks aaron

Hardcoded options for PXELINUX (embedded in the pxelinux.0 binary by pxelinux-options) was introduced in 3.83. While working on documentation, I decided to try it on 5.10, verified that 209 (config-file) was set as an after option and saw no change in behavior. I then tested the same as a before with no change. I then tested 3.86, found it working and tested 4.06 and 4.00 and found them broken.

> * Gene Cumm, 2014-06-10 : > > > If 4.05 or 3.86 acted nicely, this would mean a bug. > > OK, so, with unpatched official binaries: > > 3.86 > ---- > > pxelinux.0 > Loads fine, assumes terminal width 15, displays menu, but then freezes > (I suspect it does not process any input from the serial port) > > gpxelinux.0 > Displays: >

* Gene Cumm, 2014-06-10 : > If 4.05 or 3.86 acted nicely, this would mean a bug. OK, so, with unpatched official binaries: 3.86 ---- pxelinux.0 Loads fine, assumes terminal width 15, displays menu, but then freezes (I suspect it does not process any input from the serial port) gpxelinux.0 Displays: PXE->EB: !PXE at 9E64:0060, entry point at 9E64:00F6 UNDI code segment

Recently, I decided to pull out a new model laptop for testing related to my job at work. Dell Latitiude E6400, BIOS A14. Normally I have it set to boot CD, USB, Net, then HDD and noticed that with PXELINUX-4.02 and 'LOCALBOOT 0', it hung on me before leaving the PXE stack. I then tried 3.86 and it worked. 4.00 and 4.01 both hung when I tested them as well. Changing to 'LOCALBOOT

On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Wissam Shoukair <wissams at mellanox.com> wrote: > Hi Gene, > > More information about this? > > I have found in the syslinux git that this commit id is the last good > commit: > > commit 41c29c26d70fde563d7c255872bbadad87a39dfa (tag: > refs/tags/syslinux-5.02-pre3) > Author: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming at intel.com> >

It depends on the exact memory map of the system. Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 7:31 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: >> On 06/28/2013 04:07 PM, Gene Cumm wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> >wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Ady <ady-sf

Hello, A couple of months back there was this message on the list. http://syslinux.zytor.com/archives/2010-October/015459.html I have exactly the same result on just a few types of machines. Acer Tavelmate 8372 and 5742 InsydeH2O Bios v1.05 Broadcom UNDI PXE 2.1 V 14.0.8 It started after I upgrades pxelinux.0 to version 3.86 Versions tested and got the recursing: 3.86, 3.85, 3.84 and 3.83 On

>Message: 6 >Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 07:35:30 -0400 >From: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> >To: Wissam Shoukair <wissams at mellanox.com> >Cc: For discussion of Syslinux and tftp-hpa <syslinux at zytor.com> >Subject: Re: [syslinux] syslinux (pxelinux.0) debug prints >Message-ID: > <CAD0Rxem_P4kOycVcSZUuaTjdKe=Gm5MLTjO6P6dMkbtsLOrVNQ at

On 06/28/2013 04:07 PM, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> But, in Syslinux 4.06, there is linux.c32, which is a sort of >>> introduction to Syslinux 5.xx (please allow me to be not strictly >>> accurate in

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 7:31 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: > On 06/28/2013 04:07 PM, Gene Cumm wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> But, in Syslinux 4.06, there is linux.c32, which is a sort of

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Philipp Hahn <hahn at univention.de> wrote: > Hello Ady, > > On 27.08.2014 16:46, Ady wrote: >>> On 01.08.2014 19:22, Ady wrote:>> On 24.07.2014 17:32, Gene Cumm wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Philipp Hahn <hahn at univention.de> >>> wrote: >>>>>>> On 24.07.2014

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: > >> But, in Syslinux 4.06, there is linux.c32, which is a sort of >> introduction to Syslinux 5.xx (please allow me to be not strictly >> accurate in this sentence in this context). >> >> Booting with any

Hi Gene, Am 05.07.2016 um 12:42 schrieb Gene Cumm: > Version 6.03. Is this a distribution build or fresh from the > binary/source archive from kernel.org without any running of 'make'? it's actually a freshly downloaded lpxelinux.0 from kernel.org. I get: $ md5sum lpxelinux.0 d77a175ea1a0a8c05b315d179992e1bd lpxelinux.0 >> nothing more. Sniffing revealed that there are

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 08:42:15AM -0400, Gene Cumm via Syslinux wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 5:54 AM,

> On 9/23/2015 12:14 AM, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > > About your customers' setup... > > Are they using official binaries downloaded from kernel.org? > > Yes. Stock versions, no local modifications. > > > Which exact version of Syslinux are they using? > > I've tried versions 3.86, 4.07, 6.01, 6.03. > We can only generally use 4.07 or less

Hello Ady, On 27.08.2014 16:46, Ady wrote: >> On 01.08.2014 19:22, Ady wrote:>> On 24.07.2014 17:32, Gene Cumm wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Philipp Hahn <hahn at univention.de> >> wrote: >>>>>> On 24.07.2014 13:52, Gene Cumm wrote: >> ... >>>>>> Your special build gets the gateway working, but the