similar to: pxelinux localboot enhancement

Hi, How do I view the libvirt virsh domxml-to-native function implementation? I think this function contains some error. Because we use libvirt to manage some host and vms on vmware hypervisor. We use openenbula generate a template for libvirt ,such as my attachment windows2008.xml. but when i use domxml-to-native to convert xml file to vmware config file vmx as below. This may not be

Hi, When I connect to a Cisco router and issue the show ip interface command, the output is similar as follows: Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol Ethernet0/0 192.168.12.1 YES NVRAM up up Serial0/0 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down Ethernet0/1 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down

>First, I was looking for the actual values.? >For a VM with (among other values): > config.version = "8" > virtualHW.version = "10" > ethernet0.virtualDev = "e1000" > guestOS = "rhel6-64" > firmware = "efi" > I see: > option-93 = 0x07 > option-60 ="PXEClient:Arch:00007:UNDI:003016" OK I take

You have the session target as the IP address of the router's own ethernet interface. You probably want that to be the address of the Asterisk server instead. I also highly recommend you use full duplex ethernet, as voice packets don't really like to be restransmitted when a collision happens. -d > Message: 10 > From: "Bartosz Jozwiak" <bartek@cq-link.sr> >

On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Patrick Masotta <masottaus at yahoo.com> wrote: > >>First, I was looking for the actual values. >>For a VM with (among other values): > >> config.version = "8" >> virtualHW.version = "10" >> ethernet0.virtualDev = "e1000" >> guestOS = "rhel6-64" >> firmware =

On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 12:52:21PM +0000, Roman Kagan wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 11:01:43AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 09:01:16AM +0000, Roman Kagan wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 05:29:31PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > This patch is just for discussion. There are still a couple of issues > > > >

On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 12:01 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 09:01:16AM +0000, Roman Kagan wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 05:29:31PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > This patch is just for discussion. There are still a couple of issues > > > that I'm trying to fix. > > > > Sorry if I missed the

Hello, everyone. Right now, we are trying launch our own PBX system based on Asterisk(Fedora) with Cisco 2611. Cisco has 2 port FXO card installed on it. For testing, I have 2611 hooked into phone line with number of xxx-xxx-xxxx fine. (I'll call it F). Using softphone, I can dial in extension 1001 on asterisk, which should talk to cisco. After initial connection to Asterisk, I have try to

On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 09:01:16AM +0000, Roman Kagan wrote: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 05:29:31PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > This patch is just for discussion. There are still a couple of issues > > that I'm trying to fix. > > Sorry if I missed the original discussion on that, but why is copying > the static IP configuraition even considered to be a good

On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 01:18:49PM +0100, Fabien Dupont wrote: > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 12:01 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 09:01:16AM +0000, Roman Kagan wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 05:29:31PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > This patch is just for discussion. There are still a couple of

On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Patrick Masotta <masottaus at yahoo.com> wrote: >> I use Syslinux 6.03 EFI64 on a VMware Workstation 10 VM on >> 10.0.2 on Linux. >> > w/o any problem? Yes. > Me too, I just send the ""corresponding"" syslinux.efi >> Are they actually transferring the syslinux.efi files? > > sure > >> What

Hi, I am creating a guest with following description for interfaces in the xml using virsh create xml command. For some reason, the guest interface names in the VM dont match the names specified in the xml. Is there a way to make guest interface names predictable? Following is the qemu version on host dpkg --list | grep -i qemu ii qemu-kvm 1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.10

>/> This allows us to bind the UUID to IP, and then pxelinux branches based />/> on the IP... />/> /> > You can also tell dhcpd to generate an option 209 from the UUID, if you > prefer. It is doable from dhcpd.conf, however when adding a node, one must do: * add uuid entry to dhcpd.conf * restart dhcp It is not always desirable (or convinient) when managing

On 4/4/19 2:02 PM, PR PR wrote: > Hi, > > I am creating a guest with following description for interfaces in the > xml using virsh create xml command. For some reason, the guest interface > names in the VM dont match the names specified in the xml. Is there a > way to make guest interface names predictable? For qemu (which you've indicating you're using) there

HI, I have been pulling my hair out trying to get a Cisco MC3810 to interface my Asterisk box with a T1. I am able to make outgoing calls but incoing calls never reach my Asterisk box. The cisco give a fast busy when I try to call one of the DID's. When playing around with the dial-peers I can get the cisco to pick up the call, but then it forwards the call back to the ANI that is dialing.

Is your passion for Open Source software stronger than the evil organizational forces (aka workplace idiosyncrasies) which try to blunt your effectiveness? Do you yearn for the freedom to truly contribute as per your own terms? Are you forced to clothe your Open Source mind & body with "proprietary clothes"? If you replied positively to any of the above, it''s time to

Hi, I had previously posted about connecting an AS5300 to * via SIP/H323. I got it to work via SIP, but only 1 call at a time would work, and if a user from the * side hung up, the cisco would'nt catch the hangup. I an now trying to hook up to the cisco via E1, with a Sangoma A101 card in my * box. I would like it such that I call from * via E1/PRI to the cisco, and call out via R2 to

Bare test code: My simple Java test class source and R test code follow: public class RJavTest { public static void main(String[]args) { RJavTest rJavTest=new RJavTest(); } public final static String conStg="testString"; public final static double con0dbl=10000001; public final static double[]con1Arr=new double[] { 10001,10002,10003,10004,10005,10006 }; public final static

We have an old Asterisk 1.8.7.0 system desperately need to keep alive for another 6 months or so. We had all kinds of hardware problems, so we virtualized it. Now, random extensions ring once and go straight to voicemail. I went to one of the affected extensions and changed the ring time from the default (20) to 26. Still one ring. I changed it to 30. Now I get two rings. Other extensions ring

Duncan: You may have it right-I took one phone and set the ring time to 60 seconds. I now get about 4 rings on that one. I wonder how I can change the timing source. Thomas M. Peters | Sr. Systems Administrator | tpeters at mcts.org<mailto:tpeters at mcts.org> Desk: 414.343.1720 | Helpdesk: x3400 or helpdesk at mcts.org<mailto:helpdesk at mcts.org> Milwaukee County Transit System