similar to: tftpd-hpa wrong data

I've been seeing a problem lately that I thought I'd run by this list to see if it's familiar to anyone. We've been running tftpd from tftp-hpa (at first version 0.29, but recently version 0.34) on DigitalUNIX 4.0F, serving files off of an NFS filesystem (from a very busy server). The daemon is started as: /noc/bin/tftpd -v -p -l -m /noc/etc/tftp.filename-translations \

I am trying to tftp from a cisco router on my lan, but it is not working. All I see are these errors in the log. I can "tftp localhost" without a problem as well. Any suggestions on what I can check next? I don't see too much troubleshooting available search via google. Thanks. [root at 170 chadr]# uname -a Linux 2.6.16-1.2111_FC4 #1 Sat May 20 19:59:40 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386

Antigen for Exchange found Gizn.pif matching FILE FILTER= *.pif file filter. The file is currently Purged. The message, "Have a humour Lady Day", was sent from konkurs and was discovered in IMC Queues\Inbound located at WRQ/Seattle/ABRA.

Thanks for pointing this out. Applied in 3b3bc3675519e1530adab27480196eb3f1a458bc Note that I've been adding some code in that branch to support the tftp WRQ from libupload when running with lpxelinux. 2015-09-02 12:18 GMT+02:00 Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com>: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Erwan Velu via Syslinux > <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > Hi

tftp keeps timing out when I try to transfer files. I intend to use tftp with G4U to clone a standard workstation. I am testing it between two Dell poweredge servers running CentOS 4.3. "chkconfig --list |grep tftp" shows tftp up and running on both boxes. When connected "tftp>status" shows it is talking to the other box "tptp>trace" shows "sent WRQ

> Isn't the server complaining because port 7012 is unreachable? Not the > other way around? It really doesn't matter to the server what the value > of the source port is from the client. > > Looking at your network packet dump from a previous email, > > Source Destination Protocal SPort DPort Description > 10.0.0.100 10.0.0.1 tftp 1479

My office is currently using WRQ Reflections as it was FIPS compliant. But this option is an expense that we'd like to get rid of if possible. Putty is not an option for us since it uses it's own OpenSSL libs and we need it FIPS enabled. I've been able to build OpenSSL 0.9.8o and enable the fipcanister.lib and create the openssl executables and libraries. I've been able to find

Hi folks, I've been off for a pretty long time and I'm trying to resume a little bit. While testing HDT I found some serious bugs in HDT's CLI mode but also took the time to update the DMI detection tables. Please find my hw_update branch which is in sync with the current git tree. https://github.com/ErwanAliasr1/syslinux/commits/hw_update Erwan,

> > Have you tried 5.10 in your environment on a BIOS machine to see whether > that works and which port numbers it uses? > > -- > Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center > Hi Matt, I think I've found the problem. In /core/fs/pxe/tftp.c in function tftp_open: First you do a core_udp_connect to port 69 (TFTP) at line 264. -> source port = x After that

Hi Denis, > could you please take a look at which process is taking so much RAM? > Is there a pile of smbd process around? If you are using Bind-dlz, how > much memory named is eating? Is is the increase in RAM consumption is > linear over time? > > If it is a "samba" process that is eating all the RAM, please check > the PID and the samba-tool processes

I'm new to this list, so feel free to update me on any rules that I seem not to be familiar with. I'm looking at some strange behavior on a _very_ barebones installation. I'd like to get some feedback on possible logical explanations. * What I'm seeing: The md5sum of all of my binaries in /usr/bin and /usr/sbin are changing exactly one hour after installation of CentOS-4.3.

Hi, on a system RedHat 8.0, only on this, not on other various RedHat8.0, I have see the follow strange error in /var/log/{messages,boot.log} ..... After the boot all it seems to work, the modules is loads.... I have already tried to install other versions of kernel but the problem is always the same one :-(( Someone has some idea of what is happening? Thanks... Dario Lesca

I get some failing tests from compiler-rt. FAIL: cfi :: cross-dso/stats.cpp (30831 of 30893) ******************** TEST 'cfi :: cross-dso/stats.cpp' FAILED ******************** Script: -- /usr/local/google/home/prazek/llvm-build-release/./bin/clang -fuse-ld=gold -flto -fsanitize=cfi -fwhole-program-vtables --driver-mode=g++ -fsanitize-cfi-cross-dso -fvisibility=default -DSHARED_LIB -fPIC

Hi, We upgraded a legacy (NT4) domain from 3.6 series to 4.8 and then 4.9.4 samba version (using sernet subscription packages / debian stable) The setup is composed of 4 DCs with each 2 CPU/16GB RAM. We currently have ~700 user accounts / ~600 computers / ~150 groups Our mail setup, SSO, ... query the 4 DCs constantly. Every 5 to 10 days the RAM consumption and CPU usage (due to kswapd)

I have found that this server, <snip> debug1: Remote protocol version 1.99, remote software version 3.1.0 F-SECURE SSH - Process Software SSH for OpenVMS debug1: no match: 3.1.0 F-SECURE SSH - Process Software SSH for OpenVMS </snip> does not follow the IETF secsh draft [1] related to the SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_PASSWD_CHANGEREQ message. <snip> ... Normally, the server responds

Darren, > -----Original Message----- > From: Darren Tucker [mailto:dtucker at zip.com.au] > Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 11:08 PM > To: Scott Rankin > Subject: Re: SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_PASSWD_CHANGEREQ and 3.1.0 > F-SECURE SSH - Pr oces s Software SSH for OpenVMS > > > Scott Rankin wrote: > >>That will depend on which versions exhibit the problems. Is it >

I sent in a patch a week or so ago for a problem a customer of mine was seeing when trying to connect to their OpenVMS system with an 3.8.1p2 OpenSSH client (running on a linux box or in cygwin) and trying to login to an account who had an expired password. The problem continues although now it has nothing to do with what my patch handled as they have since upgraded their SSH software on the VMS