similar to: Problem building syslinux

Hi Ashish, Which CentOS version you using? > If it is CentOS 6 then instead of building it from source, you can use IUS > repo which has latest php packages. > Below is the link for the packages in IUS repo for CentOS 6. > <http://dl.iuscommunity.org/pub/ius/stable/Redhat/6/x86_64/repoview/> > I'm using CentOS 7. I'll check to see if I can get php version 5.6.7

Am 13.03.2015 um 11:23 schrieb Timo Sirainen: > On 12 Mar 2015, at 21:09, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: >> >> /usr/lib64/dovecot/stats/libstats_mail.so >> >> why in the world a new sub-directory containing just one so-file enforcing pakcage buildsers to change SPEC files? > > So that external plugins can add more files in there and extend

Hi. Which CentOS version you using? If it is CentOS 6 then instead of building it from source, you can use IUS repo which has latest php packages. Below is the link for the packages in IUS repo for CentOS 6. <http://dl.iuscommunity.org/pub/ius/stable/Redhat/6/x86_64/repoview/> --Regards Ashishkumar S. Yadav On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Tim Dunphy <bluethundr at gmail.com>

Hey all, I'm attempting to build a spec file of php 5.6.7 - the latest stable - into an rpm. And it's failing with this set of errors: Processing files: php-5.6.7-1.el7.x86_64 warning: File listed twice: /etc/rc.d/init.d/php-fpm error: Symlink points to BuildRoot: /usr/bin/phar -> /home/bluethundr/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/php-5.6.7-1.el7.x86_64/usr/bin/phar.phar warning: File listed twice:

Hello. I have problems to compile Dovecot2.2.13 with rpmbuild using options: ./configure \ --prefix=/usr \ --with-ssl=openssl \ --with-ssldir=/etc/ssl \ --sysconfdir=/etc \ --without-vpopmail \ --with-pam \ --without-bsdauth \ --without-sql \ --without-nss \ --without-ldap \ --without-pgsql \

The rpm target was added after 1.8 was released so I guess you're not using CVS version. I also made several changes to the spec file which you might be interested in. The current version is attached. Reid. On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 21:02 +1200, David Kuestler wrote: > There doesn't appear to be an rpm target in the Makefile. > My spec file is derived from the included spec file

Am 06.03.2017 um 16:06 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:48:32 +0100 > Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> well, there is nothing different when you use rpmbuild and chose the >> prefix you want besides that: >> >> * cleanup of orphan files >> * simpe upgarde/downgrade because you have your prebuild .rpm files

On 23/11/17 18:39, Andrew W wrote: > Im trying to learn how to create RPMs but am a little confused by the > spec file. OK. I don't see a reply that answer your questions directly, so here I go... > > Im trying to package up some Python scripts, rather than binary files, > and I want them to be installed in a subdirectory under /usr/local > which I shall refer to as

Hi, Is anyone working on getting LLVM into Fedora Extras? This would allow anyone with FC-5 or greater to simply "yum install llvm" without any other preparation. If no one here is working on this, I can start the Fedora Extras new package process, which should only take a few weeks to complete. LLVM has been on my "planned packages" list for a while now. Thanks, Adam

I have seen posts about this problem, but have had trouble finding how/if it was resolved. I am trying to upgrade from syslinux-3.11 to syslinux-3.86 on RHEL5. On 3.86, when it performs a local boot from hard disk, it just keeps looping back into PXE boot again instead of booting from the hard disk. It will perform a system install just fine, but when it switches to localboot after the install,

The current build of iptables does not appear to include some modules. Among these are ipt_recent.so, a very handy module in deflecting the current flurry of sshd dictionary attacks. Lineox appears to have the same problem. This is because the RedHat source rpm spec file is not explicit in the kernel directory location and that omission affects these few modules. Required changes in the

Hi, we are an email hosting provider and we are looking at xapian to improve our user experience about email search. So we staring to build xapian 1.4.15 on Centos 7 with your xapian-core.spec and move it and the source code in /root/rpmbuild/SPECS and SOURCE, but we have this error after run "rpmbuild -ba": [...] Elaborazione file: xapian-core-devel-1.4.15-1.x86_64 errore: File

On Monday 11 March 2019 14:28:38 Pete Biggs wrote: > > However, as I went for bigger modules, anything that had dependences > > were then failing as the dependencie were installed OK but then did not > > appear to be available. > A number of things you can do. The sort of recommended way is to > package the perl modules into an RPM and install them that way (so that >

It built just fine in mock, results here http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/tmp/mtr6/ -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Digimer" <lists at alteeve.ca> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Sent: Tuesday, 8 March, 2016 00:05:59 > Subject: [CentOS] Can anyone compile

Hi all, I was trying to rebuild mtr (http://vault.centos.org/6.7/os/Source/SPackages/mtr-0.75-5.el6.src.rpm) and I keep getting: ==== Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.gu9Ds0 + umask 022 + cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD + '[' /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/mtr-0.75-5.el6.x86_64 '!=' / ']' + rm -rf /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/mtr-0.75-5.el6.x86_64 ++ dirname

Hi, For some reason I've never been able to build x64 dovecot rpm package, no matter how I try, I'm still getting lib64 errors, first tried few years on centos 5, ok I know this is old distro, then few years tried with centos 6 (and wrote here also - CentOS x64 compilation fails), supported distro, no luck, now installed centos 7 and still no luck, so seems it's not about centos or

Well, but not for centos 5 and also these rpm are including a lot stuff what I don't need. But I will check the src rpm -s from repo and diff these specs with my current ones. Mart Aki Tuomi wrote: > We provide rpm packages for centos 6&7 at https://repo.dovecot.org if you want > to try them? > > Aki >> On 15/12/2019 13:01 Mart Pirita < mart at e-positive.ee

I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was asking if anyone tried building it themselves and, if so, did they have the same issue as I describe below? Alternatively, any tips/advice on solving my build issue would be helpful. digimer On 07/03/16 07:29 PM, Nux! wrote: > It built just fine in mock, results here > http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/tmp/mtr6/ >

<!doctype html> <html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div> We provide rpm packages for centos 6&7 at https://repo.dovecot.org if you want to try them? </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> Aki </div> <blockquote type="cite"> <div> On

Thanks for the reply Laine. My problem is that dnsmasq is masking dhcpd, xCAT uses dhcpd for PXE stuff. If dnsmasq answer DHCP requests the PXE boot won' t work. I want to see the logs for ensuring the dnsmasq is not masking dhcpd. Regards, 2018-06-18 11:39 GMT-03:00 Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com>: > On 06/18/2018 09:16 AM, Daniel. wrote: >> Cool, thanks!! Does it have logs?