similar to: Root-NFS not mounting using PXELinux - error 101

Hi, during the past weeks i tried to set up a network through a cipe tunnel, building a vpn to some road warriers. With few words, the tunnel is etablished, and at the tcp/ip level everything works fine. NET A : 192.168.0.0/26 NET B : 192.168.102.0/26 trans-net : 192.168.101.0/26 in ascii-art, it looks like this: eth0:192.168.0.5 +-----------+ cipcb0:192.168.101.1

Is it possible to configure 2 virtual nics in the same ip range ? Here is what I am trying. **** This works **************** cat nw1.xml <network> <name>nw1</name> <domain name='nw1' /> <forward mode='nat' dev='eth2'/> <ip address='192.168.101.1' netmask='255.255.255.0'> <dhcp> <range

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 01:59:42AM -0700, Srinivas_G_Gowda@dell.com wrote: > Is it possible to configure 2 virtual nics in the same ip range ? Nope, that's unsupported. We need to key various things off the IP address + mask used for the NIC, so you can't have multiple nets with the same address + mask. > Here is what I am trying. > > > **** This works ****************

Yesterday i had it working, today it breaks.. :( But at least i've turned on logging and can pass you the relevant section of the log ;) When i try to connect to the share 'web', NT throws an error 'The specified group does not exist' and refuses to connect. I'm using virtually the same smb.conf file; I've tried it without the first 3 lines in [global], same

Thanks Daniel. Why was I trying to do something like this ? Two reasons 1. I was referring to ( Figure 18.4. Virtual network switch running dnsmasq) https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html-single/Virtualization_Administration_Guide/index.html#sect-network-protocols that appears to be two virtual nics sharing the same IP range .. !!! 2. was

Originally, the test is on a tiger with RHEL installed. The fs is ext3 as default. Then the oops came up. I've installed the test kernel on another tiger with Suse, reiserfs as default. The kernel can boot successfully without any trouble. Is it a known issue? Or what causes this happen? thanks, -zhen -----Original Message----- From: Wang, Zhenyu Z Sent: 2004?7?20? 16:59 To: linux-ia64 at

oh, I am using: $ quota -V Quota utilities version 3.13. Compiled with RPC and EXT2_DIRECT Bugs to mvw at planets.elm.net, jack at suse.cz are there any special versions out there for v2 quotas? thanks, Christian. ------------- Hi list, having used ext2/3 for years now I have to admit that I've never dealt with filesystem quotas yet. But now I want to use them and I'm rather puzzled

Hi I looked, but I didn't find it: I need an array [0 to 101] where each element is a list (the result of Kest in spatstat). I.e. I want to do: A[2] <- Kest(pp1) A[3] <- Kest(pp2) ... A[101] <- Kest(pp100) How can I create A ? Rainer -- Rainer M. Krug, Dipl. Phys. (Germany), MSc Conservation Biology (UCT) Department of Conservation Ecology University of Stellenbosch Matieland

Hi, I saw this setup on the web .. is this looks right to you ? The security set to user level, which use linux samba local login and password. Why this needs to set workgroup = SAMBAGRP ? [global] workgroup = SAMBAGRP security = user passdb backend = tdbsam Thanks

I have been successful with configuring TCP on a 2.4.23 kernel that was built with the "IP: kernel level autoconfiguration" turned on with the following append line: APPEND initrd=rootfs.gz root=/dev/ram0 rw ip=192.168.0.175::192.168.0.1:255.255.255.0 ^ ^ ^ | |

Thank you. Can I find any BIOS interrupt to wait on packet arrival NIC interrupt that can be used in COM32 program? And, how do I extend pxelinux.0 that enables this feature in PXE UDP RECEIVE INTERRUPT? Is gPXE has such kind of interrupt? On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:30 AM, <syslinux-request at zytor.com> wrote: > Send Syslinux mailing list submissions to > syslinux at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|trivial |enhancement Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Priority|P2

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2004-09-24 17:40 CEST ------- Actually,

./show_bug.cgi?id=101 kaber at trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Comment #3 from kaber at trash.net 2008-04-02 13:39 ------- I'd probably take a

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101 ------- Additional Comments From wendyp at cray.com 2002-04-23 08:43 ------- updated patches for 22 april snapshot: --- session.c.orig Mon Apr 22 14:36:13 2002 +++ session.c Mon Apr 22 16:31:15 2002 @@ -64,6 +64,10 @@ #define is_winnt (GetVersion() < 0x80000000) #endif +#ifdef _CRAY +#include <tmpdir.h> +#endif /*

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101 wendyp at cray.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From wendyp at cray.com 2002-07-23 08:44

I updated to the latest CVS tonight and now DTMF detection does not appear to work on my Cisco 7960 sip phones (can't check voice mail etc). The asterisk console is displaying these messages over and over again any time a DTMF tone is sent: NOTICE[15376]: File rtp.c, Line 292 (ast_rtp_read): Unknown RTP codec 101 received Downgraded to a known working CVS of about three weeks ago, and

I know there are several folks hanging around the list that resell VoIP products, I'd be interested in getting your info off-list as I'm trying to persuade someone to get me a budgetone 101 for Christmas ;) I've checked the yahoo site, and they seem to only carry it in white.. Ideally, I'd like blue, so if you have it, please let me know. Also, I've been watching the list for

I just got a Budgetone 101 and I have it hooked to my * box. I thought I'd read somewhere that we can program the buttons on these phones to send DTMF tones, thereby effectively programming them. However, according to the user's manual, they have predefined SIP functionality. My dialplan implements the festures I want (transfer, message, stuff like that), so for uniformity, I'd just

Hi, I have just completed the deployment of a couple of Grandstream phones (for internal IP use) and was wondering how much harder it would be to deploy a Polycom IP 300 phone. The Grandstream was quite easy to deploy and gives us good voice quality over DSL, however from some of the previous posts I am see that some people had troubles with the Polycom 300. The variant I am looking at