similar to: How to plot survival data from multiple trials (simulations)?

Hi All. I've run into a problem with the plinear algorithm in nls that is confusing me. Assume the following reaction time data over 15 trials for a single unit. Trials are coded from 0-14 so that the intercept represents reaction time in the first trial. trl RT 0 1132.0 1 630.5 2 1371.5 3 704.0 4 488.5 5 575.5 6 613.0 7 824.5 8 509.0 9

Dear R gurus I am running a GLMM that looks at whether chimpanzees spend time in shade more than sun (response variable 'y': used cbind() on counts in the sun and shade) based on the time of day (Time) and the availability of shade (Tertile). I've included some random factors too which are the chimpanzee in question (Individual) and where they are in a given area (Zone). There are

Hi, I have the following code, the lines preceded by `>` being added at runtime (the snipped was also printed at runtime) define i32 @myfunc(i32 %pi) { entry: %pi_addr = alloca i32 ; <i32*> [#uses=3] %retval = alloca i32 ; <i32*> [#uses=2] %tmp = alloca i32 ; <i32*> [#uses=2] > %ptr32 = alloca i32

Hi, I'm sure this should be simple but I can't figure it out! I want to get the median survival calculated by the survfit function and use the value rather than just be able to print it. Something like this: library(survival) data(lung) lung.byPS = survfit(Surv (time, status) ~ ph.ecog, data=lung) # lung.byPS Call: survfit(formula = Surv(time, status) ~ ph.ecog, data = lung) 1

Hello, I have questions regarding penalized Cox regression using survival package (functions coxph() and ridge()). I am using R 2.8.0 on Ubuntu Linux and survival package version 2.35-4. Question 1. Consider the following example from help(ridge): > fit1 <- coxph(Surv(futime, fustat) ~ rx + ridge(age, ecog.ps, theta=1), ovarian) As I understand, this builds a model in which `rx' is

I was looking at how the model.frame method for lm works and comparing it to my own for coxph. The big difference is that I try to retain xlevels and predvars information for a new model frame, and lm does not. I use a call to model.frame in predict.coxph, which is why I went that route, but never noted the difference till now (preparing for my course in Nashville). Could someone shed light

Paul Martin wrote: > Hi, > I have the following code, the lines preceded by `>` being added at > runtime (the snipped was also printed at runtime) > > define i32 @myfunc(i32 %pi) { > entry: > %pi_addr = alloca i32 ; <i32*> [#uses=3] > %retval = alloca i32 ; <i32*> [#uses=2] > %tmp = alloca i32 ;

Calum had a long question about drawing survival curves after fitting a Weibull model, using pweibull, which I have not reproduced. It is easier to get survival curves using the predict function. Here is a simple example: > library(survival) > tfit <- survreg(Surv(time, status) ~ factor(ph.ecog), data=lung) > table(lung$ph.ecog) 0 1 2 3 <NA> 63 113 50 1

Hi, Is it normal to get intercept in the list of covariates in the output of survreg function with standard error, z, p.value etc? Does it mean that intercept was fitted with the covariates? Does Value column represent coefficients or some thing else? Regards, ------------------------------------------------- tmp = survreg(Surv(futime, fustat) ~ ecog.ps + rx, ovarian,

Nick, Thanks for the quick answer. Dereferencing the pointer does yield the same result in both cases but that's not what I want to do. I want to instrument the program dynamically and keep track of certain memory locations which is a problem if the same variable has different addresses for the static/dynamic code - as far I see this is what it's happening but I have no clue why. Paul On

Hi I am trying to understand how to get the validate() function in Design to work with the subset option. I tried this: ovarian.cph=cph(Surv(futime, fustat) ~ age+factor(ecog.ps)+strat(rx), time.inc=1000, x=T, y=T, data=ovarian) validate(ovarian.cph) #fine when no subset is used, but the following two don't work: > validate(ovarian.cph, subset=ovarian$ecog.ps==2) Error in

--- included message ---- Thus, my question is: *What common measures exists for ranking/measuring variable importance of participating variables in a CART model? And how can this be computed using R (for example, when using the rpart package)* ---end ---- Consider the following printout from rpart summary(rpart(time ~ age + ph.ecog + pat.karno, data=lung)) Node number 1: 228 observations,

Dear All: I have some questions about the output of coxph. Below is the input and output: ---------------------------------------- > coxph(formula = Surv(futime, fustat) ~ age + rx + ecog.ps, data = + ovarian, x = TRUE) Call: coxph(formula = Surv(futime, fustat) ~ age + rx + ecog.ps, data = ovarian, x = TRUE) coef exp(coef) se(coef) z p age 0.147 1.158

It seems to me that R returns the unpenalized log-likelihood for the ratio likelihood test when ridge regression Cox proportional model is implemented. Is this as expected? In the example below, if I am not mistaken, fit$loglik[2] is unpenalized log-likelihood for the final estimates of coefficients. I would expect to get the penalized log-likelihood. I would like to check if this is as expected.

Paul Martin wrote: > > Nick, > Thanks for the quick answer. > Dereferencing the pointer does yield the same result in both cases but > that's not what I want to do. I want to instrument the program > dynamically and keep track of certain memory locations which is a > problem if the same variable has different addresses for the > static/dynamic code - as far I see

I am trying to fit a lognormal distribution on interval-censored data. Some of my intervals have a lower bound of zero. Unfortunately, it seems like survreg() cannot deal with lower bounds of zero, despite the fact that plnorm(0)==0 and pnorm(-Inf)==0 are well defined. Below is a short example to reproduce the problem. Does anyone know why survreg() must behave that way? Is there an alternate

Hello, i have this dataset http://www.umass.edu/statdata/statdata/data/pharynx.txt. the variables GRADE, T_STAGE anda N_STAGE are qualitative or quantitative variables??? i only have this simple doubt...! another example: why in the dataset ovarian (library survival) the variable ecog.ps: ECOG performance status (1 is better, see reference) it is consider quantitative? Thank's for

Dear R users, My apologies for the simple question, as I'm starting to learn the concepts behind the Cox PH model. I was just experimenting with the survival and rms packages for this. I'm simply trying to obtain the expected survival time (as opposed to the probability of survival at a given time t). I can't seem to find an option from the "type" argument in the predict

Nick, Your solution works well if there is a store instruction in the function but in the case where there is none (i.e. the argument is passed on directly to another function), creating a store does not help to get the memory address of the variable which takes me back to my initial question at http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-May/022590.html - isn't there a way to obtain the

The coxme package has a ranef() method, as does lme4. I'm having trouble getting them to play together, as shown below. (The particular model in the example isn't defensible, but uses a standard data set.) The problem is that most of the time only one of lme4 or coxme will be loaded, so each needs to define the basic ranef function as well as a method for it. But when loaded together