similar to: swap_free messages in log

All, I am installing a BOXD915GAVL system and centos 4. The CPU is a 2.8 GIG celeron D with 1GIG memory and 120GIG Seagate drive. Is is VERY slow. What gives? Any other experience with something like this? It is installing but even after install when booting it is taking VERY long time to even get to the Checking new hardware screen. Thanks, Jerry -------------- next part -------------- An

I had a kernel crash last evening... This is what was in the /var/log/messages file. What should be my next step. I am using an Intel P4 2.4 GHZ, Intel motherboard 865 chipset, 2 software RAID 120GIG disks, 2.6.9-11.ELsmp kernel, and 2 asterisk TDM04B cards. System normally works great through the week, crash was sunday morning at 4:22 am. Thanks, Jerry

I am planning to increase the disk space on my desktop system. It is running CentOS 5.9 w/XEN. I have two 160Gig 2.5" laptop (2.5") SATA drives in two slots of a 4-slot hot swap bay configured like this: Disk /dev/sda: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End

Everyone, I recently added a 300gig Seagate sata drive on a Centos 5.0 and have a couple of questions. The drive was recognized with the device as /dev/sdc. The system came with some SCCI drives that are labeled as /dev/sda and /dev/sdb. I was surprised that the sata drives used sdc. Are the sata drives considered more like SCCI or IDE drives? The real problem occurred when I tried to

Hello, I have recompiled a Linux 2.4.18 kernel on my Sparc and I receive some oops when quick disk access are performed. For example : I download some files on a local server with ncftp (-TR directory), and ncftp hangs up (with kernel oops !). I cannot umount the device and I must reboot the station. For information, my sparc is a SparcStation 5 (85 MHz) with 160 Mbytes and 3 SCSI

Alrighty. I'm having a hell of a time and I need help. I'll try to give as much information as possible. ---------- HARDWARE ---------- MB: Supermicro PDSBM-LN2+ Intel 946GZ ICH7R + Intel? 82573 Memory: Crucial 512Mb, 1Gb, 2Gb modules matched to above MB. Processors: Intel Celeron 420 Conroe-L, 1.6GHz 512KB 64-bit Intel Core 2 Duo E6320, 1.86Ghz 4Mb 64-bit Intel Pentium E2140

hi all! back in Aug several of you assisted me in solving a problem where one of my drives had dropped out of (or been kicked out of) the raid1 array. something vaguely similar appears to have happened just a few mins ago, upon rebooting after a small update. I received four emails like this, one for /dev/md0, one for /dev/md1, one for /dev/md125 and one for /dev/md126: Subject: DegradedArray

now that i am done ranting. i have a question. I received this error today and i think it was today only so far, but the error is as follows. hda: drive_cmd: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } hda: drive_cmd: error=0x04Aborted Command i did some googling and found some stuff...but some said go out and get another drive this one is going to hard drive heaven very soon... and other

One of my CentOS boxes has started giving me errors. The box is CentOS-4.4 (i386) fully updated. It has a pair of SATA drives in a software raid 1 configuration. The errors I see are: ata1: command 0xca timeout, stat 0x50 host_stat 0x24 ata1: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete } Info fld=0x1e22b8, Current sda: sense key No Sense ata2: command 0xca timeout, stat 0x50

System is CentOS 6 all up to date, previously had two drives in MD RAID configuration. md0: sda1/sdb1, 20 GB, OS / Partition md1: sda2/sdb2, 1 TB, data mounted as /home Installed kmod ZFS via yum, reboot, zpool works fine. Backed up the /home data 2x, then stopped the sd[ab]2 partition with: mdadm --stop /dev/md1; mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/sd[ab]1; Removed /home in /etc/fstab. Used

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Hi all, This morning I received this notification from mdadm: This is an automatically generated mail message from mdadm running on server-mail.mydomain.kom A Fail event had been detected on md device /dev/md1. Faithfully yours, etc. In /proc/mdstat I see this: Personalities : [raid1] md1 : active raid1 sdb2[2](F) sda2[0] 77842880 blocks [2/1] [U_] md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]

Le 04/12/2018 ? 23:50, Stephen John Smoogen a ?crit?: > In the rescue mode, recreate the partition table which was on the sdb > by copying over what is on sda > > > sfdisk ?d /dev/sda | sfdisk /dev/sdb > > This will give the kernel enough to know it has things to do on > rebuilding parts. Once I made sure I retrieved all my data, I followed your suggestion, and it looks

Greetings - The short story is that got my new install completed with the partitioning I wanted and using software raid, but after a reboot I ended up with a grub prompt, and do not appear to have a grub.cfg file. So here is a little history of how I got here, because I know in order for anyone to help me they would subsequently ask for this information. So this post is a little long, but

so, I installed a c6 system offsite today, had to do it in a hurry. box has 2 disks meant to be mirrored... I couldn't figure out how to get anaconda to build a LVM root on a mirror, so I ended up just installing a /boot and vg_system on sda and raid it later. every howto I find for linux says to half-raid the OTHER disk, COPY everything to it, then boot from it and wipe the first disk

Hi All, We tested the xm block-attach/detach command. It repeats block-attach/detach command for DomU and pv-on-hvm on HVM Domain. (block-attach -> block-detach -> block-attach -> block-detach -> ...) The block-attach command failed when repeating 256 times. It is because the channel had not been freed in blkfront. Therefore, it remain using the event channel. This patch is

Hi list, I'm new with UEFI and GPT. For several years I've used MBR partition table. I've installed my system on software raid1 (mdadm) using md0(sda1,sdb1) for swap, md1(sda2, sdb2) for /, md2 (sda3,sdb3) for /home. From several how-to concerning raid1 installation, I must put each partition on a different md devices. I've asked times ago if it's more correct create the

----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Milhollan" <mlm at pixelgate.net> To: "Jeff Boyce" <jboyce at meridianenv.com> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 7:18 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 install software Raid on large drives error > On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, Jeff Boyce wrote: > >>I am trying to install CentOS 7 into a new Dell Precision 3610. I have

Hi All, I have what I believe to be a pretty basic LVM & RAID setup on my CentOS 5 machine: Raid Partitions: /dev/sda1,sdb1 /dev/sda2,sdb2 /dev/sda3,sdb3 During the install I created a RAID 1 volume md0 out of sda1,sdb1 for the boot partition and then added sda2,sdb2 to a separate RAID 1 volume as well (md1). I then setup md1 as a LVM physical volume for volume group 'system'. I

I think I have solved my issue and would like some input from anyone who has done this for pitfalls, errors, or if I am just wrong. Centos 5.x, software raid, 250gb drives. 2 drives in mirror, one spare. All same size. 2 devices in the mirror, one boot (about 100MB), one that fills the rest of disk and contains LVM partitions. I was thinking of taking out the spare and adding a 500gb drive. I