similar to: reindexing

Hi! I'm using Dovecot 2.2.13 (Debian Jessie package 1:2.2.13-12~deb8u1) on my personal mail server (the address I'm writing from is on this server). I use Maildirs, I have fts + fts_squat enabled, and I have a problem with it for a long time - dovecot seems to not update the index always "incrementally". Yesterday I've finally made a test by telneting to imap port and

Hi, I'm not an expert, but am doing something similar (moving messages and training the spam filter). To detect the existence of new messages looking directly at the maildir can be a quick and dirty solution to get a trigger event. But to move or delete I think you should use 'doveadm' to search for all messages in your spam directory and get a list of all uids an guids. Then you

If you used MySQL FULLTEXT indexes and just upgraded to Rails 1.1, watch out for this one. Rails 1.1 now defaults to Ruby as your schema format. So instead of development-structure.sql, Rake will use schema.rb. That''s portable and good stuff overall but there is a slight compatibility issue. Ruby schema doesn''t know how to do FULLTEXT index syntax for MySQL. To work around it,

Hello. I am new to Ferret. I am using it through Acts as Ferret. Let''s say I have such a table, and all columns are indexed using the default behavior provided by acts_as_ferret: ARTICLES -id -year -body [1] A typical request will be "select id from articles where KEYWORDS % body". Will id be indexed for fulltext searching? clearly the fulltext index on id will never be

I tried adding a FULLTEXT search index to a table of mine in MySQL, only to discover that the InnoDB table format doesn''t seem to support this feature. Switching to the MyISAM table type seemed to work, but I seem to have some recollection that ActiveRecord transactions aren''t fully atomic on MyISAM tables. Is this true or am I just remembering wrong? If so, does anyone have

Can anyone point me to the proper syntax to build a FULLTEXT MySQL index via migrations? I''m really liking these things, and don''t want to step back into the world of manual intervention.

i''m using a table, that uses fulltext search and therefore the table type MyISAM everything works fine in production mode, but tests fail with ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: Mysql::Error: The used table type doesn''t support FULLTEXT indexes when looking in the test db it''s clear, that it''s using InnoDB, but even manually changing the table type does not help,

Hi Guys, I just wanted to take a moment to give some positive feedback regarding my experiences with Xapian recently. I've been doing a fair amount of research into search engines recently, as we have some fairly specific requirements with what we're attempting to do with them. Long story short, after a few weeks of playing around with just about everything under the sun (or at least,

Changing the vapply() behavior makes sense in principle. I analyzed the CRAN code base using the R parser and found 143 instances of calling vapply with USE.NAMES=FALSE. These would need to be inspected to understand the consequences of the change. For reference: /AzureML/R/datasets.R:226 /BBmisc/R/toRangeStr.R:33 /DBI/R/DBDriver.R:205 /Kmisc/R/str_rev.R:37 /Matrix/R/diagMatrix.R:98

Hi, So i''m trying to use acts_as_taggable with the acts_as_ferret plugin, where I have Post.rb model, which has a method tag_list made available through acts_as_taggable, as returns a string of associated tag words from the tags table (tag.rb). I''ve set up my Post.rb model in the following way. class Post < ActiveRecord::Base acts_as_taggable acts_as_ferret

just installed dovecot with fts_squat config attached after message. When i telnet to imap server and execute by hand 1 login user password select foldername search body "someword" it works fine, and at blazing speed except first run (indexing). i already indexed everything by doveadm index offline to prevent server overload if multiple users (after i tell them) will try fulltext

>> A few clients have 25K and more e-mail >> >> I thinking about use solr like: >> ?fts = solr >> ?fts_solr = debug url=http://IP:8983/solr/ (solr in external machine) >> >> Does it make sense ? use dovecot_indexes and fts ? >> What is the difference in performance? >> > Hi! > > Dovecot indexes are not actually related to FTS that

I''ve heard that using LIKE is very slow, but I see it being used a lot in examples, blogs etc. Is it really that bad? Since Rails doesn''t directly support Fulltext search, this is the easiest way to get searching done, right? Or are there any other easier ways? I''m using acts_as_indexed right now, but it still doesn''t do what LIKE does.

Hi, Recently, I was trying to play around with AAF and found that reindexing table is very slow. Then I started looking into Ferret performance and tried myself and found that it''s very fast. Then, I just used Ferret to index my table and it was also very fast. All good. Then why reindexing using AAF is slow. After sometime I found that in the AAF, it uses (:key => :id) in

Is this intentional? Closing the connection without warning doesn't seem like the best response... --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- % printf "1 select \"INBOX\"\n2 search body quack\n3 logout\n" | /opt/local/libexec/dovecot/imap * PREAUTH [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE SORT SORT=DISPLAY

Hello list, I wonder if someone has some tips on joining a ferret search with a database. I have a rails project using a postgresql backend and I would like to utilize the superb performance of ferret for fulltext searching. The problem is that I have to joined the result with the database as I have some user access rights to different documents to take into account. Does anyone have

The current full-text search will return the AND collection results,for example,if we use Article.search("aa bb"),then the articles that include "aa" and "bb" in the fields will be returned,how to return the articles that include "aa" OR "bb" effectly? A stumb method is to setup two queries respectly and collect them together with remove the

> On May 8, 2018, at 8:36 AM, Evans, Richard K. (GRC-H000) <richard.k.evans at nasa.gov> wrote: > > I?ve been tinkering and discovered that the link I need to read json data from is ?https? and there is a certificate warning that I have to click through from a browser. That might be my issue. Is there any way in the json package to tell it to ignore self-signed cert errors in a

Hi I have a question about tunning dovecot-2.2.36.x Mail was stared in storage via nfs in MAILDIR via /home/us/username at domain.ltd/MAILDIR/ I use additionally local dovecot_indexes via SSD disk (/var/dovecot_indexes%h) A few clients have 25K and more e-mail I thinking about use solr like: ?fts = solr ?fts_solr = debug url=http://IP:8983/solr/ (solr in external machine) Does it make sense ?

I started what I thought was going to be a 30 minute project on the train this morning to write a little timetracker for myself. Amongst other things (don''t have a model called Task as it conflicts with Rake at the moment, don''t have a model called Action as it disappears in the hash when you submit a form :-), I had to use Webrick as Lighty complained about an unknown