similar to: Re:2

A user logged in with a captial "L" for his username: Jul 7 12:30:31 postamt dovecot: auth(default): cache(Loser,10.47.64.227): miss Jul 7 12:30:31 postamt dovecot: auth(default): shadow(Loser,10.47.64.227): lookup Jul 7 12:30:31 postamt dovecot: auth(default): shadow(Loser,10.47.64.227): unknown user Jul 7 12:30:31 postamt dovecot: auth(default): cache(Loser,10.47.64.227): miss Jul

I am writing a rails app with my colleague who wrote a lot of the tests. He had to take a leave of absence due to a death in his family, and I am needing helps with changing the model so that the tests will pass in our spec file. Here is the model: class Worker < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :first_name, :last_name has_many :writings end Here is the spec:

Dear all, I have carried out a pairwise comparison study that I want to analyze using the BradleyTerry package to establish a rank order of my stimuli. However, BT does not handle ties between stimuli, so I need to find those in my data before I can use that model. The code below goes from the format of my result file(s) to a data frame suitable for BT, but as you can see, there are some ties. I

I don't see the problem with the following... the citations and baseball data work fine, but my simulated data seems to give BTm a headache. What am I missing? --- library(BradleyTerry) library(doBy) ng <- 100 players <- factor( sort( c( "jeff", "mike", "paul", "rich" ) ) ) np <- length( players ) p1 <- factor( c( rep( "jeff", ng )

Hello all, I would like to plan and analyse a study with "k" treatments (one of which is a "control"), with some binary outcome, in order to find the "best" treatment (e.g: the one with a high number of "successes"). If this was done with a fixed sample size, the analysis is well known. However, I would rather be able to "drop" treatment(s), if

Hello Everyone, ? I need to perform a sample size calculation using a drop the loser/keep the winner design. I've been searching for examples of how to do this using R but haven't found much. ? The most promising possibility thus far is an R?function called DrpLsrNRst. This appears in the book "Adaptive Design Theory and Implementation Using SAS and R". I found the function

I have been dragging my feet on remote display, and have just gotten VNC going to have SOMETHING to move off the start line. But I need the 'best' for different situations, so I want to rate them. 1 to 3 where 1 is the 'best' for the catagory and 3 the loser. VNC RDESKTOP FREENX Server memory Server cpu client memory client cpu bandwidth

I'm trying to filter calls that don't have a proper ANI. This is what I did: ; only if they a real-looking ANI exten=_1XXXXXX1118/_.N.,1,Newt,1118-config ; Otherwise, send them to the loser partyline exten=_1XXXXXX1118,1,Goto(outtrunk,19096611234,1) This properly deals with null ANIs, but for some reason those with ten zeroes get matched by the first line. I also tried to be a bit more

Some list subscribers post in HTML. In this regard, the Shorewall list seems unique -- most lists that I subscribe to flame HTML posters unmercifully whereas this list is unusually tolerent. While the list server here at shorewall.net accepts and distributes these HTML posts, a growing number of MTAs serving list subscribers are rejecting this HTML list traffic. At least one MTA has gone so

Hi again, It seems that dev.set() will solve my problem. It took me quite a bit of time, search and frustration until i stumbled on dev.set ;-) Thanks anyway, Monica From: pisicandru@hotmail.comTo: r-help@r-project.orgSubject: [R] Question about making active a previously opened graphic deviceDate: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:02:40 +0000 Hi, I have opened 2 different graphic devices on screen

Subject pretty much says it all. (And *please* don't point me BROWSING.txt since I've been there done that and it still doesn't work) First let me vent... What a shit microsoft is for doing the following... creating a browsing protocol where the WINS server is dynamically elected from a possibly infinite set of machines; yet you need to hard code a static address in the

Welcome to "Ghetto" America! …...Yes, you heard me; I said "Ghetto" America! What is "Ghetto" America, I'm glad you asked. Before I go on please be warned, this explanation may not sit well with many of you, however it is no less true! "Ghetto" America is a society of individuals comprised primarily of African Americans who represent the

Hi, When compiling the cfrontend for Linux/PPC architecture on a powermac G5, i got the following error : -------------------------------Compilation error listing if [ -f stmp-dirs ]; then true; else touch stmp-dirs; fi make GCC_FOR_TARGET="/usr/local/home/cyrille/project/llvm/cfrontend/build/gcc/xgcc -B/usr/local/home/cyrille/project/llvm/cfrontend/build/gcc/

gcc 3.4.x builds LLVM incorrectly on x86_64. gcc 4.0 will get you much farther, but the llvm-test regression tests still have massive problems. Zhongxing Xu wrote: > The machine is a Dell workstation with xeon processors. The OS is RHEL > 4 AS x86_64 > gcc version is 3.4.6 > > I checked out the llvm-gcc from svn, configured with > ../llvm-gcc/configure

Cyrille Mescam wrote: > Hi, > > > When compiling the cfrontend for Linux/PPC architecture on a powermac > G5, i got > the following error : I hate to ask a silly question, but are you using "make bootstrap" to build the cfrontend? Your output looks like gccas is being given a native code assembly language file to parse, and I seem to recall that that happens if

The machine is a Dell workstation with xeon processors. The OS is RHEL 4 AS x86_64 gcc version is 3.4.6 I checked out the llvm-gcc from svn, configured with ../llvm-gcc/configure --prefix=$HOME/llvm-gcc-install --enable-llvm=$HOME/llvmobj/ --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-checking --disable-shared --disable-multilib and get the following error message: make

After months where my wife was patiently playing WoW with appalling graphics because WoW doesn't really support OpenGL any more, and an even worse frame rate despite really low graphics settings, I finally got fed up with the fact that I cannot, under any circumstances, get sound out of Mangler and WoW at the same time even though the Wine audio test works fine, and was getting zero support on

Already have concerning gcc 3.4: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1056 As for llvm-test issues, quite frankly I don't know how well they're expected to work on x86_64. No one has jumped in and said they run fine on their x86_64 system. Maybe they're code generator bugs, or maybe they're portability issues for FreeBSD (though I never saw such massive problems with 32-bit

On Jan 9, 2007, at 9:48 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > gcc 3.4.x builds LLVM incorrectly on x86_64. > > gcc 4.0 will get you much farther, but the llvm-test regression tests > still have massive problems. Please file bug reports on these. Thanks! Evan > > Zhongxing Xu wrote: >> The machine is a Dell workstation with xeon processors. The OS is >> RHEL >> 4 AS

I'm having some trouble getting llvm-gcc4 to compile. It's unable to compile darwin-crt3.c. It's mentioning "Complex expression. Absolute segment assumed." but I'm not sure if that's a real error message. Has anyone run into this before? I'm running on a G4 apple 10.4.8, kernel version 8.6.0. I googled around and found a bug with the same error message: