similar to: trouble with maxbw

On OpenSolaris 2009.06 I created a flow, half a dozen VNICs, and I set some properties, and everything was working, then I rebooted my system and everything disappeared from show-vnic, show-flow, and show-prop. When I tried to re-create the objects, dladm said they already existed. While I could not see the objects, I could delete them. Example: # dladm show-vnic # dladm create-vnic -l bge0

Hi, Pradeep: I believe you had some questions about modifying bandwidth for flows/VNICs. I believe that should be fine in the recently released bits, could you please check and lets know if you still have any questions about this. Bandwidth limits can be modified using: links: dladm set-linkprop -p maxbw=<value> linkname flows: flowadm set-flowprop -p maxbw=<value> flowname (I

I decided to take a stab at 6601421 dladm set-linkprop should support multiple -p options along with some related linkprop fixes, but when I looked into dladm.c, was surprised to find that "dladm_parse_props()" is called from do_create_aggr and do_create_vlan in addition to the expected (by me, at least) do_create_vnic *linkprop functions. What happened here? Why do we pass in

Recently I found that the mac_srs_rx_poll_ring thread may never stop in kernel, please see the following mpstat, cpu 2 is in 100% kernel usage, but no syscalls and no interrupts. CPU minf mjf xcal intr ithr csw icsw migr smtx srw syscl usr sys wt idl 0 0 0 0 300 100 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 1 14 0 0 134 68 134 1

The minimum is set at 1200Kbits/second. However, in testing, if I set that for a VNIC, the domU gets no traffic at all (maybe the occassional packet). Is the minimum too low? If I set a maximum of 2000Kbits/second, I get this from nicstat (expecting around 250Kbytes/s total: Time Int rKB/s wKB/s rPk/s wPk/s rAvs wAvs %Util Sat 04:35:38 xvm15_0 146.6 5.32 102.0

The minimum is set at 1200Kbits/second. However, in testing, if I set that for a VNIC, the domU gets no traffic at all (maybe the occassional packet). Is the minimum too low? If I set a maximum of 2000Kbits/second, I get this from nicstat (expecting around 250Kbytes/s total: Time Int rKB/s wKB/s rPk/s wPk/s rAvs wAvs %Util Sat 04:35:38 xvm15_0 146.6 5.32 102.0

Among other things, I run an http server on my home DSL line (6M/768kbit). The content includes several large image galleries, and when certain crawlers hit our server w/ multiple large image uploads, we end up with large ping time delays - sufficient to disrupt the kids'' on-line gaming. Attempts to control this with robots.txt has not be very successful; Solaris IPQoS appears quite

Hi all, Link protection is a new feature we are planning to introduce to Solaris and we would like to solicit your feedback on it. Please see attached document for details.

Following is a short description on assigning priorities to a link (via dladm). Flows will have a similar mechanism (via flowadm). thanks, -venu ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The components associated with a link or flow, such as Soft Ring Sets, Soft Rings and squeues, have kernel threads processing inbound/outbound packets. The scheduler

Dear All I have my CentOS server at @172.16.17.100 and my remote network element at @ 172.16.17.110 and both ones have Internet access . I need to virtually put the remote network element on the same LAN as my CentOS server to be touched with . In my application , both the ip addresses are as invalid ones and I cannot change them . Can you please let me know if there is a settings on the CentOS

Folks, I just posted an updated Crossbow virtualization architecture document. The new revision is available at: http://opensolaris.org/os/project/crossbow/Docs/crossbow-virt.pdf The main changes are the addition of support for multiple MAC addresses per client, and an explicit separation between consolidation private and project private MAC API entry points. See in particular the

(Bcc''ed to networking discuss). Hi All, Have enclosed man page draft for dlstat(1M) herewith. This is part of the effort to gain better visibility into network traffic in light of crossbow features like virtual NICs, interrupt vs. polling modes etc. This in turn would greatly assist network performance analysis. It is also aimed at segregating link/flow configuration from

I see in NexentaStor''s announcement of Community Edition 3.0.3 they mention some backported patches in this release. Aside from their management features / UI what is the core OS difference if we move to Nexenta from OpenSolaris b134? These DeDup bugs are my main frustration - if a staff member does a rm * in a directory with dedup you can take down the whole storage server - all with

On 2017-09-08 13:02, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 12:43:40 +0200 > Sven Schwedas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> On 2017-09-08 12:26, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 12:03:53 +0200 >>> "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>>

On 2017-09-08 12:26, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 12:03:53 +0200 > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Thanks Rowland, >> >> Very appriciated. >> The dnsmasq servers are explained, these are no problem in his setup >> sofar i could tell/see. >> > Yes, but do the dnsmasq servers

On 03/10/10 10:48 AM, Mahesh wrote: > Hi all, > > I need some help in debugging the gldv3 driver performance issue on sparc. The driver has single Tx queue and 4 Rx queues and performs at almost the line rate(10G) on Sun intel boxes but the same driver performs very badly on sparc. The code is identical for sparc and intel except swapping involved since the hardware is little endian .

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi folks, I've this infrastructure: |voip services| -- |*| -- |cme| -- |isdn| the voip services are logged on my *, then forwarded to number 601 on cme. The isdn calls too are forwarded to 601. On cme I've a timeout X for call-forward noan (no answer) to a specific number on * (5901) that is my x-lite software client. If 5901 is

Hello all, I am trying to configure a subdomain DNS server on a Cent OS 5.1 - for my lab. Brief configuration: Lab machine ---> 192.168.17.2 (should respond to DNS queries from hosts in 192.168.16.0/20 network) 1. I would also like to forward any queries outside the above network to our corporate domain (no firewalls between our 192.168.16.x network and the corporate network. The domain

Hello Shorewall list, I''m a happy Shorewall user since a few years now and everything works fine for me except one thing that I try to implement since a week, the multi-isp. I''ve downloaded the 2.4.0 Stable release yesterday and tried the RC2 since a week. My config is a Debian running a kernel 2.4.27 home made with the CONNMARK.diff patch applied I''m using 2 ISP,

On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 3:56 PM syzbot <syzbot+3f3e5e77d793c7a6fe6c at syzkaller.appspotmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > syzbot found the following crash on: > > HEAD commit: a32db7e1 Add linux-next specific files for 20191002 > git tree: linux-next > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=175ab7cd600000 > kernel config: