similar to: Multiple ISPs

I can't seem to get the Domain Admins group members to be recognisd as administrators on domain member PCs.Running net groupmap list yeilds the following: Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1288424760-4211430746-2168377316-512) -> admin --irrelevant groups omitted-- Running net rpc group members "Domain Admins" yeilds: RLRMR\administrator RLRMR\root Looging in as administrator on a

Hello, I am thinking of connecting a Shorewall Firewall to three different ISPs and load balancing some but not all connections. Just asking for some advice for now. Here''s the network layout: ISP1 ISP2 ISP3 ADSL Router 1 ADSL Router 2 ADSL Router 3 | | | FW:eth0 FW:eth1 FW:eth2

I' just setting up a samba server using centos and get you don't have permission to change you password on the windows xp client. Just wondered what others are using for the passwd chat line in smb.conf. Mine is: *New*password* %nn *Retype*new*password* %nn *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* Also tried setting passwd chat debug = Yes but that seems to have no

Hello guys, Sorry to bothering you. I had a small network with one ISP and firewall. eth1 -> Is connected to my ISP eth0 + eth0.1 , eth0.2 and etc are my local networks. All my network accesses internet via eth1. My routing table looks like the following : 213.194.242.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 10.123.20.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0

On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 01:01:47PM +0100, Raimund Sacherer wrote: > This is our setup which we are trying in a couple of our remote offices: [...] > FW-01 and FW-02 are Master/Slave firewalls (pfSense with Carp failover). We have currently 3 "remote offices" connected which have all basically the same setup, one office has more internet lines. > > Currently I have it

Hello List, This is our setup which we are trying in a couple of our remote offices: +---------------------------------------+ +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | | | | | +----------------+ |

I want to build a robust firewall for a resort installation. The resort''s telephony is entirely VOIP, asterisk based. We have the following internet feeds: 1) 512/512 kb fixed bandwidth leased line with static IP from Telco- primary connection, expensive, to use for VOIP, VPN traffic, mail server, SSH access for remote work. Reliable. 2) 256/512 kb ADSL from Telco, not fixed IP -

I have a server, server A, with three NICs: two to the Internet via separate ADSL modems, and one to the LAN. The two ''net'' interfaces are configured as described at http://www.shorewall.net/MultiISP.html. This has been working for a number of months. I am now testing an OpenVPN link between server A and another (currently single-ISP) server (server B). I can establish the VPN

Hello, Today I restarted the firewall machine during an outage of the ADSL line overhere. At the boot Shorewall did not start but stopped during start. The problem was that the ADSL line was down so no DNS server available to resolve hostnames. I have a hostname in "blacklist" file and therefore shorewall did not start. Is this problem solvable without putting an IP address in the

>> Besides, the way you suggest means opening a SMTP port to the outside > world. A security risk and more work at the firewall etc. > > You can just allow some ip addresses of your provider to connect, not? > Nothing outside world. Yes, you all want me to open ports. I'm sorry guys, but I won't budge: 1) Opening a port means reconfiguring the firewall. You may find

Hi all I need to use three 512 kbps aDSL internet connections, in a load-sharing, link-failover scenario. Presently I am using Ipcop with a single DSL. Now, I seem to have two options...one..an Edimax quad wan port adsl router, with firewalling and NAT and second install a minimal linux distro for routing...something on the lines of LARTC....and keep NATTING, IDS & Firewalling on the linux

Hi all, I''ve been trying to set up a shorewall box with 2 ISPs. After a shorewall start/restart, shorewall correctly configures and balances the default main route via both ISPs: [...] default nexthop via 200.173.215.94 dev eth0 weight 10 nexthop via 200.157.40.129 dev eth2 weight 20 but after a boot, that route is not configured. Inspecting the code, I solved

I'd like to transfer all my pesky telemarketing calls to Jolly Roger . http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/25/fashion/a-robot-that-has-fun-at-telemarketers-expense.html In the middle of a call I'd hit some DTMF sequence, which would dial Jolly Roger and transfer the call after Jolly Roger answers. But blindtransfer requires an extension after you hear "transfer". And I don't

I know they have software that does this. I'm just not sure which one it is. Basically here's the scoop. I'm on a cable modem connection with Comcast. I have a firewall router and I run a firewall on CentOS as well. All the same, other computers (probably zombies or hackers) are attempting brute force attacks on a couple of ports on my computer. I've just sat and watched them for

The Shorewall2/ project in CVS contains my initial attempt to establish correct routing for traffic forwarded from two different ISPs to internal servers. >From the release notes: Shorewall 2.3.2 includes support for multiple Internet interfaces to different ISPs. This feature is enabled by setting the "default" option for each Internet interface in

I'm wondering if anyone knows of ISPs with service that has QoS features that would be good to use with VoIP stuff. Granted, the QoS would only be supported as long as you stayed within their network, but it might be better than nothing. --Eric

original at: http://www.praga.org.ar/wacko/DevPraga/htbgen Htb-gen has evolved a lot since it release in feb/2006, but i have no time to make a public decent documented and generalized release. But right now i think that is better to put the stuff here, so others can enjoy the notorious improvements (and maybe someone whants to help out) Lets go to the hacks: I have made 2 flavors of htb-gen

Doing routing based on this: http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html Have done it for over a year. Tried a new 2.6.15 kernel. Firewall is based on debian sarge. Most things work ok dnat snat etc. Can simultaneous ssh in to an internal host via both isps with no problems. At the moment the default route is via eth2. root@fonroute:~# ip rule 0: from all lookup local 200:

All, I've posted a new tip on the Integrics website. It's on how ISPs can offer VoIP service to their customers, and why it makes good business sense to do so. http://integrics.com/tips/voip_for_isps/ Older tips can be found at: http://integrics.com/tips/ -- Alistair Cunningham, Integrics Ltd, Telephony, Database, Unix consulting worldwide +44 (0)7870 699 479 http://integrics.com/

Hi all, ive got 2 internet connections set up via the nano howto (which are working great) and we are running NAT. Was looking in to qos mainly to stop large http downloads/ftp downloads from hogging the line so that browsing for other users doesnt slow to a crawl, but if the line is free and no one is doing anything then for it to use the available bandwith. The wondershaper sounded exactly what