similar to: xapian error

Xapian (0.7.5) is spitting out this error on a regular basis: org.xapian.errors.DatabaseError: Error reading block 136618: got end of=20= file =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 at=20 org.xapian.XapianJNI.writabledatabase_repalce_document(Native Method) =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 at=20 org.xapian.WritableDatabase.replaceDocument(WritableDatabase.java:67) I don't have a gdb backtrace, only the Java

I posted this message first. But it was missing so I post again. I think there is a some bug in build configration files. Can you check up the following errors and fix it? The error has no concern with UTF-8 patch. Environment : CentOS 4.3 x86_64 Sungsoo Kim ---------------------------------- [root at saturn xapian-core-0.9.4_svn6707]# make ... ... mkdir .libs/libxapian.lax/libqueryparser.a

On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 03:55:59PM +0000, richard wrote: > * backends/quartz/btree.cc,backends/flint/flint_io.h: Patches from > Charlie Hull to allow 2GB+ index files work when compiled using > Visual C++. I suspect that xapian-compact.cc (and quartzcompact.cc if you can be bothered) will also need fixing since they use off_t. You need to make sure that the stat() function called

Greetings, I've been wondering about the index format and backwards compatibility. We're using the dev version (for chert) and each svn up means that any indexes created prior to this revision cannot be read. Is this purely a cautious move to prevent errors, and, barring any obvious index format changes, can I safely force the current revision to read existing indexes? eg, by

Hello, Would anyone object to my submitting an entry for xapian-core to the FreeBSD ports collection ? This would make it even easier for any FreeBSD user to install a xapian-based application. By the way, it does not seem quite right that xapian-core 0.9 will install commands with such generic names as 'copydatabase' or 'simplesearch' to /usr/local/bin by default. Either a

I am getting this error when trying to remove a document from my Xapian database via writabledatabase_delete_document: "DatabaseCorruptError: Db block overwritten - are there multiple writers?" There might have been two processes trying to write to it earlier today, but currently only one process can touch it at a time, and I still receive the error. Is there a fast way to fix this

Hello, First I wanted to say thanks for a great piece of software, thanks Olly and others who've contributed! I know that Xapian supports right-truncating, if that's the proper name for wildcard support, as in a search for "xapia*". I don't believe Xapian supports wildcards on both sides of a term, correct? Is this something that is technically unfeasable, unpalatable

There is is bug when setting XAPIAN_FLUSH_THRESHOLD=20000000 When trying for force Xapian flush documents to flush after 20 million documents Xapian ignores the size and flush it after only 10,000 documents. Data captured from delve after 60 seconds interval when has been set as follow: XAPIAN_FLUSH_THRESHOLD=20000000 perl -e ' while(1) { system("delve ."); sleep(60); } '

Flint failed to deliver indexing performance to Quartz. I am proposing to remove Flint as default database and place Quartz database back as default. The catch is not that Flint database is smaller and faster during searches then Quartz database as developers were concerning when were measuring and neglecting to measure performance when creating the large indexes. The truth is that Flint

We've had some catastrophic filesystem failures that have left us with corrupted databases with empty files and no backup for about 15TB of our data. Recreating the 15TB from source data backups is possible but will take a very very long time. I'm hoping that, given all of the .DB files are still intact, there my be some way to extract their contents and rebuild the other tables. This

A Recoll user gets the following message while indexing: "Attempted to delete or modify an entry in a non-existent posting list for #bannerholder" The exception happens during a commit call. Xapian version 1.4.11, Debian Buster A little more detail here: https://opensourceprojects.eu/p/recoll1/tickets/108/ I asked if this was reproducible, and to run the indexing in single-thread

Hi, I do have few questions regarding xapine as I'm a newbie in this and would appreciate if someone could give me some insight: 1: When I'm trying to index , why it creates/opens so many files, e.g.this is how one of my index looks like: % ~/xapian_index> ls db_lock position_baseA record_DB termlist_baseA meta postlist_DB record_baseA value_DB

hi, I'm using Xapian on Windows with large files. My index directory is about 65 607 466 693 bytes: 2007-01-30 09:28 17 position_baseA 2007-01-30 10:06 17 position_baseB 2007-01-23 14:18 0 position_DB 2007-01-30 10:06 360 496 postlist_baseB 2007-01-30 10:06 23 623 852 032 postlist_DB 2007-01-30 10:06 88 432

I've some trouble with my indexer, which builds on simpleindex.cc. The problem is that indexing process becomes very slow after we indexed 2000k docs (though the indexer works quite well with first 2000k docs). It took almost three weeks to index 8 million docs. However, we need to index about 20 million docs. I have to stop the indexer due to its performance. I think my question is

I'm trying to compact (or at least merge) multiple databases, while stripping search records which are no longer required. Backstory: I've inherited the Cyrus IMAPd xapian-based search code from Greg Banks when he left Opera. One of the unfinished parts was removing expunged emails from the search database. We moved from having a single search database to supporting multiple

Mike Hommey <mh at glandium.org> writes: > Hi, > > When running `notmuch compact` today, it stopped with the following > output: > > Compacting database... > compacting table postlist > Reduced by 25% 648656K (2498904K -> 1850248K) > compacting table docdata > Reduced by 15% 24K (152K -> 128K) > compacting table termlist > Reduced by

I am fairly confident that these issues are related to killing the scriptindex process ungracefully causing blocks that were queued for writing to disk to not get written. I mention to send you the file because it could be that you would see almost immediately with the situation is. Thanks > ----- Original Message ----- > From: oscaruser@programmer.net > To:

Thanks Olly, I have given flint a go -and it is generally much quicker (once it has loaded the cache -that process still takes minutes). Flint actually seems tro do some caching whereas quartz just seemed to hit the disc constantly. Generally I've been running it on a machine with 5G of memory -but it has to contend with other processes for resources, I have also run it on its own on a 1G

We have: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- typedef unsigned long uint4; ---------------------------------------------------------------------- which on an LP64 system is a lie. If uint4 is used on disk (and it's used in the btree implementation) then it would make the databases unportable, which probably isn't a good idea (unless we already have

Morning All, I use scriptindex to build my database and the PHP bindings to pull it all out. Is it possible to have more than one index but select what the bindings search on? So at the moment I index property addresses, I would also like to index property descriptions for more advanced searching but only as an optional extra...probably in an extra search box. Also I would like to analyse the