similar to: Does xapian support image search?

I have an installation which is currenly using 14 DID Trunk Lines. I need to be able to use Caller ID information and currently it is not available on these lines. Is there another way to access this information? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040105/62559e22/attachment.htm

Folks, I found free-nx in the repositories and tried to install/use it I could not figure out how to get it working. I tried following directions on the wiki But I still could not get it working Feel free to contact me at stephen.bovy at teradata.com I am currenly using the official ns server on sles 11 sp3 Is their any direction on how to install free nx on sles ??

I have a number of inbound analog lines connecting through Digium cards to an Asterisk box. Asterisk then bridges the calls over to the internal extensions which are all SIP phones. Currenly the inbound lines do not have callerid on them so callerid=no in my zapata.conf file. What happens on inbound calls is that the SIP extensions are dialed but their callerid shows

hello list, i need to setup an asterisk system with 5 ISDN trunks. i found C4 cards but they are very expensive. i found that if i use 5 AVM Fritz! cards it would be very cheap. i want to use 2 boxes. 3 in boxA +2 in boxB =5 isdn. and i want, this two boxs to work as a single box so that one box can share ISDN hardware from other box. this system will be serving a call center. currenly we are

Hello, Currenly I've ASterik@Home 1.5 running on DMZ. I can register SJphone there, good audio on 8200 (webmeet me calls) and i also can dial Zapata extensions. When I dial sip phone extensions nothing happens if the client that i'm calling is registred, if the client has voicemail it goes to voicemail. IMPORTANT: I get this error message on my Check Point Firewall: "sip

Help needed Currenly i'm running samba on a RedHat 7.3 system. The primary domain contreller in the network in a windows 2000 server machine. I'm using the windows 2000 server to authenticate my users in the domain. Each time a new user is created in windows 2000, i have to create the same user in linux inorder to allow the user to have access to the samba shares. Is the re a script or

Hi, I'm currenly working with clang, so I don't have any llvm-gcc installed (I used to have the 4.2 release version, but that broke a lot of tests). A number of tests (test/CFrontend and test/C++Frontend for example) won't run if you don't have llvm-gcc installed, which is good. However, the test/LLVMC tests do run, but fail. These tests test the llvmc2 compiler driver, but they

Hello, We are running Asterisk-1.0.12 in a CentOS 4-4.2 system, kernel 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp. We have some custom AGI, and when we launch Asterisk the system works fine. But **after some time**, each AGI execution generates a zombie <defunct> process. We believe that it's not a problem in the AGI code, because Asterisk+AGI is working fine in the first "n" minutes/hours. This

Hey Charles, Latest update. Looks like in ups.conf I setup default.input.transfer.low = 84. After I took that line out, restart upsdrvctl, upsmon, and upsd, the command of sudo upsrw -s input.transfer.low=70 -u * -p * ups return OK. Still need to verify if it works by using voltage regulator and will keep you updated. Thank you for your help Regards Shen On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 8:54 AM,

"float (i32)* (float (i32)*)*" is not a return type. According to the description of the 'call' instruction in LLVM Assembly Language Reference Manual (http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#i_call) this is a signature of the pointer to function value being invoked (which includes the return type). In your case the full signature is printed because get_ptr returns a pointer to

Thank you for answering my confusion. I have another questions. If I add really instructions instead intrinsics ,can I reach my purpose? I guess ,the answer is "can't". I don't find the anything about how machine to do about instructions,especially "ALU" instructions. Thank you again, Tianhao Shen On 11/14/2018 13:42，Craig Topper<craig.topper at gmail.com>

Hello Charles, Thank you for your comment. Just tried to use ups.delay.shutdown to postpone the UPS shutdown. The thing is that if the PC shutdown first, then the UPS, it wasn't able to send "shutdown.reboot" any more because everything is power off after the UPS shuts down. Also play on the watchdog for Tripp Lite. Looks like it has the command of reset.watchdog but not

I'm sorry that I should remove the comment. In fact my question is about the "float (i32)* (float (i32)*)*", why we use this kind of return type instead of just "float (i32)*". Thanks a lot. Hao On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Hao Shen, > >> %4 = call float (i32)* (float (i32)*)* @get_ptr(float (i32)* @a1)

Hi Lang, Thanks for your reply! It seems that the code of ORC has been changed a lot these months. Actually what I wanted to see then was quite simple, Let's say we have two modules M1.bc and M2.bc, and in M1 we want to call function foo(defined in M2.bc)with the function type int foo(float, char*){...} what basic steps do I need to do to make M1.bc call foo remotely? BTW, does the

Hey Charles, Looks like after take out default.input.transfer.low, upsrw script *DOES* work, the only thing for Eaton 3S 500 is that it is only accept certain voltage values for input.transfer.low, 84v and 96v are two of them. Otherwise the value never gets picked up. Thank you for all your help Shen On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Shen Chuan <shen at minutekey.com> wrote: > Hey

John, thanks for your helpful advice. My ultimate goal is to construct a full instruction-level program dependence graph for a given IR file. The hard point is how to establish the correct data dependence edges when some function arguments are multi-level pointers. To solve this problem I hope to check the point-to level for each pointer variable. I think the data dependence through pointers can

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:19 PM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > SHEN Hao wrote: >> Thanks a lot for your answer. >> As what you said, I can not have any options to avoid generating this kind >> of intrinsic for byte code. Is it possible to modify gcc and ask it take >> all memset liked functions as a general function call? I know this solution

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Hao Shen, > >> Is there anyone who knows well i80 data type? Is there any >> corresponding data type >> for X86 processor? uint80_t or int80_t for gcc? > > no, there is no native processor support for i80. GCC does not have > a direct equivalent to i80. However if you declare a

http://biomet.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/86/3/677 biometrika1999 http://biomet.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/94/4/1006 biometrika2000 Hi All: I just want to try some luck. I am currenly working on my project,one part of my project is to reanalysis the kenward cattle data by using the method in Mohsen's paper,but I found I really can get the same or close output as he did,so,any

I implemented a proof of concept of a new generic MachineFunction SSA pass. The code is not readable and not efficient yet, but it shows interesting results: In fma.ll @test_FMSUB2 (return dummy(A * B + C, A * B - D)): before: fmr 0, 1 xsmaddadp 3, 0, 2 xsmsubmdp 0, 2, 4 fmr 1, 3 fmr 2, 0 bl dummy2 after: xsmsubadp 4, 1, 2 xsmaddmdp