similar to: Subversion?

On Mar 20, 2004, at 1:07 PM, Ralph Giles wrote: > Ok, I'm starting the conversion. Please hold all commits until > further notice good luck! let me know how the cvs2svn script works out for you... I'm looking at doing the same soon with a ~800 file cvs repository I'm in charge of. /dale --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage:

All, We are considering removing some branches and tags in the conversion process from CVS to SVN. We don't want to do this in a vaccuum, so please read carefully. A deficiency in the cvs2svn script causes it to bloat the Subversion repository (significantly, as in 10x) in the conversion of branches and tags. We can minimize the impact of this by only keeping branches and tags that we really

I'm getting remotetest and apitest failing for me on ixion on SVN HEAD-ish. I can't find a link to tinderbox anywhere obvious (I expected it to be linked from bleeding edge, and possibly the bugzilla start page), so I don't know if it's something dumb I've done to my setup and checkout, or a genuine problem. Any ideas? J --

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1818 Summary: SSH2_MSG_CHANNEL_FAILURE on closed channel Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.1p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

Hi Reid, > A deficiency in the cvs2svn script causes it to bloat the Subversion > repository (significantly, as in 10x) in the conversion of branches > and tags. It's probably a bit late in the day, but have you considered other CVS to SVN conversion tools, e.g. Tailor? http://www.darcs.net/DarcsWiki/Tailor http://darcs.arstecnica.it/tailor/ Cheers, Ralph.

(Copied to Dave Hart at the NTP project, who's interested in the code's progress for non-NUTty reasons. Dave, the background is that I'm doing a trial conversion of the Network UPS Tools repo.) First, repostreamer per se is dead. As it evolved it kept pulling in more bits of code from reposurgeon until I said "screw it!" and merged the repostreamer logic in as a reposurgeon

Hi: I've successfully installed Xapian under Ubuntu Linux using APT but when I tried it on an older Debian machine I got a broken package error: ------------------------------------------ # apt-get install libxapian8 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are

With the new "stamp" rules for running SWIG, things don't seem to get rebuilt when I expect them to, e.g.: olly at ixion:~/svn/xapian/xapian-bindings/python $ make modern/xapian_wrap.cc make: Nothing to be done for `modern/xapian_wrap.cc'. olly at ixion:~/svn/xapian/xapian-bindings/python $ ls -l modern/xapian_wrap.cc ls: modern/xapian_wrap.cc: No such file or directory Problem

The FreeBSD Project has begun the switch of its source code management system from CVS to Subversion. At this point in time, FreeBSD's developers are making changes to the base system in the Subversion repository. There is a replication system in place that exports our work to the legacy CVS tree on a continuous basis. People who are using our extensive CVS based distribution network

SSH server specs: ----------------------- Redhat Linux 6.2 Custom built 2.2.17 kernel OpenSSL 0.9.5a (update from RedHat). OpenSSH 2.5.1p1 I am using my Linux box as an Internet gateway. I wanted to keep the box as secure as possible while still having the functionality I needed. The only way to connect to my server is through SSH. A fair majority of the time I am attempting to

This is taking longer than I expected, because there is all kinds of cvs2svn-generated ugliness in your back history that tends to crash my tools. Your repo makes a great test case. (Yes, I know, that's like having someone say "Your dog is fantastically ugly!") Current state of things is that I have scrapped my precious approach, which was to put the Subversion tools in a Python

Everyone, We are at long last migrating the xiph.org source repository from to subversion. We've been wanting to do this for some years, but have been waiting for a conversion script that could deal with our creaky old cvs repository. Subversion, although perfectly usable for the past two years, recently announced a stable 1.0 release, and more importantly the major issues with the

Everyone, We are at long last migrating the xiph.org source repository from to subversion. We've been wanting to do this for some years, but have been waiting for a conversion script that could deal with our creaky old cvs repository. Subversion, although perfectly usable for the past two years, recently announced a stable 1.0 release, and more importantly the major issues with the

Everyone, We are at long last migrating the xiph.org source repository from to subversion. We've been wanting to do this for some years, but have been waiting for a conversion script that could deal with our creaky old cvs repository. Subversion, although perfectly usable for the past two years, recently announced a stable 1.0 release, and more importantly the major issues with the

Everyone, We are at long last migrating the xiph.org source repository from to subversion. We've been wanting to do this for some years, but have been waiting for a conversion script that could deal with our creaky old cvs repository. Subversion, although perfectly usable for the past two years, recently announced a stable 1.0 release, and more importantly the major issues with the

Dear developers, thanks to Charles (Lepple) and ESR hard work, we are now able to finalize our migration from Subversion to Git, on Alioth. As of now, our Subversion repository on Alioth<https://alioth.debian.org/scm/?group_id=30602>is FROZEN! Any new svn commit may simply be discarded, so beware! Most active developers are currently using github, as a temporary mean. But if you have any

Reed, Can the "see" branch be renamed "SVA", for Secure Virtual Architecture? This is the new name of the LLVA system and project. It uses LLVM as the instruction set and compiler infrastructure. Thanks, --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ On Apr 2, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Reid Spencer wrote: > All, > > We are considering removing some

On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 13:30 -0500, Vikram S. Adve wrote: > Reed, > > Can the "see" branch be renamed "SVA", for Secure Virtual > Architecture? This is the new name of the LLVA system and project. > It uses LLVM as the instruction set and compiler infrastructure. Yes, we can do that. I'll add it to the conversion script. > > Thanks, > >

bugzilla-daemon@ixion.tartarus.org wrote: > http://www.xapian.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117 > > ------- Additional Comments From olly@survex.com 2007-04-05 13:52 ------- > I've actually already implemented a fix. If bugzilla stops sending me mail, I > might even manage to check it in soon! Sorry Olly - just about finished sorting things out now! For everyone

I'm currently working out how best to use cvs2svn to convert the CVS repo. I'm wondering if we want to strip out some of the tags - in particular the old snapshot_* tags. These mark points when the code was know to bootstrap and pass "make distcheck" on x86 linux, but the newest is 2001/04/24 - back in the BrightStation days! In the unlikely event that anyone really cares,