similar to: List posting etiquette

Hi, I'm using an Adit 600 Channel Bank with *. I love it and it works really great for my FXS lines. One problem that I have with it (It's really not a problem yet, but it's a potential one) is that I've scoured the manaual for the Adit to see if there's a way to dump out a config file from the bank so in the event of a power and battery failure I don't have to type in the

Is there a way in Ferret to do something akin to SQL''s "SELECT DISTINCT" query? I have a table with multiple columns, and I would like to search just a couple of them (but index others for other kinds of searches on the table). The two columns I want to search do not have unique values, because the other columns finish specifying the record. Is there a way to avoid picking up

Been using a few different FXO interfaces (X100P, Voicetronix, and SPA-3000) at a couple sites and they've all run into nasty issues at times. I'm looking at moving one of my offices and am in the market for a solution for connecting 4 FXOs. I got excited about recent offerings from Digium and Sangoma in the way of new cards but I hear they're causing troubles for more than a few.

Well I am glad that there has been alot of input on this topic, alot of people are having different opinions but that is because we are not focusing with the problem at hand. The documentation provides full details on how to get samba + ldap working from scratch; but there seems to be a gap between chapter 5 & 6; Once again I will say I love this book; by far the best technical reference

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-176.html refers: This update has been rated as having critical security impact by the CentOS Security Response Team. The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: firefox-1.0.1-1.4.3.centos4.1.i386.rpm You may update you CentOS-4 i386 installations by running the command: yum upgrade Thanks Johnny Hughes

We are looking to lose the TDM400P in favor of an ISDN-BRI solution. This should get rid of static on the line (at least any static generated by our half of the circuit), right? I am a total virgin to ISDN. I understand that we need two BRI circuits to provide four voice channels, and that the hardware to speak to the BRI circuits can be passive or active, with the active type being much more

have a strange isue. [ this is my 2nd day with centos4] nice instalatin BTW ok, i activated cupsd sharing and open the port 631 in the security level when i lpq from withing a network interface i get thi error ~$ lpq lpq: error - no default destination available. and in centos the log shows D [19/Mar/2006:08:37:17 -0500] AcceptClient: 8 from 192.168.1.100:631. D [19/Mar/2006:08:37:17 -0500]

Has anyone else noticed that firefox is less stable after the recent security update? I'm getting several occurrences per day of "just goes poof," i.e. probably seg fault. -- Collins When I saw the Iraqi people voting three weeks ago, 8 million of them, it was the start of a new Arab world.... The Berlin Wall has fallen. - Lebanese Druze leader Walid

Just came up with some interesting (read: frustrating) problems on RHEL3 and RHEL4 today at work, and I've confirmed one of the problems on my up-to-date CentOS4 system at home. I was forced into releasing some RHEL3 systems to replace our aging RH9 systems without time for adequate testing, and that leads to problems like these. On our legacy RH9 systems, mounting a USB key is no problem,

Has anyone else encountered a loop and failure to shutdown on CentOS4? This has occurred twice in the past month, but unfortunately I failed to write down the looping messages. The only relevant problems I found via Google reference raid controllers, and I have POI (plain ol' IDE). Doh! Obviously I wuill need to record the errors. My environment is run-level 5 with GDM, but I use IceWm

I'm a home user of CentOS (a desktop and a laptop) because I like the quality of the product and I love the cost. I'm a great believer in FOSS. That being said, I know that some of you use CentOS for production servers and (perhaps?) desktops as well. I've read at leat one comment like "I have 20 CentOS servers." My employer is a firm believer in RHEL - license costs are

As a parallel question to my thread about CentOS for commercial use, here's a question I've been wondering about. How many of you who have RHEL licenses and paid support licenses have ever needed actually to request support? And if you did was the support any bit more timely or accurate than community support for CentOS or other distros? -- Collins When I saw the Iraqi people

Hi, I have to connect 30 phone lines to my asterisk server, can somebody help on how I have to do it ? I have a TDM405P and one TDM400P with 4 FXO ports. Do I have to use 8 TDM400P ? Or, is there another way to do it ? Thanks, Angel.

This thread (... Tomcat ...) emphasizes the essential conundrom of CentOS whose mission is to provide a community-based, well-maintained and freely distributable version of the stable enterprise software from the Well Known North American VENDOR (WKNAV). There is a essential gap betweenthe community (I want lots of current packages) and the WKNAV base (you get what I choose to provide). As CentOS

Just to set the record straight. -- Collins Richey If you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for.

while in firefox if i use arrow keys in text fields, it acts very oddly. starting at the beginning of the line it works fine for a few characters and then jumps to the end of the line. backarrow jumps backwards from the end of line to within a few chars of the beginning. anyone else seeing this?

Hi All, I''ve installed puppet and puppetmaster on 2 separate Virtual Machines. I''ve started the puppetmasterd in Verbose debugging mode and im guetting this error on the master when I try and connect to it with the puppet client... err: Could not find puppetc.myhost.com with names puppetc.myhost.com, puppetc It seams that I''ve setup the certificate right

[ context from the previous thread ] On Saturday 28 May 2005 14:41, Collins Richey wrote: > On 5/28/05, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > > Sure. LVM. > I'm curious about this. At work we haven't finished our evaluation of > RHEL3/RHEL4 (CentOS is out of the question, since SLA is king here). > Most of our servers and desktops are RH9 legacy, and we use LVM

CentOS is a really great product, and the package supporters do a bang up job, but the one deficiency I've found is the fact that one can never rely on being able to get updates at any particular time. Whether it's CentOS proper or the Dag additions, something is broke most every time I want to apply updates. I know this is whin[ge]ing, and I certainly don't have a solution to offer.

On 6/16/2016 2:48 PM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev wrote: > >> On Jun 16, 2016, at 9:01 AM, TB Schardl via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> The CSI framework inserts instrumentation hooks at salient locations >> throughout the compiled code of a program-under-test, such as >> function entry