similar to: mdbox and doveadm purge

Hi, First, Timo, Thank you for Dovecot 2.1.0. I've built Dovecot 2.1.0 RPMs including Dovecot-Pigeonhole 0.3.0 for RHEL6, CentOS 6 and Scientific Linux 6. If anyone is interested in testing these RPMs: http://oss.imt-systems.com/mstevens/el6/dovecot/2.1.0/ Feedback would be appreciated. After some testing, we will use these RPMs on our IMAP servers. Best regards, Morten

Hi, It is probably a problem with pigeonhole 0.2.5. ... make[3]: *** [managesieve-proxy.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... Here is my build log: http://oss.imt-systems.com/mstevens/temp/build.log Someone an idea? Best regards, Morten

Hi all, are there any pitfalls known for the migration from 2.0.18 to 2.1? Can I simply stop dovecot, make install and start again? --Frank Elsner

what anti-spam for you used ? dspam?spammassian? amavisd-new ? what is best ?

Hi, I have > 11 TB hard used Mailstorage, saved als maildir in ext3 on HP EVA. I always wanted to make some mesurements about several influences to the performance (switch to ext4, switch to mdbox), but I never had enough time to do that. At the moment I *need* more speed, we have too much waitI/O on the system and I already used all other performance and tuning-tricks (separated cache,

Hi there. I am using mdbox storage with great success but I am seeing something I find strange and I would like to compare notes with you. When doing "doveadm purge", "m.*" files with non deleted messages are left alone, but "m.*" files with deleted messages copy the "non deleted" messages to a newly created "m.*" file and delete the original.

Where on the CentOS website does one find the CentOS-6 CR repo install package? I can find the one for CentOS-5 but not for 6. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1

Here is a small btrfs vs. ext4 benchmark with kernel 2.6.37-rc1. compilebench with options -i 10 -r 30 on 2.6.37-rc1 btrfs ========================================================================== intial create total runs 10 avg 73.11 MB/s (user 0.34s sys 1.96s) create total runs 5 avg 49.53 MB/s (user 0.41s sys 1.62s) patch total runs 4 avg 22.13 MB/s (user 0.09s sys 1.79s) compile total runs

Hi, I'm testing Dovecot 2.0rc2 with mdbox mail format and I'm not sure what this exactly means: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox Quote from wiki page: ===== Expunging a message only decreases the message's refcount. The space is later freed in "purge" step. This may be done automatically within the session or later in a nightly cronjob when there's less

Hi, I use Dovecot-2.0.13 with mdbox and Thunderbird (IMAP). I have dozens of imap folders and sometimes I wish to delete several folders: First Problem: If I remove a folder under TB, it get moved to my Trash folder. After that I close TB, which also purges the trash. When I come back, the deleted folder and its content is still there. There is no way to remove it with TB. On the server side I

Hi, we get errors about corrupted indexes and we are losing flags with mdbox on NFSv4: Error: Recent flags state corrupted for mailbox Error: Corrupted dbox file Error: Corrupted transaction log file It looks like a LMTP director problem. The user has IMAP IDLE connections open and lmtp delivers to another host. This leads to nfs corruption problems. The user is logged into mail04 and has some

Hi, I have a "ubuntu10.04 + ext4-filesystem + dovecot-2.0.13 +mdbox" configuration in my server. It works fine with ~50k accounts. Recently happened a filesystem corruption in a device of StMailLocation and I fix with fsck.ext4. After this crash, one account began to show access timeout and errors like this on force-resync: # doveadm force-resync -u account INBOX doveadm(account):

All, Is there a bug in doveadm purge ? Configured alt storage and move messages in inbox to the alternate path all well and good. However, after deleting some messages and running a purge on the mailbox found that all messages got recopied over to primary location. I guess this maybe because its re-writing the file and ditching the purged mail .. but shouldnt it keep a track that they were

We''ve been running into problems with ferret indexing lately. The problem is intermittent and some times it persists. Just got this after wiping the index and redeploying: NoMethodError (undefined method `add'' for Solution:Class): (druby://10.1.65.87:9009) /data/releases/20071111152414/vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/base.rb:1238:in `method_missing''

Full_Name: M Welinder Version: 1.4 OS: (src) Submission from: (NULL) (192.5.35.38) It seems to me that pexp can be improved in the lower_tail=TRUE and log_p=FALSE case by using expm1. Something like -expm1 (-x / scale); I think. -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send

Full_Name: Morten Welinder Version: snapshot OS: Submission from: (NULL) (65.213.85.129) Two things are wrong. 1. There is nan test outside IEEE_754. 2. The meat part of the function should really be something like... if (!lower_tail) x = -x; if (fabs (x) > 1) { double temp = atan (1 / x) / M_PI; return (x > 0) ? R_D_Clog (temp) : R_D_val (-temp); } else

Hi. I''m upgrading a project from an 0.8.0 pre-release gem to 0.8.2. I''ve installed the 0.8.2 gem, and the rspec_on_rails 0.8.2 plugin: ruby script/plugin install svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/rspec/tags/REL_0_8_2/rspec When I try to run my specs though, I get the below error. It''s as if the spec_helper cannot find "spec/rails". I''ve noticed that

Full_Name: Morten Welinder Version: 2 OS: Solaris/space/gcc2.95.2 Submission from: (NULL) (65.213.85.217) I changed src/nmath/standalone/test.c to read: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #define MATHLIB_STANDALONE 1 #include <Rmath.h> #include <stdio.h> int main() { double x; for (x = 99990; x <= 100009; x++) printf

Full_Name: Morten Welinder Version: 2.1.0 OS: src only Submission from: (NULL) (216.223.241.212) Now that pcauchy has been fixed, it is becoming clear that qcauchy suffers from the same problems. qcauchy(pcauchy(1e100,0,1,FALSE,TRUE),0,1,FALSE,TRUE) should yield 1e100 back, but I get 1.633178e+16. The code below does much better. Notes: 1. p need not be finite. -Inf is ok in the log_p

I feel a bit embarassed by this, but I have not managed to find out how: I have a data frame containing measurements over time for a number of different locations: > str(milk) `data.frame': 845 obs. of 3 variables: $ date : num 1987 1987 1987 1987 1987 ... $ value : num 5 1 2 5 1 1 2 3 2 4 ... $ location: Factor w/ 36 levels "Alta","And?y",..: 1 1 1 1 1 1