similar to: problem with ldap, sendmail, dovecot

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: > Hello all, > > I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for up-to-date > information on this matter, and have found information that is anywhere from > 15 to 5 years old. I'd really like some information that much more up to date > on the subject. Specifically configuring Sendmail SMTP authentication (_no >

I wish to add options to sendmail INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`spamassassin', `S=local:/var/run/spamass-milter/spamass-milter.sock, F=T, T=C:5m;S:4m;R:4m;E:5m')dnl dnl MAILER(cyrusv2)dnl INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`greylist', `S=local:/var/run/milter-greylist/milter-greylist.sock') define(`confMILTER_MACROS_CONNECT', `j, {if_addr}') define(`confMILTER_MACROS_HELO', `{verify},

--On Saturday, September 21, 2019 9:59 PM +1200 Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: >> I use spamassassin via amavisd-new, with messages going postfix -> >> amavisd -> second postfix (all via SMTP). > > This is a good setup, but you may find that you can eliminate the second > postfix step there and go postfix -> amavisd-new -> dovecot lmtp. Unless

hi, i have installed sendmail+mailscanner+clamav+spamassassin and work fine, but my telnet localhost 25 is not authenticates. i read a lot of docs but something i don't do it. i have installed centos 4.3 with: sendmail-8.13.1-3 sendmail-cf-8.13.1-3 dovecot-0.99.11-2 mailscanner-4.50.15-3.9 clamav-0.88.4-1.9 spamassassin-3.0.6-1 cyrus-sasl-2.1.19-5 cyrus-sasl-plain-2.1.19-5

I am running a server with Centos 4.4, using a combo of sendmail-clamav-spamassassin for mail, which has been working quite well up until last night. Around 3:00am, all mail going to all users was being rejected by spamassassin. My ~/mail/.procmailrc is as follows: ======================== MAILDIR=$HOME/mail # :0 H * ^X-Spam-Status:.*Yes { EXITCODE=67 :0: /dev/null } =========================

I currently have a server with centos 4.3 setup to do email. I use sendmail as the receiving agent and Dovecot as the pop/imap server. Users authenticate off of a openldap server. Under a light load things appear to work fine. However under a moderately heavy load connections are left open in a waiting state. This causes some email to bounce with user unknown, users authentications fails with

On Sat, 21 Sep 2019, Kenneth Porter wrote: > I've been doing sendmail -> MIMEDefang -> SpamAssassin/clamd and > then sendmail -> procmail -> SpamAssassin. Yeah, SA gets run twice, > once to reject scores > 10 by the milter and then again by each user > to incorporate their Bayes scores. I'd love to run it only once but > haven't invested time in

On 21/09/19 9:07 AM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> said: >> Perfect. I think the only other significant customizations I have >> are lines to use the MIMEDefang and OpenDKIM milters. When last I >> looked into migrating, I recall that Postfix handled milters just >> fine. > > Milters work a little different

On Fri, March 31, 2017 4:46 pm, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 03/31/2017 02:40 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote: >> On 3/31/2017 2:15 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>> Well, it sounds like you are one of the companies with whose effort I >>> have >>> to fight constantly in my own effort to protect our users from spam... >> >> What makes Postfix superior in fighting

Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> said: > Perfect. I think the only other significant customizations I have > are lines to use the MIMEDefang and OpenDKIM milters. When last I > looked into migrating, I recall that Postfix handled milters just > fine. Milters work a little different under postfix IIRC... I haven't tried them (which is a little sad,

Hi Folks, I have a couple of questions which I hope that you will be able to assist with, first some background. I run a few sendmail servers that run MailScanner/Spamassassin/sendmail (current versions) on Centos 5.4 and Centos 4.8 These boxes accept mail for a large number of domains (6000+) scan the mail removing spam and then forward the ham to another server for delivery. I am attempting to

On 03/31/2017 02:40 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote: > On 3/31/2017 2:15 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> Well, it sounds like you are one of the companies with whose effort I >> have >> to fight constantly in my own effort to protect our users from spam... > > What makes Postfix superior in fighting spam? > > How do I integrate MIMEDefang, SpamAssassin, and ClamAV with

I have a problem getting spamd and sendmail (both stock CentOS4 rpms) to work together on a couple of smtp relay machines. This is clearly a configuration issue and no doubt revolves around my lack of comprehension of how this is to work. Basically, the setup consists of two frontend public smtp transports that redirect all email through a firewall to an internal imap server for final

I just noticed this error in my messages log after restarting sendmail. The only change I have made is 1) manual fix in /usr/share/spamassassin/72_active.conf 2) sa-update (several times) Now the mail is not running ok, my mail queue keeps growing. Regards, Jussi Hirvi

More patch-o-rama :-( ---Mike >From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@dione.ids.pl> >To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com, <vulnwatch@securityfocus.com>, > <full-disclosure@netsys.com> >X-Nmymbofr: Nir Orb Buk >Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Sendmail 8.12.9 prescan bug (a new one) >[CAN-2003-0694] >Sender: full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com >X-BeenThere:

On 3/31/2017 2:15 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Well, it sounds like you are one of the companies with whose effort I have > to fight constantly in my own effort to protect our users from spam... What makes Postfix superior in fighting spam? How do I integrate MIMEDefang, SpamAssassin, and ClamAV with Postfix? Are there migration guides for moving one's Sendmail anti-spam and AV

Hi, we have a strange problem: two of our users informed me, that they aren't able to send word-.doc-files anymore while othe attachements work fine. The e-mail gets deliverd, but the attachement is dropped. This happens using the latest thunderbird 1.5.x and mac os x. The e-mail is also not saved in the send-drawer. If the users send the same e-mail to the same recepient using an other

--On Friday, September 20, 2019 2:06 PM -0500 Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net> wrote: >> How would you implement the section here titled "Sendmail >> workaround" using Postfix? > > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#recipient_delimiter Perfect. I think the only other significant customizations I have are lines to use the MIMEDefang and OpenDKIM milters.

I have a 6.5 machine that had everything set up and working correctly (fetchmail, sendmail w/ starttls, procmail, spamassassin) but the MB cratered. I bought a new machine, and installed Centos 6.6 and all is not well. I used the config from the previous incarnation (via backups) for fetchmail (works fine), sendmail (works fine for sending via relay and tls), but procmail now refuses to pick up

Hi All, I upgraded from 5.3 to 5.4 today on a vpn gateway using openswan. After the upgrade the vpn stopped working. From what I could tell the new version of openswan uses NSS. I tried following the instructions in this thead https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508107 without success. # certutil -N -d sql:/etc/ipsec.d certutil: function failed: security library: bad database.