similar to: segfault in dovecot 2.0.9

For tests purpose, I have connected a D1000 on a small V120 pizza box with Solaris 10 with recent patches. To simulate disk crash, I removed a disc from the D1000, but after that, using zpool status makes the system hang. Only power cycle helps. I found the following link: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=87048&#87048 that explains that a bug ID (6456939) has been

Hi, First, Timo, Thank you for Dovecot 2.1.0. I've built Dovecot 2.1.0 RPMs including Dovecot-Pigeonhole 0.3.0 for RHEL6, CentOS 6 and Scientific Linux 6. If anyone is interested in testing these RPMs: http://oss.imt-systems.com/mstevens/el6/dovecot/2.1.0/ Feedback would be appreciated. After some testing, we will use these RPMs on our IMAP servers. Best regards, Morten

Thanks Shawn for your reply I tried to bring the heap size to 5gb as you would like, but the problem was not solved. "/If you have configured fts_solr with a URL that contains a # character, it's never going to work./" I'm not sure how to configure this but in the 90-plugins.conf file I configured this: plugin { ??#setting_name = value ??fts = solr ??fts_solr = url =

what anti-spam for you used ? dspam?spammassian? amavisd-new ? what is best ?

Hi all, are there any pitfalls known for the migration from 2.0.18 to 2.1? Can I simply stop dovecot, make install and start again? --Frank Elsner

Ok, so another apc UPS 3000 complained about bad batteries, and I changed them out from the same order that I'd gotten in a couple of months ago. The APC SmartUPS 3000 started connecting and disconnecting the USB connection. I brought down and up the service, no joy. Finally, after googling, I found a *completely* undocumented way to start apcupsd, that a few years ago someone was told to

Dear All   I have the following code set up: Code #1 a <-matrix(seq(0,8, by = sign(8-0)*0.25)) b <-matrix(seq(8,16, by = sign(16-8)*0.25)) c <-runif(1000,50,60) d <-exp(-c*a)+exp(-c*b)   This will give me the obvious error message of lengths not matching. What I am trying to do here is to have 33 rows x 1000 columns d values calculated in total. As an eaxmple for visual, this is what

Hi everyone Given that I am not an expert, I am doing tests with Solr, I installed following the guide but I have no benefits on the search, the search on the body on 28000 mails takes a few minutes and then goes to timeout. I had installed version 8.2.0 of solr then I thought that there is something not compatible with centos 7 so I installed version 7.7.0 as an example on the guide

I've just had a 4.9p1 system partially deadlock for about 30 minutes and then spontaneously(?) recover. The "ps" results point at vinum. I've never seen this before and don't recall anything like this being mentioned here before. At the time, I had two find's running in a large NFS mounted filesystem and was doing a "cvs -d /usr/ncvs -R checkout -P ports" from

Hi, It is probably a problem with pigeonhole 0.2.5. ... make[3]: *** [managesieve-proxy.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... Here is my build log: http://oss.imt-systems.com/mstevens/temp/build.log Someone an idea? Best regards, Morten

Where on the CentOS website does one find the CentOS-6 CR repo install package? I can find the one for CentOS-5 but not for 6. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1

Hi, I have > 11 TB hard used Mailstorage, saved als maildir in ext3 on HP EVA. I always wanted to make some mesurements about several influences to the performance (switch to ext4, switch to mdbox), but I never had enough time to do that. At the moment I *need* more speed, we have too much waitI/O on the system and I already used all other performance and tuning-tricks (separated cache,

Here is a small btrfs vs. ext4 benchmark with kernel 2.6.37-rc1. compilebench with options -i 10 -r 30 on 2.6.37-rc1 btrfs ========================================================================== intial create total runs 10 avg 73.11 MB/s (user 0.34s sys 1.96s) create total runs 5 avg 49.53 MB/s (user 0.41s sys 1.62s) patch total runs 4 avg 22.13 MB/s (user 0.09s sys 1.79s) compile total runs

I just upgraded our Director to 2.2.29.1 from 2.2.26, and now my dmesg and /var/log/messages are getting flooded by these errors: lmtp[45758]: segfault at 21 ip 00007fb412d3ad11 sp 00007ffe83ad2df0 error 4 in libdovecot.so.0.0.0[7fb412c95000+11c000] lmtp[46304]: segfault at 91 ip 00007f771ba64d11 sp 00007ffe830635a0 error 4 in libdovecot.so.0.0.0[7f771b9bf000+11c000] lmtp[45775]: segfault at

[root at host ~]# yum clean all Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, protectbase Cleaning up Everything Cleaning up list of fastest mirrors [root at ost ~]# yum search libcli Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, protectbase Determining fastest mirrors * base: centos-distro.cavecreek.net * elrepo: elrepo.imt-systems.com * extras: ftp.ussg.iu.edu * rpmforge: apt.sw.be * updates: mirror.nandomedia.com base

Hi All, I am working on some ordinal logistic regresssions using LRM in the Design package. My response variable has three categories (1,2,3) and after using the creating my model and using a call to predict some values and I wanted to use a simple .5 cut-off to classify my probabilities into the categories. I had two questions: a) first, I am having trouble directly accessing the

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925961 -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: segfault in libdovecot-storage at unknown circumstances Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 16:34:15 +0300 From: sergio <sergio+it at outerface.net> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit at bugs.debian.org> Package: dovecot-core Version: 1:2.3.4.1-1~bpo9+1 Severity: normal Yes, I know this is

Hi all, Space is starting to get a bit tight here, so I''m looking at adding a couple of TB to my home server. I''m considering external USB or FireWire attached drive enclosures. Cost is a real issue, but I also want the data to be managed by ZFS--so enclosures without a JBOD option have been disgarded (i.e., I don''t want to use any internal HW RAID controllers). One

Hello. I am new to this forum. If this issue has been discussed already, please inform me, but my STFW have indicated that it has not. If SS7 were available on * would it make commercial sense to use it? There are case studies on the web (courtesy of the Death Star :->) for ISPs with 10,000+ subscriber lines showing clear cost savings in transitioning from PRI to SS7 controlled IMT. My

Hi, Does Asterisk, provide the option within its voice mail system to be able to do the following: We want to have an option to be able to have two mail boxes on one ext. For example: we want to be able to have a French Mailbox and a English one... So I can say the following... You have reached ext 000 to continue this message in French press example 3 - and it would then go to my French