similar to: v2.0.10 released

Hi, We have clients with various security & compliance requirements. Although not required, it would be ideal to have messages encrypted at rest. We already use SSL/TLS to secure the transmission of most email. However, it would be nice to have them encrypted sitting on our server. Is anyone doing this? I think that ideally, rather than full-disk encryption, we should use an encryption that

Any ideas on why callers who call into my customer's SIP trunk are not hearing a ringback tone? I had this on one other asterisk system, and wound up needing to set progressinband=yes in the SIP trunk config. I have set this on the current system & restarted asterisk, but to no avail. I am using: AsteriskNOW distro Asterisk build is 1.6 from AsteriskNOW repository:

This morning on our newly built server, the following was logged twice: auth: Error: pam(username,127.0.0.1): pam_authenticate() failed: Authentication failure (/etc/pam.d/dovecot missing?) This also happened to be during a time of 100+ imap-login processes, where we were seeing: master: Warning: service(imap-login): process_limit reached, client connections are being dropped The initial error

1.2? 1.4? 1.6? 1.8? Thanks, - Doug Mortensen Network Consultant Impala Networks Inc CCNA, MCSA, Security+, A+ Linux+, Network+, Server+ . www.impalanetworks.com P: (505) 327-7300 F: (505) 327-7545

Today I found out we are having users w/ problems because: Mar 3 09:57:33 jlgray dovecot: master: Warning: service(imap-login): process_limit reached, client connections are being dropped Mar 3 09:58:42 jlgray dovecot: master: Warning: service(imap-login): process_limit reached, client connections are being dropped Mar 3 10:02:51 jlgray dovecot: master: Warning: service(imap-login):

Hello. I have a software developer creating a .Net / mono program to use as an AGI script. We are having problems getting it to stream files. From what we can tell, it is talking to asterisk correctly when called from the dial plan. Its stderr output goes to the asterisk console. But asterisk doesn't give any indication that it receives the STREAM FILE command. Asterisk simply quickly

Hello all, I have been running asterisk systems since summer of 2008. I do not claim to be an expert. But I have worked through many issues during this period. I have setup & manage 5 systems, which serve 6 companies total (and of course process calls for all of the people they do business with). I have always been happy with asterisk (well, obviously less happy during the problem times...

Hi, I currently have some systems on AsteriskNOW 1.7 & have been happy with its clean simplicity & reliability. Are many people here using AsteriskNOW 2.0.x? How do you feel about it? Did Digium stick with their previous philosophy of keeping everything very vanilla & making it clean & simple for someone who understands how to manage CentOS, FreePBX, tftp, ntpd, etc. but

Hi, Does a parameter exist for a queue to delay ringing/sending a caller to all agent phones after the previous call is answered by an agent? My queue ring strategy is set to ringall. I am using Polycom KIRK wireless DECT SIP phones. And it looks like the KIRK wireless server may need a split send to realize all wireless phones are no longer ringing (busy) after 1 call rings & is unanswered,

I have an asterisk system where the asterisk daemon dies typically at least once per day. It is running in the wrapper safe_asterisk, which automatically starts the daemon back up. But we find this unacceptable because when the daemon dies, we usually have active calls drop, and sometimes we have to run asterisk -r -x "module reload" after the daemon starts back up before everything is

Hello everyone. I am wondering whether there is a certain technique I should use to identify all log lines in the asterisk/full logfile that are related to a single call. If a user reports that something strange happened with a certain call, I'd like to be able to easily go back and look at the asterisk/full logfile, and look at only the lines that are relevant. I am having some difficulty

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/rc/dovecot-2.1.rc1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/rc/dovecot-2.1.rc1.tar.gz.sig I'll probably release v2.1.0 pretty soon, unless people report some new bugs. I know v2.1 is already being used to serve mails to tens (or hundreds?) of thousands of users, so it should be pretty stable. Most of the changes since v2.1.beta1 have been for rather small

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/rc/dovecot-2.1.rc1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/rc/dovecot-2.1.rc1.tar.gz.sig I'll probably release v2.1.0 pretty soon, unless people report some new bugs. I know v2.1 is already being used to serve mails to tens (or hundreds?) of thousands of users, so it should be pretty stable. Most of the changes since v2.1.beta1 have been for rather small

Now that v2.0 seems to be getting stable, I finally started v2.1 branch: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/ So far there are just some API changes to fix some annoyances and to make it simpler. They'll probably keep coming for a while more to make future work easier. As for larger upcoming features, I'm hoping for: - simplify index files and make it write only via lib-fs (but keep

Hi, all, Please tell me about the patch and description below. https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/5f46b863383fc94afcd2693ecae8788cb5fdd20c example-config: Use a default uncommented "namespace inbox". https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/namespace/ There's a default inbox namespace added in 10-mail.conf. If the configuration doesn't explicitly specify a

Today I found our dovecot 2.x gracefully logged: dovecot: master: Warning: service(imap-login): process_limit reached, client connections are being dropped I am confident that we had the very same problem on our previous dovecot 1.x box. Of course with dovecot 1.x, the same relative setting is login_max_processes_count. I believe that I turned up all dovecot logging & debugging to the max

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 7:39 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Good points David, I don't feel qualified to evaluate the differences > >> between those versions though... Perhaps Richard or Doug could comment > here? > > > > Unless

Interesting since imap_acl also makes dovecot segfault. Maybe there is a problem in the way Dovecot loads plugins? Cheers, Olivier On 16/01/2011 19:09, dovecot-request at dovecot.org wrote: > Send dovecot mailing list submissions to > dovecot at dovecot.org > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 12:50:17 +0100 > From: "G.Nau" <b404_r66 at yahoo.de> >

A lot of doveadm commands process users' mails. They can optionally process either a single user or multiple users (e.g. -A = all, -u '*@domain.org'). For example to expunge old mails from everyone's Trash, you'd use: doveadm expunge -A mailbox Trash savedbefore 30d The problem is, this doesn't work with the new director way of doing proxying. Only a single server can

Hello... Currently in the process of upgrading Samba v2.0.10 to Samba v3.0.x, while conducting some minimal testing, it turns-out that Samba v3.0.x is performing slower than Samba v2.0.10. Set-ups: A. Samba v3.0.x --> Same PC client is accessing the samba share running on Red Hat 4.5 (64bit, HP DL380) which in turn has an NFS mount coming from another SAN attached Red Hat 4.5 (64bit, HP