similar to: mysql-3.23.58-1.72.2.src.rpm missing for Centos 2.1 mirror

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "mysql-3.23.58-1.72.2.src.rpm missing for Centos 2.1 mirror"

2005 Mar 20
7
CentOS-2 errata
The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2005:303-01 Important: sylpheed security update Files available: sylpheed-0.5.0-3.EL21.1.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update --
2004 Oct 20
26
CentOS-2 errata
The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2004:494-01 Updated ImageMagick packages fix security vulnerabilities This package contains a fix for RedHat bug #62100:ImageMagick does not start from Gnome menu panel. The release number has been updated to indicate that this package has been modified for CentOS-2. Files available:
2004 May 27
27
CentOS-2 errata
The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror RHSA-2004:174 Updated utempter package fixes vulnerability RHSA-2004:178 An updated LHA package fixes security vulnerabilities RHSA-2004:219 Updated tcpdump packages fix various vulnerabilities John. -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of
2004 Dec 16
26
CentOS-2 errata
The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2004:634-01 Updated zip package fixes security issue Files available: zip-2.3-10.1.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John
2005 Sep 22
2
Converting from RHEL to CentOS questions.
I have servers that are running: Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 3 (Taroon Update 5) and Red Hat Linux Advanced Server release 2.1AS (Pensacola) [which I think RH renamed as Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 2.1]. The servers are running fine. Is it possible (and if so, how) to convert these to the equivalent releases of CentOS, without doing a complete upgrade (I want to mess with the
2004 Jul 26
2
CentOS-2 errata
The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2004:404-01 Updated samba packages fix vulnerability Files available: samba-2.2.10-1.21as.1.i386.rpm: samba-client-2.2.10-1.21as.1.i386.rpm: samba-common-2.2.10-1.21as.1.i386.rpm: samba-swat-2.2.10-1.21as.1.i386.rpm: More details are available from the RedHat web site at
2005 Jan 24
2
CentOS-2 errata
The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2005:016-01 Updated kernel packages fix security vulnerabilities Files available: kernel-2.4.9-e.59.athlon.rpm kernel-smp-2.4.9-e.59.athlon.rpm kernel-BOOT-2.4.9-e.59.i386.rpm: kernel-doc-2.4.9-e.59.i386.rpm: kernel-headers-2.4.9-e.59.i386.rpm: kernel-source-2.4.9-e.59.i386.rpm: kernel-2.4.9-e.59.i686.rpm:
2005 Mar 03
2
rpm corruption
I have recently deployed a number of CentOS-3.4 boxes and I am seeing problems with rpm database apparent corruption. db4 errors like DB_PAGE_NOTFOUND. I have found that using LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 seems to fix the problem but I can''t find much info on why or if doing that is good or bad. I have done --rebuilddb but with the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL that might be making thinks worse... I just
2005 Feb 22
1
Slow logout from gnome
I don't know if anyone else has had this problem but on a number of CentOS-3 boxes I had a problem when you log out from X/Gnome it would take ages (> 1 min) to log out. Saving the session made it quicker for the next logout, but the culprit appears to be the rhn-applet. Uninstall that rpm and problem solved. John. -- John Newbigin Computer Systems Officer Faculty of Information and
2006 Nov 08
1
CSGFS repository not up-to-date?
Let me QUICKLY say I'm not complaining here, but is the csgfs repository not being actively maintained? The Red Hat ftp site has much newer versions available than what is currently in the CentOS csgfs repo, at least for the kernel modules. Should I just go ahead and rebuild them from the SRPMs myself, or is this an unintended condition? This has been holding me up from upgrading to the
2008 Oct 06
3
[Fwd: Re: Install CentOS-5.0 on HP-ComPaq DC7700 Dual Core]
---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: Re: [CentOS] Install CentOS-5.0 on HP-ComPaq DC7700 Dual Core From: "James B. Byrne" <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> Date: Mon, October 6, 2008 12:26 To: cenos at centos.org Cc: "John Newbigin" <jnewbigin at ict.swin.edu.au>
2004 Apr 06
1
Status of CentOS 2.1
Hi! What is status of CentOS 2.1? Is it still developed, when is a stable release planed? Can i use it for non-critical production? What i can do, to help with CentOS 2.1? Regards J.Pinkis
2006 Sep 27
1
rebuilding centos 2.1 isos
Hi, I'm attempting to rebuild CentOS 2.1 ISOs with the latest kernel (to attempt installation on some newer hardware with SATA drives). It seems that the original build environment used different version of anaconda than shipped with CentOS 2.1 (7.2-77_ELAS vs 7.2.32AS). I found SRPM of 7.2.32AS, however I'm wondering if there is binary package also? BTW, any hints on the
2008 Apr 25
3
dmidecode for CentOS 2.1? [hardware serial number and type]
Hi CentOS users I have here old CentOS 2.1 server on IBM Xseries 336. How to see serial number and machine type? It seems that "dmidecode" is not available for CentOS 2.1 cheers Simon -- XMPP: sjolle at swissjabber.org
2006 Oct 15
2
CentOS 2.1 on i586
I've just attempted to reinstall my ancient laptop that has Pentium MMX processor. Since it is ancient, I've decided to go with CentOS 2.1. Got stuck, installer claims I need at least i686. Hmmm... I know that 3.8 and 4.4 work without a glitch on i586, so this came as surprise. I even thing original RHEL2.1 might had support for i586 too (but I might be wrong). Anyhow, what
2006 Apr 01
1
CESA-2005:472 Important CentOS 3 i386 kernel - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:472 kernel security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-472.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.4.21-32.0.1.EL.athlon.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.4.21-32.0.1.EL.i586.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.4.21-32.0.1.EL.i686.rpm
2006 Apr 01
1
CESA-2005:472 Important CentOS 3 i386 kernel - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:472 kernel security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-472.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.4.21-32.0.1.EL.athlon.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.4.21-32.0.1.EL.i586.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.4.21-32.0.1.EL.i686.rpm
2006 Aug 29
3
smbmount
Is there a method or way that will allow one to automagically mount samba shares requiring a password w/o using a plain text password? Even if I have to store the plaintext password in a file, is there at least a way to keep plain text passwords going over the network (IPSec perhaps)? === Al
2004 Dec 03
1
CentOS-3 errata - updated kernel packages fix security vulnerabilities
A new kernel is available for CentOS-3 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-549.html refers Updated files are :- updates/i386/RPMS/ kernel-2.4.21-20.0.1.EL.athlon.rpm kernel-2.4.21-20.0.1.EL.i686.rpm kernel-BOOT-2.4.21-20.0.1.EL.i386.rpm kernel-doc-2.4.21-20.0.1.EL.i386.rpm kernel-hugemem-2.4.21-20.0.1.EL.i686.rpm kernel-hugemem-unsupported-2.4.21-20.0.1.EL.i686.rpm
2005 Sep 14
3
CentOS + GFS + EtherDrive
I am considering building a pair of storage servers that will be using CentOS and GFS to share the storage from a Coraid (SATA+Raid) EtherDrive shelf. Has anyone else tried such a setup? Is GFS stable enough to use in a production environment? There is a build of GFS 6.1 at http://rpm.karan.org/el4/csgfs/. Has anyone used this? Is it stable? Will I run into any problems if I use CentOS 3.5