similar to: quota sql dict permissions dilemma

Hi! I've upgraded from 2.0.11 to 2.0.12. I've experienced errors during delivery with dovecot-lda. The error log attached contains the errors. Since then I had to downgrade to 2.0.11, to make it work again. When starting 2.0.12, it couldn't chown() the files under /var/dovecot (eg.: dict) to the user specified in the configuration file. Configuration: # doveconf -n # 2.0.11:

Hi! I've been getting a bunch of these messages lately in my logs: dovecot: master: Error: service(auth): Initial status notification not received in 30 seconds, killing the process dovecot: auth: Fatal: master: service(auth): child 11016 killed with signal 9 dovecot: master: Error: service(auth): Initial status notification not received in 30 seconds, killing the process dovecot: auth:

Hi! I'm trying to get information about a server certificate from a pigeonhole sieve server. Various connection attempts show only "wrong version number" or "unknown protocol" errors from openssl: $ openssl s_client -connect example.com:4190 { -tls1, -tls1_1, -tls1_2 } [ -starttls { imap, pop3 } ] None of these work. I'm trying to see who signed the server cert. How

Hi! Is it necessary for Dovecot2 to send it a SIGHUP when I rotate its log files? I'm asking because then I must turn off the 'shutdown_clients' option, because then every user gets disconnected while rotating the logs. Daniel -- L?VAI D?niel PGP key ID = 0x83B63A8F Key fingerprint = DBEC C66B A47A DFA2 792D 650C C69B BE4C 83B6 3A8F

Hi! I noticed these messages in my logs. It seems that the user checked the "encrypted password" in her outlook or something, and wants NTLM auth. I'm storing all the passwords as SSHA256, and when the user tries to auth, this happens: => dovecot.info auth: Info: password(<username>,<user_ip>): Requested NTLM scheme, but we have only SSHA256 auth: Debug:

Hi! I noticed that this command ... : for USERNAME in ${USERS};do /usr/local/bin/doveadm -Dv expunge -u "${USERNAME}" mailbox sa.* SAVEDBEFORE 1d done ... does not expunge mails if ran from crontab. It shows in the Debug output what would have been done, but it doesn't really expunge those mails. This command runs daily, and every day the list of expunged mails (in the Debug

Hi! I've upgraded to 2.0.3 from 1.2, and it is so far so good. I especially like the new doveadm tool. I have only one tiny problem: Every time I try to upload a message to the server (eg. to a 'Sent' folder, while sending a message), it fails with an error saying I'm over my quota. I'm using mutt, and this is the exact message I get in mutt: [OVERQUOTA] Quota exceeded

Hi! I have some questions about doveadm-expunge's debug messages. # /usr/local/bin/doveadm -Dv expunge -u <user> mailbox 'sa.*' SAVEDBEFORE 6h doveadm(root): Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/local/lib/dovecot doveadm(root): Debug: Module loaded: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/lib10_quota_plugin.so doveadm(root): Debug: Module loaded:

-----Original Message----- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas Kovacs Sent: den 19 september 2017 09:37 To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Subject: [CentOS] CentOS, PHP & OwnCloud/Nextcloud: the version dilemma Hi, I'm currently experimenting with OwnCloud and Nextcloud on a sandbox CentOS 7 server. I've been using OwnCloud for

Am 2017-09-19 09:36, schrieb Nicolas Kovacs: > Hi, > > I'm currently experimenting with OwnCloud and Nextcloud on a sandbox > CentOS 7 server. I've been using OwnCloud for the last two years for my > own purposes on a Slackware server, and I'm quite happy with it. > > In my humble opinion, every admin who wants to host OwnCloud or > Nextcloud on a RHEL/CentOS

I have a dilemma. I am trying to setup an asterisk setup for about 10 people, but with the ability to expand to 100s. We are looking into hardphones to use for our systems. Here are the requirments I am looking for: SIP Not POE Full duplex Speakerphone $100-$300 We would like to have the cordless and corded option if possible (at least for 3 of the 10 people). So here are the

Unfortunately the same can be said about Ruby, RoR, Python etc etc etc. Personally I think it's perfectly reasonable to track Nextcloud upgrades combined with SCL major upgrades once every couple of years. Check life times here: https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/rhscl -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- >

Le 19/09/2017 ? 09:48, Sorin Srbu a ?crit?: > I agree however, everytime I want to mess with OC I get to do the php-dance... > Irritating, but I guess that's the deal if you want the stability and > compatibility CentOS is offering. This may be a very far-fetched idea, but here goes. I don't know much about Docker, just fiddled around with it a couple hours in a VM. Since I have

On 09/19/2017 06:41 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 19.09.2017 um 09:36 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr>: >> >> I'm currently experimenting with OwnCloud and Nextcloud on a sandbox >> CentOS 7 server. I've been using OwnCloud for the last two years for my >> own purposes on a Slackware server, and I'm quite happy with it. >> >> In

RHEL 6.5 Puppet 3.7.1 puppetlabs-stdlib-4.3.2 Local hardening guidelines say that /usr/local and /var/log/audit have to be separate partitions. OK, so I make "mount" resources. Now the problem: The order of the mount points in /etc/fstab makes a difference. I had /usr/local before /usr, and at boot, the mount of /usr/local failed because the mount point did not (yet) exist. So I need

If you want eth0 to be used and no dynamic IP configuration request should not occur in the Linux kernel, specify *both* APPEND and IPAPPEND options like: APPEND ip=:::::eth0:none IPAPPEND 1 It's very tricky but it works, at least Linux 2.4.18 which I tested. The IP-PNP routine in the kernel doesn't modify values if the option values are not explicitly specified. IPAPPEND doesn't

Le 19/09/2017 ? 13:41, Leon Fauster a ?crit?: > Try to ask upstream (bugzilla) to evaluate an officially upgrade > from 5.4 to 5.6, that would give you support until EOL of EL7. Unfortunately I don't have a Red Hat account, so I can't submit any bug reports. Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat Web :

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Tue, September 19, 2017 1:42 pm, Nux! wrote: >> Unfortunately the same can be said about Ruby, RoR, Python etc etc etc. > > It is not as much true about languages themselves (though it is true, and > I for one call python "sneaky snake" just because of that ;-), as about <snip> Yeah, in addition to my reaction to "you're

Straying OT ... > > On Tue, September 19, 2017 1:42 pm, Nux! wrote: > > > Unfortunately the same can be said about Ruby, RoR, Python etc etc etc. > > > > It is not as much true about languages themselves (though it is true, and > > I for one call python "sneaky snake" just because of that ;-), as about > > <snip> > Yeah, in addition to

Am 19.09.2017 um 09:36 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr>: > > I'm currently experimenting with OwnCloud and Nextcloud on a sandbox > CentOS 7 server. I've been using OwnCloud for the last two years for my > own purposes on a Slackware server, and I'm quite happy with it. > > In my humble opinion, every admin who wants to host OwnCloud or >