similar to: how to upgrade (update) the dovecot

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "how to upgrade (update) the dovecot"

2010 Oct 01
0
dovecot Digest, Vol 90, Issue 3
Dear All, Thanks for all your replied but still I don't know how to install from 1.0.7 to 1.2.14. What should I consider to keep the same configuration during or after upgrade? It is the first time I am trying to upgrade my Dovecot. Thank a lot for your help --- On Fri, 1/10/10, dovecot-request at dovecot.org <dovecot-request at dovecot.org> wrote: From: dovecot-request at
2010 Oct 01
2
how to upgrade dovecot
Dear All, I have Centos 5 and devecot 1.0.7 I want to upgrade it to the latest version. I will appreciate if any one can tell me how can I upgrade it please. Thanks Arif
2016 Mar 26
2
Email hosting provider
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 13:34:34 +1000 Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote: > On 21/03/2016 17:06, Andre Rodier wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Sorry if I am off topic a little. > > > > I am looking for an email host provider that supports dovecot, sieve > > and manage sieve. Ideally with the roundcube webmail and managesieve > > plugin >
2017 Nov 07
2
dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?
On Tue, 07 Nov 2017 13:19:12 +1000 Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote: > mail_location Optionally disable indexes using :INDEX=MEMORY > > don't use this on IMAP boxes, but is safe to use on SMTP and POP3's > boxes though > > eg: > > mail_location = > maildir:/var/vmail/%Ld/%1Ln/%1.1Ln/%2.1Ln/%Ln/Maildir:INDEX=MEMORY > > --
2009 Oct 07
1
Fwd: Re: "Time just moved backwards" in Dovecot in a Xen DomU
Dunno, your email provider doesn't want to talk to me, heh, screw them :) They claim i'm on an rbl, no rbl checks verify this. Even tried to submit a request using their website, but it's broken and doesn't work (http://postmaster.ausics.net/pmg.php) ----- Forwarded message from patrickdk at patrickdk.com ----- Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:31:37 -0400 From: Patrick
2016 Mar 13
2
NetApp NFS vs. ZFS and NFS for Maildir
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:32:42 +1000 Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote: > On 13/03/2016 20:47, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:06 +0000 > > James <lista at xdrv.co.uk> wrote: > > > >> On 11/03/2016 15:17, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > >> > >> > zfs set sync=disabled ? > >> >
2016 Mar 14
2
NetApp NFS vs. ZFS and NFS for Maildir
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:59:28 +1000 Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote: > On 14/03/2016 09:59, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:32:42 +1000 > > Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote: > > > >> On 13/03/2016 20:47, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > >> > On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:06 +0000 > >>
2010 Aug 18
2
OT [Fwd: Fwd: Re: EVERYONE USING DOVECOT PLEASE SIGN: Thanks, Administrators of Dovecot!]
CharlesMarcus LOL, you kinda contradicted yourself here charlie boy and personal RBL? yup, but its not just used by me, its used by a few if you read the link, a few involving millions of emails a day, but shouldnt be a problem giving the geographical locations... and lied? list msgs caught in spam rules, I guess you dont know how to configure SA URI's... now, please stop trying to avoid
2011 Oct 13
1
nut 2.6.2 possible bug
Built for years every version using: ./configure --with-usb Configuration summary: ====================== build serial drivers: yes build USB drivers: yes build SNMP drivers: yes build neon based XML driver: yes build Powerman PDU client driver: no build IPMI driver: no enable SSL development code: yes enable libwrap (tcp-wrappers) support: yes build CGI programs: no enable HAL support: no
2017 Apr 29
0
Dovecot last_login plugin and Mysql
Hi, Thanks for the pointing out of the oops! I missed that. Don't worry that has been changed. Any suggestions on my issue? Thanks. Dave. On 4/28/17, David Mehler <dave.mehler at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > OOPS! I missed that one and it was big. > > Changing now. > > Thanks. > Dave. > > > On 4/28/17, Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net>
2017 Aug 15
2
migrating 2.1 to 3.x, sql pass scheme, pass value?
On 15/08/2017 22:23, Noel Butler wrote: > On 15/08/2017 21:25, voytek at sbt.net.au wrote: > >> On Tue, August 15, 2017 8:03 pm, Sami Ketola wrote: >> On 15 Aug 2017, at 2.50, voytek at sbt.net.au wrote: >> >> how do I generate hashed string from my password ? >> use this sql command: >> >> GRANT SELECT ON vmail TO
2018 Dec 02
1
Mailing list address harvested for spamming
On 02/12/2018 10:16, Michael A. Peters wrote: > On 12/01/2018 04:09 PM, Noel Butler wrote: > >> Which is why it annoys me that some people on mailing lists feel the need to reply directly, rather than through mailing list. > > Sometimes it is the MUA that is poorly designed that causes this. I could have sworn I said that, oh yes, I see I did > Also, some lists set the
2017 Nov 07
0
dovecot-lda without starting dovecot?
On 7 Nov 2017, at 9.15, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 07 Nov 2017 13:19:12 +1000 > Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote: > >> mail_location Optionally disable indexes using :INDEX=MEMORY >> >> don't use this on IMAP boxes, but is safe to use on SMTP and POP3's >> boxes though >>
2018 Dec 07
3
BUG: sieve does not set seen-Flag
On 07/12/2018 16:44, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 6.12.2018 6.54, Noel Butler wrote: > > On 06/12/2018 07:29, Jakobus Sch?rz wrote: > > that all and every Flag is set, except \Seen... I tried to figure out, whats happening here... > > Paste what your sieve file contains now (no, I'm not going back over this thread - its becoming as long as war and peace, and you may have
2018 Dec 06
2
BUG: sieve does not set seen-Flag
On 06/12/2018 07:29, Jakobus Sch?rz wrote: > that all and every Flag is set, except \Seen... I tried to figure out, whats happening here... Paste what your sieve file contains now (no, I'm not going back over this thread - its becoming as long as war and peace, and you may have changed it since then) > Please understand me right... It is nice for you, if dovecot does, what you
2019 Feb 10
3
offtopic: rant about thoughtless enabling DMARC checks
On 10/02/2019 12:49, Benny Pedersen via dovecot wrote: > fixing mailman will be the fail, solve it by letting opendkim and opendmarc not reject detected maillist will be solution, A general broad mailing list whitelist will be problematic, do work it needs to look for specific list type hidden headers, spammers and nasties will incorporate those headers into their trash that impersonates
2019 Feb 10
1
offtopic: rant about thoughtless enabling DMARC checks
On 2/10/19 3:46 PM, Michael A. Peters via dovecot wrote: > On 2/10/19 3:42 PM, Noel Butler via dovecot wrote: >> On 10/02/2019 12:49, Benny Pedersen via dovecot wrote: >> >>> >>> fixing mailman will be the fail, solve it by letting opendkim and >>> opendmarc not reject detected maillist will be solution, >> >> >> A general broad mailing
2018 Dec 02
2
Mailing list address harvested for spamming
On 02/12/2018 11:00, Hendrik Boom wrote: > There's an extensive email etiquette post somewhere on the net > explaining why setting 'reply-to' to the list is a bad idea. Lots of posts around about this, all self serving :) There may of course be an RFC floating around, but I admit to never having bothered to look, because good netizens reply to list, lists are public, they
2018 Dec 02
6
Mailing list address harvested for spamming
On 02/12/2018 05:31, M. Balridge wrote: > Quoting dovecot-e51 at deemzed.uk: > >> Not to stir the pot, but I notice my email address has recently been >> harvested from this list for spamming purposes. This email address is >> unique and not used for anything else. >> >> I'd distinguish this from spam sent to the mailing list itself, which is >>
2019 Feb 10
2
offtopic: rant about thoughtless enabling DMARC checks
On 10/02/2019 07:38, Ralph Seichter via dovecot wrote: > * Juri Haberland via dovecot: > >> Blindly enabling DMARC checks without thinking about the consequences >> for themselves should not be the problem of other well behaving >> participants. > > Can you judge if DMARC is enabled "blindly"? No, I thought not. Also, > the issue was not on the