similar to: authentication failure with known good credentials???

I am curious what is the best way to upgrade my dom0 and domUs to V.6 (currently 5) when it releases. Any experience or docs on this? Dave -- "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." Krishnamurti

I manage a web hosting server that we've recently upgraded, in part so we could accommodate a domain that will enable community mapping. In a recent exchange of mails one developer said: "I could build the package directly on the server machine you have, provided that the potential security risk posed by having compilers installed is not an issue." and another said:

Hello All, I don't have any reason to believe CENTOS (5.4) is underlying my difficulties but it's what I've got to work with so here's the setup: I have a 2P motherboard with 2 Opteron 2376s and two ethernet ports. The setup is fully virtualized, with Dom0, dom4 and Dom1 up and running. dom4 is attached to a dhcp service on eth0 and has no problems. I've recently

Hi, I'm using CentOS on a box that, among other things, offers mailman mailing lists, currently mailman 2.1.9. Version 2.1.14 is avilable from the developers but integrating it into the system promises to be tedious. I looked at RHEL 6 and don't know where to look to find the version there, which I assume will be the version in CentOS 6. Can anyone either confirm what version

I have a CentOS server with postfix running. A pop user's account was compromised and a lot of spam started being sent. My upstream ISP's mail program started refusing to talk to me because of the very high rate of mail, error 451. I disabled the compromised account. I then changed the postfix settings to deliver mail directly and flushed the mail queue. This resulted in spam

Hi, I have a Centos 5 box with dom0 and several domUs and one of them is not runnable. I ran updates several days ago and the update included a kernel update so I used virt-manager to reboot. But it won't book. It shows as not running and when I try to run it I get a dialog box with this: Traceback (most recent call last): File

I'm in yum dependency hell using epel, rpmforge and rpmfusion repos to install vlc on 32 bit Centos 5.5. Anyone have a better idea? Doesn't really have to be vlc I just want to be able to play a dvd and Movie Player complains about missing plugins without saying what they are. Dave -- "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society."

Hi folks, I'm new to WINE and have actually read the docs, so go easy on me. My machine is setup to dual boot between Red Hat 7.2 and Windows2000. This is what I get when I try to run Eudora 5.1 from my Win2k partition. This is as far it'll go--no window ever displays. I get identical results with either WINE 20020122 or a CVS snapshot from yesterday evening. Let me know if

I have used Eudora since v 1.35 (circa '93). For quite some time, I have enjoyed keeping each of my mail accounts' folders in totally separate directory trees. In Eudora you do this by specifying the data locatoin as part of the startup: '<program location>/eudora.exe <data location>' So I am quite spoiled. But there is no Eudora support in Linux/CentOS. So

For about a week a biug stack of updates have been pending for CENTOS but I can't install them. The yum update command leads to dependency resolution in the usual way but it always ends in this: ---> Package poppler-utils.i386 0:0.5.4-4.4.el5_4.11 set to be updated ---> Package xorg-x11-drv-qxl.i386 0:0.0.12-1.2.el5 set to be updated --> Running transaction check -->

First off, thanks to the Wine team-- the 10/4 build is the closest to working well with Eudora I have had since the one I currently run, which was 1/12/01. Second, thanks to Lawson Whitney for sending me the socket patch so I could get the 10/4 build on the net! Now, Eudora Light 3.0.5 is running much better under the 10/4 build. A few little things are still wrong. Running just "wine

There seems to be a protocol mismatch between eudora and dovecot when using pop. The login interchange with, for example, mozilla, is as follows: MO: [connects] DC: +OK dovecot ready. MO: CAPA DC: +OK DC: CAPA DC: TOP DC: USER DC: UIDL DC: RESP-CODES DC: STLS DC: SASL PLAIN DC: . MO: USER yyy DC: +OK MO: PASS xxxxxxxx DC: +OK Logged in. But with eudora, with apparently equivalent

I'm having major problems with the 10/4 Wine release. Currently the only thing I really use Wine for is Eudora Light 3.0.5. The most stable release for me thus far has been wine-20010112, which is what I'm using right now. Most of the releases since then have had window problems with Eudora-- messages having too much blank space, strange things. So I tried 1004, and it has a new

I'm trying to get Dovecot (dovecot-0.99.10-6) to work with Eudora (6.0 mac/win) and am having a real problem when I try to enable SSL, either TLS or alternate-port SSL. Although my other mail clients, mail.app, imp, etc. work just fine, either version of Eudora craps out when trying to connect via TLS or SSL -- on the mac I get the error Could not get mailbox list. 20 [CLOSED]

Has anyone been able to get Eudora Pro 5.x working with wine? I've got Red Hat 7.1, and I'm trying to get my Eudora Pro 5.0 running on my linux box, but so far, no luck. Thanks, David

Hi, I recently had problems setting up Eudora to store its data on a network share. The problem was that while it did work, it was incredibly slow, I would estimate about 10 times slower than it should be. I did some experimentation and found that it worked properly if the client was running Windows 98, but not if the client was running Windows 95. I could also get rid of the problem by turning

I love the routes feature for RoR...until now. I''m trying to write tests to make sure my urls are correctly mapping to the routes I expect them to map to. This is driving me nuts because I simply can''t get any of my tests to pass. I have thus concluded that routes must work differently than I thought. I will try to explain my understanding of how routes work. Via this

I love the routes feature for RoR...until now. I''m trying to write tests to make sure my urls are correctly mapping to the routes I expect them to map to. This is driving me nuts because I simply can''t get any of my tests to pass. I have thus concluded that routes must work differently than I thought. If someone could possibly point me in the right direction, I would really

Hi everyone, i just installed dovecot in Fedora Core release 1 (Yarrow). When accessing from a eudora 6.1 client, first it gave ssl authentication problems. I fixed disabling them in eudora, but now it authenticates ok and then it says that there is no inbox for that user. Any idea? Enrique Pedraza Valiente Formador en Lenguajes Avanzados y Nuevas Tecnolog?as cell: +34 678 51 75 19

Hi, I recently accepted some updates that broke functionality due to a change in mapserver on my centos 5.5 box. I would like to try yum downgrade mapserver but when I do it goes through the motions and gives no output. What am I missing? Dave see: [root at babine dave]# yum downgrade mapserver Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Setting up Downgrade Process Loading mirror speeds from cached