similar to: sieve plugin - reject sends MDN. Can it 550 reject ?

Hi all. I spent some time testing Dovecot's LDA sieve plugin and found problem with "notify" method. In fact it always returns "generic sieve error"... and thus produces bounce messages like this: ----- Your message was automatically rejected by Dovecot Mail Delivery Agent. The following reason was given: Unknown error ---- Deliver logs error: "generic sieve

It appears that there is some version of the Dovecot LDA that is sending an RFC 3798 MDN rather than an RFC 3464 DSN to report non-delivery to a user who is over quota. See <https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/693134> for a discussion of this and <https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/693134/+attachment/1773018/+files/Automatically%20rejected%20mail.msg> for the actual MDN

I'm testing deliver with sendmail and fs quotas. On an over quota condition, deliver accepts the mail, deletes it, then issues a MDN immediately. Is there a way to get deliver to soft fail like procmail does with a 400 error and queue the mail, then let sendmail handle the MDN, following it's "confTO_QUEUEWARN" and "confTO_QUEUERETURN" ? Thanks, Ken -- Ken

Is it possible to use the 'redirect' function in 'sieve' to forward a message as an attachment rather than in-line? -- Jerry gesbbb at yahoo.com |::::======= |::::======= |=========== |=========== | A woman was in love with fourteen soldiers, it was clearly platoonic.

Hello, i discovered that when a sieve rule "fileinto drawer;" tries to deliver a mail into a non existent drawer, the drawer gets created. This is neat, but is there also a way to automatically subcribe to the created folder ? Regards, Oliver Eales

Guys, I'm running out of hair to pull out ;). Can anyone out there say that this does work?? To me this is looking like a bug and I'm not sure whether it's the sieve plugin or the dovecot deliver program. I have also had no luck the the "reject" sending any reply back to the sender. My setup: OS: Solaris 10 sparc platform postfix: 2.5.2 dovecot: 1.1.2 sieve plugin: 1.1.5

I know that this is technically not a Dovecot problem; however, I was wondering if anyone knew if 'sieve' had been updated with the ability to 'forward as attachment' a received document. I believe it has the ability to forward a document; however, I need the ability to forward it as an attachment if possible. Also I believe, somewhat due to my asking for them, that sieve exits

Hello, I've a test system with postfix (SMTP), dovecot (IMAP only) and covecot-LDA (MDA) under FreeBSD-6.1. Currently everything works fine. But I wasn't able to install dovecot-sieve from the CVS. Does anyone has a small documentation howto install dovecot-sieve on FreeBSD. Thanks. -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal f?r Modem und ISDN:

Hello, I can get the median for each factor, but I'd like another column to go with each factor. The nm column is a long name for the lvls column. So unique work except for the order can get messed up. Example: x =

2. update ZFS in libfsimage from illumos for pygrub diff -r 7c12aaa128e3 -r c2e11847cac0 tools/libfsimage/Rules.mk --- a/tools/libfsimage/Rules.mk Thu Oct 24 22:46:20 2013 +0100 +++ b/tools/libfsimage/Rules.mk Sat Oct 26 20:03:06 2013 +0400 @@ -2,11 +2,19 @@ include $(XEN_ROOT)/tools/Rules.mk CFLAGS += -Wno-unknown-pragmas -I$(XEN_ROOT)/tools/libfsimage/common/

Hello Dovecot users, Pigeonhole development has slowed down significantly in the last few months due to the fact that I got swamped in work. The plan is now to move active development of Pigeonhole to Dovecot v2.0, meaning that this will be the last release for v1.2 that contains significant development changes and new features. However, if a certain new feature is simple enough and there is

Hello Dovecot users, Pigeonhole development has slowed down significantly in the last few months due to the fact that I got swamped in work. The plan is now to move active development of Pigeonhole to Dovecot v2.0, meaning that this will be the last release for v1.2 that contains significant development changes and new features. However, if a certain new feature is simple enough and there is

Currently the typical rejection message is: --------- Your message was automatically rejected by Dovecot Mail Delivery Agent. The following reason was given: Quota exceeded. --------- Then there is MDN + message headers in other MIME parts. But of course there sucky clients that can't display MDNs and users get confused. Any suggestions how to improve this message? I'm not sure if the

Hello, after qmail migration need convert some .procmailrc scripts. Found converter procmail -> sieve, but i'm not sure of quality of conversion. My script: --------------- if header :contains "from" ["user at domain1.tld", "user2 at domain2.tld", "user3 at domain3.tld"] { redirect "foo1 at bar.tld"; redirect "foo2 at

Hi all, I have Dovecot 1.2.13 installed. My clients ask why Disposition-Notification is requested every time the mail is moved on a new IMAP folder... I take a look into dovecot-keywords file and I see that: 1) I have only one row 0 NonJunk 2) dovecot-keywords file is not present inside every directory. How I can restore normal status? Where is probably the problem? Thanks Mauro D.

Hi, after having moved a big mail archive to IMAP, I've now got the following problem: The MUA asks to send an MDN on all those old messages that contain the 'Disposition-Notification-To' header when opened. I'd like to set the $MDNSent flag on those (>10000 in a deeply nested directory structure) mails. After having read http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir I wrote a

This was actually the first thing that ChatGPT debugged for me. The issue was that I was able to click on the link when I displayed the raw SVG in the browser (you can use that to test whether the syntax is even correct), but not when the svg displays inside a html page with the <img ...> tag. ChatGPT correctly identified the issue and suggested a solution using <object ...> tags

Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Valeri Galtsev > <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >>> Otherwise it accept junk that your primary rejects >> Not exactly. If greylisting on primary is set, but on backup MX is not, >> still what is killed by greylisting by primary MX, almost never will come >> through backup MX. This is due to the

On Jan 13, 2015, at 8:30 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > so what you want in your OP is just DISCARD in a sieve script and there is no point in "Using Dovecot LMTP it would be more optimal to kick a 5xx back" when the desired result is DISCARD > > why do you want the burden of keep the SMTP session with the client open until the mail is

Hi, a few days ago, we switched our site from pop3 to imap. We are running about 20 users with Netscape 7.0 on a FreeBSD-4.8 Server . I installed dovecot 0.9.99.1 via the freebsd-ports collection, which was as easy as make install and start dovecot. Our users mailboxes are still standart mbox format in /var/mail/(user), as it is default in Freebsd. Now we suffer from a realy ugly problem,