similar to: rpm question

hi, i have new supermicro server (centos5, 2.6.30.9/2.6.27.34/2.6.18-distro kernels, wanpipe 3.5.6) card is: 1 . AFT-A101-SH : SLOT=4 : BUS=8 : IRQ=11 : CPU=A : PORT=1 : HWEC=32 : V=36 and i have this in log irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.30.9rh #1 Call Trace: [<c0465b07>] __report_bad_irq+0x27/0x90

Hi, i need a server for 5000 clients and 50 sources at the same time Can you help me to choose the right server? I was thinking this one PowerEdge R710 n.2 x Intel Xeon E5502 (1,86GHz, cache 4MB, 4,86 GT/s QPI) 2GB Memory for 1CPU (2x1GB Single Rank UDIMMs) 1066MHz 2 X 146GB SAS 15.000rpm 3,5" hd hot-plug PERC 6/i RAID controller 256MB PCIe 2x4 1 gbit network card Thanks --------------

Hi, there! Every once in a while / about once a day I have nouveau for a Quadro NVS 290 failing in my system from about kernel 3.10...up to now 3.14, so I finally decided to report this bug as it gets really annoying. After the bug appears, there are some (one per DATA_ERROR line) small 20x20 to 40x40 pixel sized odd shaped white block artefacts stuck on my (dual monitor) desktop. After a restart

hello, let me explain my problem : i've downloaded centos 3.4 on i386 the md5sum of CD1's iso file is OK i burn it on a CD with NERO and i have this problem in CD1 of centos 3.4 for i386 : ---------------------------- # file perl-5.8.0-88.9.i386.rpm perl-5.8.0-88.9.i386.rpm: RPM v3 bin i386 perl-5.8.0-88.9 # rpm -qlp perl-5.8.0-88.9.i386.rpm erreur: perl-5.8.0-88.9.i386.rpm: signature

Hi people Just switched to Dovecot yesterday, and I've already got about five reports of users with duplicate mail in their inbox :-/. Not as bad as lost email, mind you, but pretty annoying still. Checking the server log, it says: postfix/smtpd: disconnect from unknown deliver: msync() failed with index file maildir/dovecot.index: Input/output error unionfs: new lower inode mtime

>From today's maillog: maillog:Dec 28 09:29:40 aurora dovecot: IMAP(doug): msync() failed with index file /home/doug/Maildir/.projects.job591/dovecot.index: Invalid argument maillog:Dec 28 09:30:21 aurora dovecot: IMAP(doug): msync() failed with index file /home/doug/Maildir/dovecot.index: Invalid argument maillog:Dec 28 09:30:22 aurora dovecot: IMAP(doug): msync() failed with index file

Dear All, My apologies for asking my question on less appropriate list. I did ask it on centos-mirror at centos.org, but that list is really low traffic (and slow response probably - I only got acknowledgement of my post...). On the other hand, I'm sure there are many public mirror maintainers on this list who may help me with my trouble. Upon replacing faulty machine hosting public mirrors

Hi, I'm using py-rrdtool 0.2.1 with rrdtool 1.3.0 under 7.0-STABLE, and there's a couple of things about this new version of rrdtool that hurt performance under FreeBSD, but apparently help on whatever they tested on. For every update, the database file is opened, mapped into memory, madvise() is called, contents are modified, msync() is called, and the file is unmapped and closed:

Hi, HP says that what they call "NUMA split mode" should be disabled in the BIOS of the Z800 workstation when running Linux. They are reasoning that Linux kernels do not support this feature and even might not boot if it?s enabled. Since it apparently was years ago since they made this statement, I?m wondering if I should still leave this feature disabled or not. More recent kernels

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-04:11.msync Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: buffer cache invalidation implementation issues Category: core Module: sys Announced:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-04:11.msync Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: buffer cache invalidation implementation issues Category: core Module: sys Announced:

Sorry if this is a dup. I sent right before I subscribed to the list, so I'm not sure if it made it. I have just taken over a redhat system with Samba 3.0.0 configured with security = user, and domain logins enabled. I've included the smb.conf at the end of this message. I would like to upgrade to 3.0.10 for a numbers of reasons, one being security and one being that password changes

The memory relating guest domain should be allocated from NUMA node on which the guest runs. Because the latency of the same NUMA node is faster than that of a different one. This patch fixes memory allocation for Address Translation Structure of VT-d. VT-d uses two types of Structures for DMA address translation. The one is Device Assignment Structure. The other is Address Translation

On 10/1/2017 8:38 AM, hw wrote: > HP says that what they call "NUMA split mode" should be disabled in the > BIOS of the Z800 workstation when running Linux. They are reasoning > that Linux kernels do not support this feature and even might not boot > if it?s enabled. hmm, that workstation is a dual Xeon 56xx (Westmere-EP, derived from Nehalem), new in 2010 > Since it

Dear All, I am considering to buy a workstation. For the CPUs, I wonder whether anybody have the experience in choosing one for the R. Intel Xeon W3540 2.93 8MB/1066 QC CPU is much cheaper as compared with the Intel Xeon E5540 2.53 8MB/1066 QC CPU. However, its Hz 2.93 is bigger than 2.53. I wonder which one would run R quicker. Thank you. Huang [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

# lspci -nn 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 5520 I/O Hub to ESI Port [8086:3406] (rev 22) 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub PCI Express Root Port 1 [8086:3408] (rev 22) 00:03.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub PCI Express Root Port 3 [8086:340a] (rev 22) 00:05.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 5520/X58 I/O Hub PCI

On 7/28/2016 3:41 PM, Fawzy Ibrahim wrote: > LSI SATA MEGARAID 95Q9 afaik, the megaraid cards are mostly all SAS, which support SATA drives, except very old ones were SCSI. Ok, I do see they had a series of MegaRAID SATA 150-xx and 300-xx cards, these were 64 bit PCI or PCI-X cards. 95Q9 does not appear to be a valid card number, 9240, 9260, 9280 are some pci-express SAS MegaRaid

On Oct 21, 2011, at 12:15 AM, James Molloy wrote: > Hi Andy, > > Could you describe how this would be done? In the current ARM itineraries > (say C-A9 for example), the superscalar issue stage is modelled as taking 1 > cycle. If it were to take 2 cycles instead, as far as I can tell the hazard > analyser would stall because both FU's would be acquired. > > I would

John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> writes: > On 10/1/2017 8:38 AM, hw wrote: >> HP says that what they call "NUMA split mode" should be disabled in the >> BIOS of the Z800 workstation when running Linux. They are reasoning >> that Linux kernels do not support this feature and even might not boot >> if it?s enabled. > > hmm, that workstation is

On 7/30/2016 6:56 AM, Fawzy Ibrhim wrote: > # lspci -nn > 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 5520 I/O Hub to ESI Port [8086:3406] (rev 22) > 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub PCI Express Root Port 1 [8086:3408] (rev 22) > 00:03.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub PCI Express Root Port 3 [8086:340a] (rev 22) >