similar to: permission issue when moving / copying a message

it is, I'm coming I do not understand the need to recreate and validate the file keyset-en ....... I then recreate a good record with the key in this file and my past signatures are good. I did not understand correctly the operation of dlv keyset files and I recreated downgrade bind to the stable version 9.3 of CentOS 5.5 and using webmin. can you give me the command to use to create files

rehello centos list after some modifications rpm fedora core 14 of bind-9.7.3 and patching. diff -u unpatched/configure.in patched/configure.in --- unpatched/configure.in 2010-07-05 14:02:20.000000000 +0200 +++ patched/configure.in 2010-07-05 14:03:48.000000000 +0200 @@ -282,7 +282,8 @@ AC_C_INLINE AC_C_VOLATILE AC_CHECK_FUNC(sysctlbyname, AC_DEFINE(HAVE_SYSCTLBYNAME))

hello all the people I'd call http://people.redhat.com/ atkac ~ / official member of the team redhat for news of future versions of bind 9.7 for el5 sincerely -- gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:

hello list centos. I installed the packages libp11 and engine_pkcs11 of fedora core 14 on my centos 5.5 to allow me to compile the latest version of bind. this is the only way I found to compile bind 9.7.3. you know another way to compile bind 9.7.3 on centos 5.5 thanks for all your return -- gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7

hello centos list I recompile the source rpm fedora core 14 on my centos 5.5. I wrote a post on my blog to explain how I did. goo.gl/p0sqF I also recompile the rpm via koji to epel 6 and the result is possitive goo.gl/OQwIX package is on it safe sincerely -- gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key 092164A7 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x092164A7 -------------- next

hello centos list hello guys hello master of Fu I want to know the different changes to be applied in the config bind97 because I use dnssec and differences may be present. I do not know they are the differences that may exist between centos 5.7 and bind to bind to centos 6.2 I want to know the small differences that may be present in the config bind in the concerns of my desire to perform

hello guys hello centos list hello master of "Fu" I write following the announcement on twitter Port centos 6.3 on ppc. what about the port on ppc64 and PS3 later old school sincerely -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC2626742 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key C2626742 http://urlshort.eu fakessh @ http://gplus.to/sshfake

upgrade question is it possible to imagine during an upgrade from centos 5 to 6 to keep the named directory /etc and /var unchanged if an update as simple as possible. can this be -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC2626742 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key C2626742 http://urlshort.eu fakessh @ http://gplus.to/sshfake http://gplus.to/sshswilting

hu guys I regularly read this list I can usually find me in the excellent documentation apache. I'm in front of a very strange problem I possess two desktop machines which works with the Apache server with centos 6 1 of 2 machines starts and not the other. I use the apache config file here that provides standard distribution any help for me sincerely --

hello centos list hello guys hello master of "Fu" how to create a rpm package for centos 5 with an archive tar.xz. I possess a source rpm of gnutls http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/gnutls-2.12.16-1.el5.src.rpm and I would try to compile the latest version of gnutls What is the correct procedure to build an rpm with this type of package tar.xz sincerely --

hello centos guru I encounter a problem with centos 6 perl -MCPAN -e shell install MyModule well I installed the module but in the standard repertoire of the user but not in the directory of the perl distribution how to remedy this problem cpan modules installed in /usr/lib/perl/ please help me I can not solve this problem alone sincerely --

hello guys I encounter a problem with the package mailman and forwarding ssl my precedent conversation to this problem http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users at python.org/msg61411.html mark sapiro was thinking of a httpd problem I call the centos community to provide help me to rewrite the url for this to work. thanks -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC2626742

hi folks hi timo , is a good day for you I use a double deliverance root and user i use lda deliver dovecot authentification and since the switch to 2.0.4 I encounter the problem that the box Maildir root for the name of the INBOX after passing sieve is the type root at nsXXXX.ovh.net how to correct the problem Timo your lights --

hi folks hi timo hi master of "Fu" I just migrate my emails from one type of Maildir to Mailbox I did as I was having problems reading speed with my webmail. I did it in order to optimize when do you my current config work for me sincerely -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC2626742 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key C2626742 http://urlshort.eu

Hi Timo in the present work would be possible to walk to another folder for deleted_to_trash please answer me -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC2626742 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key C2626742 http://about.me/fakessh http://urlshort.eu fakessh @ http://gplus.to/sshfake http://gplus.to/sshswilting http://gplus.to/john.swilting

hello timo and other dev after a precise reading of plugin deleted to trash it appears to me like things more varariables are declared NULL in the code. it appears to me as being possible to achieve actions even if messages with the same id appears several times in different INBOX when it is the exact order of things -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC2626742 gpg

hi guys hi master of "Fu" any information for dovecot update on centos 5 I am looking for information on the people running release 2.1.0 and 2.1.1 of dovecot I edited rpms sources here. http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/dovecot-2.1.0-2.centme.el5.src.rpm http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/dovecot-2.1.1-2.centme.el5.src.rpm compilation goes well but after installation and restart the services I

hello dovecot network hello Timo I've just upgraded to 2.0.8 dovecot and I wonder it should be good value of vsz_limit I put value as 64 M but I do not know if it's good value return are welcome sincerely and happy new year this my dovecot -n ~]# /usr/sbin/dovecot -n # 2.0.8: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32.2-xxxx-grs-ipv6-32 i686 CentOS release 5.5 (Final)

Hi Timo and the other directors of the following pigeonhole dovecot sieve I wonder what are the strengths and weaknesses of my config, and what do I need to change to stick more to a best configuration r13151 ~]# /usr/sbin/dovecot -n # 2.0.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32.2-xxxx-grs-ipv6-32 i686 CentOS release 5.5 (Final) auth_mechanisms = plain login base_dir =

Hi, After a successful upgrade CentOS 3.8 i386 to CentOS 4.4 x86_64 and, after cleaning old 3.8 packages, yum does not update the x86_64 packages but just the i386's. The rhn-applet see the x86_64 updates but neither yum nor up2date see them. When I run: # yum -d 3 check-update Yum Version: 2.4.3 COMMAND: yum -d 3 Installroot: / Setting up repositories Baseurl(s) for repo: