similar to: /var/run/dovecot mode 750 too tight

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.8.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.8.tar.gz.sig This is mainly to fix the 0777 base_dir creation issue, which could be considered a security hole, exploitable by local users. An attacker could for example replace Dovecot's auth socket and log in as other users. Gaining root privileges isn't possible though. This affects only

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.8.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/dovecot-1.2.8.tar.gz.sig This is mainly to fix the 0777 base_dir creation issue, which could be considered a security hole, exploitable by local users. An attacker could for example replace Dovecot's auth socket and log in as other users. Gaining root privileges isn't possible though. This affects only

I *really* dislike the new photon UI. I WANT the arrow buttons top and bottom of the scrollbars. Does anyone know how to bring them back, or is that "that's *sooo* last year, you can't ever have them again"? mark

I put iptables on my asterisk box and an odd thing occurs. I allow 5060 and 10000-20000. As soon as I start iptables and make a call it literally takes 60-90 seconds before the call even starts to ring. As soon as I shut iptables off, the call goes through immediately again. Its quite odd. The call does eventually go through and talks fine but it takes sooo long to connect. Anyone have some

I'm unable to get dovecot-lda with sieve filtering to deliver into maildir folders. The examples on the wiki explicitly say "mbox", so I'm wondering, does the dovecot-lda sieve implementation not support filtering into maildir folders? -frank

maybe this is a silly question ;-) But why is it possible to login on a machine with a locked account (passwd -l ) via pubkey-authentication (authorized_keys) ? I use OpenSSH3.01p1on Solaris8 with PAM support so I thought this should not happen. If this is the normal behaviour and built in intentionally what would be the easiest way to lock an account without deleting the users authorized_keys ?

Hi, I followed the "Optimizing CentOS for gigabit firewall" posting and as some posters wrote pf is soo sooo ssooooo mutch faster, I was thinking to give it a try. But I'm not familier to BSD so I was looking for some tools and found "pfsense" http://www.pfsense.org/ "pfSense is a free, open source customized distribution of FreeBSD tailored for use as a

Can shared/public namespaces' prefixes have a common prefix? :) namespace public { separator = / prefix = zz/shared/ location = maildir:/var/maildir/shared:INDEX=/var/maildir/%n/shared subscriptions = no } # to share other employees mailboxes (term'd or admin access) namespace shared { separator = / prefix = zz/shared/%%u/ location =

We have a product where our customer is "allowed" to make minor changes to the .rhtml views. Obviously, this can be an issue when updating the software, as changes need to be merged in. Also, sometimes the customer wants to back out there change but no longer has the original file. SOOO.... I''d like to tell them - if you want to change a .rhtml file - just copy it to

I have been attempting to replace Procmail with Dovecot as the LDA for my Postfix mail server, but without success. Below is a truncated output from the /var/log/maillog. Aug 9 11:56:20 scorpio postfix/local[4338]: 88C3FC3D1: to=<gerard at localhost.seibercom.net>, orig_to=<gerard at localhost>, relay=local, delay=1119, delays=1118/0.71/0/0.11, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary

> Tilghman Lesher wrote: >> On Sunday 18 January 2004 12:01, Adthrawn wrote: >> >>> Spell out RAID - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks. Bingo. >> >> >> That's "Independent Disks". It's the independence of each spindle >> that >> is valued, not the cost proposition. If one spindle goes, it's not >> all >>

Hу здpаcте shorewall-users, can i make subj with shorewall? i enabled iproute2 (i have dial-up and LAN) for some machine behind NAT. NAT network is 10.33.20.0/24 and ppp0 ip is given dynamicly sooo... for me to make machine with 10.33.20.10 ip to go throught new gate with given addres i need to perform subj (or so i think :-)). PS: i''m not a constant subscriber...

Hi! Sorry, that was meant indeed for program execution (to open/run the program), not downloading. The term used was wrong ;( , I'm not sooo good in English and computer language ;). Can you please tell me how to run the program? After downloading it saves to my folder, but then I don't know what to do - what program to choose or what to write in the terminal (console). Thanks so much

The problem is that gem can only find win32-api v 1.2.0 $ gem install win32-api Building native extensions. This could take a while... Successfully installed win32-api-1.2.0 1 gem installed Installing ri documentation for win32-api-1.2.0... Installing RDoc documentation for win32-api-1.2.0... Sooo... where/how do I get 1.2.1? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Alice Wonder wrote: > On 1/4/19 8:28 AM, mark wrote: > >> I *really* dislike the new photon UI. I WANT the arrow buttons top and >> bottom of the scrollbars. >> >> Does anyone know how to bring them back, or is that "that's *sooo* last >> year, you can't ever have them again"? >> > Switch to Mate and they are there. I used to like

# portmaster mail/dovecot-sieve ===>>> The dependency for mail/dovecot seems to be handled by dovecot2-2.2.22 ===>>> Initial dependency check complete for mail/dovecot-sieve ===>>> Starting build for mail/dovecot-sieve <<<=== ===>>> All dependencies are up to date ===> Cleaning for dovecot-sieve-1.2+0.1.19_2 ===>>> Waiting on

Dear all, i performed a clusteranalysis - which worked so far... i plotted the dendrogram and sooo many branches, a rough sketch would be enough ;) i tried max.levels therefore which worked, but not for the plot... i used the following plot(hcd,nodePar =nP, str(hcd,max.level=1)) the output on the terminal was: --[dendrogram w/ 2 branches and 196 members at h = 2.70] |--[dendrogram w/ 2

Hi, I used to look forward to Samba's warning free compilations, but this is to be no more. I've got samba 2.2.2 installed and running with --without-winbind, but it seems that this is a good thing to have. Sooo... Has anyone successfully compiled winbind on Solaris 8 using cc? I'm using cc (cc: Sun WorkShop 6 update 1 C 5.2 2000/09/11) and am running into the same compile