similar to: FTBFS with binutils-gold

Hi, i'm trying to configure my postfix to use dovecot SASL instead of saslauthd with rimap to authenticate my users. I've modified my postfix/dovecot configuration as is described on http://wiki.dovecot.org/PostfixAndDovecotSASL but when an user try to login it fails with the following log (debug_auth = on): Dec 12 15:07:53 lorien dovecot: auth(default): client in:

I've made two little patches to allow dovecot to be compiled on GNU/Hurd. Could you review them? Kind regards, Marco Nenciarini -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- | Marco Nenciarini | Debian/GNU Linux Developer - Plug Member | | mnencia at prato.linux.it | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia |

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.53 Severity: minor On my mailserver i've got some message like the following (user infos obscured): Jan 21 08:01:01 lorien postfix/smtp[3005]: 39D2315533A: to=<someuser at somedomain.org>, relay=mail.somedomain.org[11.22.33.44]:25, conn_use=2, delay=1.3, delays=0.06/0/0.44/0.83, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 Message queued) This is a normal

Package: logcheck-database Followup-For: Bug #407642 I've found another litle error in dovecot POP3 rules. The line ^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ dovecot: POP3\([-_.@[:alnum:]]+\): Disconnected: Logged out top=[[:digit:]]+/[[:digit:]]+, retr=[[:digit:]]+/[[:digit:]]+, del=[[:digit:]]+/[[:digit:]]+, size=[[:digit:]]+$ must be similar to the following IMAP one (on my system

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.53 Severity: normal Tags: patch Accordingly with dovecot source src/login-common/client-common.c arround line 52 dovecot reports local connections with word "secured" at the same place where it insert the word TLS for encrypted connections. On my dovecot + squirrelmail system all connections are originating from local ip, so all message are

This is the trace (gdb) run Starting program: /root/tmp/dovecot-1.0.rc7/src/imap/imap x select inbox Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. mail_index_write_base_header (index=0x80e2a28, hdr=0xaff66028) at mail-index.c:1313 1313 memcpy(index->map->mmap_base, hdr, hdr_size); (gdb) bt #0 mail_index_write_base_header (index=0x80e2a28, hdr=0xaff66028) at

package dovecot-common forward 570764 dovecot at dovecot.org thanks Martin Schwenke ha scritto: > Package: dovecot-common > Version: 1:1.2.10-1 > Severity: normal > > > I attempt to compile the following sieve script... > > martins at bilbo:~/tmp$ cat test.sieve > if address :is "Return-path" "owner-cipe-l at inka.de" { > keep; > } >

I''m testing how xen and grub2 can work together. I''m using xen 3.4.2 and grub2 1.97+20091115-1 from debian sid. After many failed attempts I''ve discovered that on my system the first argument that grub2 should pass to the linux kernel is lost. This is my working grub2 configuration: menuentry "Xen 3.4.0 / Debian GNU/Linux, Linux 2.6.31-1-xen-amd64" {

I''m testing how xen and grub2 can work together. I''m using xen 3.4.2 and grub2 1.97+20091115-1 from debian sid. After many failed attempts I''ve discovered that on my system the first argument that grub2 should pass to the linux kernel is lost. This is my working grub2 configuration: menuentry "Xen 3.4.0 / Debian GNU/Linux, Linux 2.6.31-1-xen-amd64" {

Hello! In an attempt to finally get a recent Xen dom0 kernel booted on this pesky amd64 system (see <http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2009-10/msg00485.html> for the (short) story), I wanted to give this one one a try: Marco Nenciarini <mnencia at prato.linux.it> wrote: > I've applied latest forward ported patches from > >

Source: xen-3 Version: 3.4.0-2 Severity: minor User: peter.fritzsche at gmx.de Usertags: no-add-needed Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building your executables. More informations can be found at

I have been running Dovecot 1.2.5 since Sept 14. Beginning at about 03:28 on Sept 21 for no apparent (to me) reason and continuing through the present, I am seeing log messages like the following and am experiencing delays logging in. Sep 22 19:07:15 sbh16 dovecot: dovecot: Temporary failure in creating login processes, slowing down for now Sep 22 19:07:15 sbh16 dovecot: pop3-login: Fatal:

Hi, this is sort of off topic but I'm using dovecot with postfix on centos 5 and I have multiple virtual domains and I want to be able to have virtual admin's add/remove mappings/users for their own domains. I have looked around and haven't found many solutions just wondering what everyone is using for virtual mail management. TIA, Paul

'afternoon list! I use mysql as userdb, which contains two type of password schemes: DES and MD5-CRYPT. I read there : http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/PasswordSchemes that both are supported by dovecot. Unfortunately, dovecot keeps saying: Not a valid MD5-CRYPT or PLAIN-MD5 password when looking for a user with DES encrypted password. Is dovecot able to recognize password

Hi all, Speaking of Debian, what relative position are the Debian Unstable (Sid) packages in to the latest "Bleeding edge" builds of RCS-based releases from the Wiki? If using Unstable is it recommended to stay or use the newer ones? I'd say it was production, yes, but I'm forgiving of problems in the latest releases, so long as they aren't meant to be beta (i.e., known

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.4.2-3 Severity: minor Hi, I've just noticed that the xen-utils-common package instals the file xen-backend.rules both under /etc/udev/xen-backend.rules and /lib/udev/rules.d/xen-backend.rules I think the flormer is useless and is installed there by mistake. Kind Regards, Marco -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable

This patch contains the XFS support code from grub-0.97 ported to libfsimage. I''ve already sent this patch on this list six month ago, but it was rejected because of the freeze. Attached you can find the patch against the xen-unstable tip. I''ve got many success reports from users, two of which from this list. Regards, Marco -- Marco Nenciarini - System manager @ Devise.IT

Package: xen-3.0 Version: 3.0.4-1-1 Severity: important Hi, Your package is trying to build 32 bit binaries on amd64, and fails with the following error: /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:27: error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file or directory If you want to build 32 bit binaries on 64 bit arches, you need to build depend on gcc-multilib on those arches. Kurt

Package: xen-3 Version: 3.2.1-2 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... fakeroot debian/rules clean if [ -f debian/control ] && [ -f debian/control.md5sum ] && [ -f debian/rules.gen ]; then \ if md5sum debian/changelog

Package: xen-3.0 Version: 3.0.2+hg9681-1 Your package fails to build with GCC 4.2. Version 4.2 has not been released yet but I'm building with a snapshot in order to find errors and give people an advance warning. The bug below is in your package though and not because I'm using a snapshot of the compiler so please take a look at it. You can reproduce this with the gcc-snapshot