similar to: Replace message headers

static void setXXX(MachineInstr &MI, ...) { for (MachineOperand &MO : MI.operands()) { if (MO.isRegMask()) MO.setRegMask(...); } } > On May 27, 2016, at 7:02 PM, vivek pandya via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Matthias Braun <matze at braunis.de <mailto:matze at braunis.de>> wrote: >

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Matthias Braun <matze at braunis.de> wrote: > > On May 27, 2016, at 6:55 PM, vivek pandya via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:23 AM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Mehdi Amini

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Matthias Braun <matze at braunis.de> wrote: > static void setXXX(MachineInstr &MI, ...) { > for (MachineOperand &MO : MI.operands()) { > if (MO.isRegMask()) > MO.setRegMask(...); > } > } > > Ok this is what Mehdi Amini suggested. I will do that, but just to note this will add method to MO so this change is not completely

> On May 27, 2016, at 6:55 PM, vivek pandya via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:23 AM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com <mailto:vivekvpandya at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote:

Sent from my iPhone > On May 27, 2016, at 7:02 PM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Matthias Braun <matze at braunis.de> wrote: >> >>> On May 27, 2016, at 6:55 PM, vivek pandya via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On

So what is the status about LiveVariables. Is there a plan to remove it? After searching in old lvm-dev-mails it is mentioned that LiveVariable still exists due to one pass needing it. And a comment in TargetPassConfig.cpp indicates that the pass in question is TwoAddressInstruction: // FIXME: Once TwoAddressInstruction pass no longer uses kill flags, // LiveVariables can be removed

Hi, on my small Xen-virtualised server with 48 MiB RAM I use Postfix and Dovecot, because the Debian administrators dislike qmail [1], which is in my opinion despite some maintainability and code quality issues a quite well designed software, because it mostly follows the UNIX principles. Postfix is not able to sort my E-Mail into different Maildir folders and after I looked at procmail's

Where is the liveness analysis pass? I have been looking for days but cannot find anything. I just want to know transfer variables in and out of basic blocks, that are calculated using simple data flow equations. Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180920/529bce15/attachment.html>

> On May 24, 2016, at 10:08 PM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: > >> On May 24, 2016, at 9:17 PM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com <mailto:vivekvpandya at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Dear

Sent from my iPhone > On May 24, 2016, at 11:04 PM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> On May 24, 2016, at 10:08 PM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 25,

Hi, I'm currently building an initrd for CRUX which will use klibc. But I don't want to install klibc to /usr, I just want to install the shared klibc and its header files to $DEST, build some utils against, link them dynamically and include both in the initramfs image. What's the best way to do this? Regards Matthias-Christian

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mehdi Amini" <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > To: "vivek pandya" <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> > Cc: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, "llvm-dev" > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "Matthias Braun" <matze at braunis.de>, > "Quentin Colombet" <qcolombet at

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"vivek pandya" <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> > *To: *"Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > *Cc: *"llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "Matthias Braun" < > matze at braunis.de>, "Mehdi

> On May 24, 2016, at 9:17 PM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear Mentors, > > Please help me to understand our plan to implement Interprocedural Register allocator by propogating register usage info. While writing this mail I am considering all previous discussion over llvm-dev and IRC. > > 1) A MachineFunction pass to be executed POST-RA to

Hello! My Name is Jan Matthias and I am from Cologne University in Germany. I have= problems with R , version 1.9.1. I also use the package tcltk and follow the instructions from a command fil= e which i will send with. My problem is that the program always stops at the same step, showing diffe= rent Error Messages sometimes. My Hope is that you have a suggestion what t= he problem is and how

> On Sep 23, 2016, at 1:01 PM, Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > I have posted a patch that switches the API to one that supports this (yet non-existent functionality) earlier: >

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On May 24, 2016, at 9:17 PM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear Mentors, > > Please help me to understand our plan to implement Interprocedural > Register allocator by propogating register usage info. While writing this > mail I am considering all previous

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On May 24, 2016, at 10:08 PM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > wrote: > >> >> On May 24, 2016, at 9:17 PM, vivek pandya <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:53 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"vivek pandya" <vivekvpandya at gmail.com> > *To: *"Quentin Colombet" <qcolombet at apple.com> > *Cc: *"Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, >

Dear Mentors, Please help me to understand our plan to implement Interprocedural Register allocator by propogating register usage info. While writing this mail I am considering all previous discussion over llvm-dev and IRC. 1) A MachineFunction pass to be executed POST-RA to collect the information about the used Registers. 2) An Immutable pass which will store reg usage info collected by