similar to: Multiple postfix + single dovecot - optimal configuration

I'm sorry for messing up postfix and dovecot in the title, I have a good lack of sleep today. ^_^ 16 ????? 2014 ?. 6:09 ???????????? "Nikolay Amiantov" <nikoamia at gmail.com> ???????: > Hello, > I've got a segfault with postfix2-antispam. > Versions: > Linux: Arch Linux x86_64 > Dovecot: 2.2.11 > Antispam: latest hg (revision 51) > > Antispam

Hi, the networking just drives me crazy and it seems that i am missing something. So here is my situation: i have a server with 2 public IPs (85.214.1.230 and 81.169.1.81) the dom0 is on: ip 81.169.1.81 netmask 255.255.255.255 gw 81.169.1.1 i would like to have a domU with ip 85.214.1.230. I tried everything routing, bridging.. nothing seems to work. my dom0 config; . (network-script

Hello, I've got a segfault with postfix2-antispam. Versions: Linux: Arch Linux x86_64 Dovecot: 2.2.11 Antispam: latest hg (revision 51) Antispam configuration: antispam_backend = dspam antispam_allow_append_to_spam = YES antispam_spam = Spam;Junk antispam_trash = trash;Trash antispam_signature = X-DSPAM-Signature antispam_signature_missing = error antispam_dspam_binary =

Hi All, I’ve got a question about Module::getOrInsertFunction(). I got an impression that it is not deterministic where exactly in the bit code module the new function will be inserted. Is there a way to make it deterministic by explicitly specifying some offset at which the function should be inserted? Please correct me if I’m wrong. Thank you very much in advance for help, Best regards, Tomek

On 05/29/2014 11:06 AM, Tim Northover wrote: > Hi Tomek, > >> I’ve got a question about Module::getOrInsertFunction(). >> I got an impression that it is not deterministic where exactly in the bit >> code module the new function will be inserted. > Looking at the code (not exhaustively), it seems a new function will > always be added to the end of a module. > >

hi, i''ve run into somewhat of a snag with my puppet instances: when i try to have puppet install a port via portupgrade, it seems to step up each version in ports to the latest, if there are multiple versions. i''ve run into this with two ports so far: vim and postfix. my package line is: package { postfix: ensure => latest } i am however able to specify the version

Hello, I have 8 Samba servers with 300 clients here running on Sun and Linux machines with GREAT performance. Now in one departement i installed samba 2.0.6 on one 40K$ IBM F50 with AIX 4.3.2, 2xCPU, 256MB RAM, 100FDX, extern RAID 5 Tower . Performance is really very, very BAD. I tried already everything, but this IBM box with samba is just very SLOW. Browsing through directories, logging, copying

Hi Philip, I would like to ask a follow-up question about code generation. Do you know if is expected that if we take the same bit code modules and link them together in the same order (programatically), but on different machines (assuming the same version of LLVM and roughly the same OS), the output may differ with respect to order of function definitions inside module? Thank you very much in

Hi Philip, Thank you very much for your comments. I think I’ve discovered a root cause. The problem was in linking bit code archive files with the module. At some point, std::set<Module*> is used and iterated over. I believe this was the reason why e.g. It worked consistently with ASLR turned off and produced non-deterministic output otherwise. I changed that bit to use vector instead and

Hello, If you don?t want (Who wants ?) to save roaming profiles under Winnt\Profiles, than you have to change, or create (if not exist) a registry string: Run regedt32.exe and locate the key entry: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Microsoft\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon Add (or change) the following string: DeleteRoamingCache Standard value is 0, it has to be 1 All the Best. --

Someone who have mailbox in different directory than indexes, can confirm if doveadm can recreate index (after deleting dovecot.index* files) or these files can be created only by connecting with IMAP client? ?r., 4 gru 2019 o 15:45 Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> napisa?(a): > > > > On 4 Dec 2019, at 11.48, Tomek Lutelmowski via dovecot < > dovecot at

Return-Path: <viuwier@wp.pl> X-Original-To: shorewall-announce@lists.shorewall.net Delivered-To: shorewall-announce@lists.shorewall.net Received: from smtp.wp.pl (smtp.wp.pl [212.77.101.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.shorewall.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D8F33DB3 for

Bug in Mailman version 2.1.5 We're sorry, we hit a bug! If you would like to help us identify the problem, please email a copy of this page to the webmaster for this site with a description of what happened. Thanks! Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/var/mailman/scripts/driver", line 87, in run_main main() File

Neither of dovecot.index files are created (.cache, .log, .thread) - these files are created when I open the folder with IMAP client. When mailbox is not used for long time, the indexing takes very long time. So I'm looking for any solution (preferably with doveadm) to manually reindex folders in background. wt., 3 gru 2019 o 20:23 Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> napisa?(a):

I was wondering, if it's possible to set up Samba as a sort of a domain controller for Linux workstations? I'm thinking of benefits like roaming profiles, managing printers etc. Or perhaps for Linux there are better choices than Samba, when it comes to the office / school use (many users, many classrooms, many workstations etc.)? -- Tomek http://wpkg.org

Hello, This post is similar to what I posted yesterday '"smbclient -L host" to list IP addresses - possible?'. I have a PDC in one place and many workstations in different other places connected using WAN/VPN. These workstations have rather changing IPs assigned by DHCP. Sometimes I need to connect to these machines using VNC, for example, connect to machine AC-PC001 to

Hi, I want to perform goodness of fit test for multinominal distribution. The easiest way would be to use Chi2, but the measurment errors are not normally distributed. I thought about using some bootstraping method to perform the analysis. How can I do it in R? Tomek -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read

Hello Everyone! I just want to make sure if such a mess could work for sip channel: In sip.conf: ; register => <some_md5_checksum>@host ; ; [host] hostname=some_address auth=md5 Greets Tomek -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050208/169311c6/attachment.htm

Dear R developers and users! I have calculated metric MDS by cmdscale from matrix of distances (dissimilarities). I would like to ask you how can I estimate how well this new mapping represents characteristic features of my data set? Thank you for any suggestions. Best, tomek

Hi Tim, Thank you very much for quick response. What happens in my case is that mixing calls to getOrInsertFunction with linking another bit code module to the current module seems to be sometimes producing different outputs. Difference might be with the ordering of functions in the file (I¹m looking at LLVM IR representation), with numbers used for constant variables, numbers used in the ³dbg²