similar to: Feature request: 'dovecot-shared' files to be configurable

Hi folks, i'm using 3.0.30 on Debian etch, one big share (~250 G) with a separate recycler, built with the vfs object. Files which are deleted are moved to that recycler, now my question: Are files that are copied/moved to another share also moved to the recycler? Thanks in advance, i.A. Hendrik Pahl Systemingenieur -- LWsystems GmbH & Co. KG ++ http://www.lw-systems.de/impressum

hi everybody, got a strange issue with 1.2.4 on SLES11. When listing the user's available subscriptions with any client, every shared mailbox that can be subscribed is listed twice, once with it's correct name, 'folder' for example. the second appereance is without the last letter of the name, 'folde' for example. strange behaviour, since this happens with any client. i

Hello List, We've upgraded our Dovecot system from 1.2.4 to 2.0.12. If someone now accesses an inbox of another user at the shared namespace, the folder will be shown as: shared/martin/INBOX The 1.2 installation has shown the folder like shared/martin Is it possible to achieve the "old" behavior? ** Configuration of the namespaces * dovecot 1.2 namespace private

hi! i just have samba running with ldap backend for user authentication. and my problem is that i can access my samba shares but with the wrong user but i am in the right group Domain Users And i dont know where to start searching. I could post the logs in pastebin for example but you should tell me what log level to use ... Thanx, Daniel

Hi, is it possible to compile dovecot 1.2.5 with the managesieve patch 0.11.9 which is for dovecot 1.2.4 or is it better to wait if a new managesieve patch is released? Maybe 1.2.5 will work too? Thanks, Seba

On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Roman Levenstein wrote: >>> Wouldn't it be possible and even more clean to have just one >>> description like (I use a pseudo-description here): >>> >>> def MOVrr : I<0x88, MRMDestReg, (ops (GR8|GR16|GR32) :$dst, >>> (i8mem|i16mem|i32mem):$src), >>> "mov{b} {$src, $dst|$dst, $src}", []>,

Hi Chris, Thanks a lot for your answer! Chris Lattner wrote: >> 1. Why does X86 instruction set description provide different >> descriptions for the same instructions, which differ only in the size >> of operands? >> E.g. >> >> def MOV8rm : I<0x8A, MRMSrcMem, (ops GR8 :$dst, i8mem :$src), >> "mov{b} {$src, $dst|$dst, $src}",

Hy Samba users, I've got a problem with an samba/ldap setup. As I set an ACL to a domain group in an windows client, a group mapping entry will be created in the Idmap ou at the ldap server. I discoverd the OpenLDAP logfiles. There, the server sends a search request for the domain group sid to the ldap backend will retreive an entry back: Jan 15 20:19:24 225 slapd[4518]: conn=190 op=24

Hi list members, I've a problem with a printer in a samba network like the following client ----> samba dc ----> cups ----> network plotter Client: Windows XP Professional Samba: 3.0.20b on SLES 9, SP3 Cups: 1.1.20 Printer: HP DesignJet 1050C The plotter is installed as a windows network printer on the samba server. Cups is directly connected to samba:

i want to extend a burg-style code generator generator to write a retargetable compiler, implementing the algorithm: Rainer Leupers: Code Selection for Media Processors with SIMD Instructions. DATE 2000: 4-8 what i have now is only iburg, though robust but with very limited functionality. i have consider using "nova" - http://cocom.sourceforge.net/nona.html but it seems not be

On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Roman Levenstein wrote: > I'm trying to implement a new backend for an embedded CISC processor. > Therefore I thought that it makes sense to take X86 target as a basis, > to save some time. Ok. Note that the X86 backend is one of the most complex though, because it supports several subtargets and ABIs, which makes it more complex than some other targets. >

Hi, I'm trying to implement a new backend for an embedded CISC processor. Therefore I thought that it makes sense to take X86 target as a basis, to save some time. But when I look into the X86InstrInfo.td, I have a very strong feeling that it is one of the most complex instruction set descriptions compared to other targets. I can imagine that this is due to the complexity of X86's

Thank you to Rowland, L.P.H. van Belle, the entire samba team, and others that help. I've been running samba in our fire department for over a year. I'm running a self compiled samba version 4.11.9, bind version 9.11.3, BIND9_DLZ, isc-dhcp-server version 4.3.5 with fail over (between the 2 DC's) on Ubuntu 18.04 on Odroid N2 aarch64. I have 2 identical DC's on the network FDDC10

Hi all, i have an * version: Asterisk SVN-branch-1.2-r45691, I need to register a linksys 922 phone thru internet and when I make sip debug command i see this debug information: -- SIP read from x.x.x.x:1024: REGISTER sip:mysipserver.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP x.x.x.x:1025;branch=z9hG4bK-839856dc From: "SPA922" <sip:5403@mysipserver.com>;tag=685bbad1fae3325do0 To:

Installation was OK and all works well, but this warning is bad :-/ tried 15 min to find the failure (there is no failure) ... $ perl Makefile.PL XAPIAN_CONFIG=/root/build/xapian-core/bin/xapian-config PREFIX=/root/build/Search-Xapian Checking if your kit is complete... Looks good 'XAPIAN_CONFIG' is not a known MakeMaker parameter name. Writing Makefile for Search::Xapian $ perl

I have a CentOS 4.3 box that is giving me some serious problem. During the "yum update" from 4.2 -> 4.3 I lost my connection (okay, I accidentally closed the window). I logged back on and did another yum update, and it appeared as though things completed properly. Everything is working fine, up until one of my hosting clients noted that he is now unable to use ftp to update his web

Dear R-community, not to re-invent the wheel I wonder if someone of you has ever written a function to compute the GHK smooth recursive simulator to estimate multivariate normal probabilities. See for instance page 194 of @BOOK{Greene97, author = {William H. Greene}, year = 1997, title = {Econometric Analysis}, edition = {3rd}, publisher = {Prentice-Hall}, address = {New Jersey

I found the following strange behavior using qnorm() and pnorm(): > x<-8.21;x-qnorm(pnorm(x)) [1] 0.0004638484 > x<-8.22;x-qnorm(pnorm(x)) [1] 0.01046385 > x<-8.23;x-qnorm(pnorm(x)) [1] 0.02046385 > x<-8.24;x-qnorm(pnorm(x)) [1] 0.03046385 > x<-8.25;x-qnorm(pnorm(x)) [1] 0.04046385 > x<-8.26;x-qnorm(pnorm(x)) [1] 0.05046385 > x<-8.27;x-qnorm(pnorm(x))

Hi Timo, checking my new userdb-checkpassword back end is stumbled across the fact, that the new shared namespace definitions possible in dovecot stop deliver from working. The log says: Oct 15 14:37:43 burlywood3 <info> deliver(2 at burlywood3.rgb)[24502]: Namespace: type=shared, prefix=users/%%u/, sep=/, inbox=no, hidden=no, list=no, subscriptions=no Oct 15 14:37:43 burlywood3

Hi *, I stumbled across a small bug (missing feature?) in the new shared name space stuff: a001 list "" "*" * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "user" * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "user/bob at example.com" * LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "INBOX" * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "INBOX/bar" * LIST