similar to: cross compile dovecot for armv5t fails

Hi. I'm trying to cross compile dovecot. My desktop machine is an AMD64 box with bells and whistles. The ARM based machine is a network attached storage box. When I run "make" always get x86_64 binaries. My OS is Gentoo, so I have been able to build using emerge a variety of other programs from source. What am I doing wrong here. (Gentoo doesn't have Dovecot for the arm) I

I am trying to build a static version of ssh, sshd and sftp, but after banging my head against the wall for the best part of the last 3 days I am about to give up... Since I plan to use this on an embedded device (building dropbear is *NOT* an option!), I've excluded as many openssh configure options as I can but, ultimately, failed. This is my setup: export LDFLAGS=' -pie -z relro -z

2008/12/28 Keun Soo Yim <yim6 at illinois.edu> > This is a simple question about building ARM cross-compiler. > What is the building procedure using LLVM 2.4 and GCC front-end 4.2? > > I used these commands for LLVM, and it is okay. > > $ ../configure --prefix=/usr/local -target=arm > $ make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=0 > $ make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=0 install > > Then

Can someone with llvm-gcc/ARM expertise (Dale?) please review Sandeep's patch? The patch works for me in building an LLVM-based cross-compiler from x86_64/Linux to ARM/Linux. I have been able to build without the patch to the asm file, but several people have reported needing the asm patch on http://llvm.org/PR2545 . On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Sandeep Patel <deeppatel1987 at

Hi Xerxes, > 4. softfloat related errors > http://labb.zafena.se/shark-testing/llvmARMCodeGenFailures200904/softenfloat_Do_not_know_how_to_soften_the_result_of_this_operator/ > example: > > root at overo:/home/xerxes/llvm-test/fail/CodeGen/softenfloat# llvm-as < 2007-11-19-VectorSplitting.ll | llc > SoftenFloatResult #0: 0x614e00: f32 = undef > llc:

Duncan Sands skrev: > Hi Xerxes, > > >> 4. softfloat related errors >> http://labb.zafena.se/shark-testing/llvmARMCodeGenFailures200904/softenfloat_Do_not_know_how_to_soften_the_result_of_this_operator/ >> example: >> >> root at overo:/home/xerxes/llvm-test/fail/CodeGen/softenfloat# llvm-as < 2007-11-19-VectorSplitting.ll | llc >>

Attached is the patch I've been building arm-eabi with, which might help with linux-gnueabi. I disable multilib to get around several bugs with thumb. I build cross binutils first, then llvm, then llvm-gcc with newlib merged in. The following bugs need to be addressed for these non-Darwin ARM targets: 1388 2313 2545 2985 deep On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Misha Brukman <brukman at

Hello Evan and Robert I have been investigating the unexpected test failures from the ARM nightly builders in order to get a better picture why the ARM backend don't pass the whole testsuite: I have run the failing tests manually on my arm board and can now categorize most of the thirteen unexpected CodeGen failures in four categories: 1. llvm don't lower MVT::i64 properly on arm

Hey, RELENG_7 isn't -STABLE yet, so the issue mention in the commit mail beolow will not get a Security Advisory. This only affects applications using DTLS, and I doubt there are many of those, but users should still upgrade to get this fix, just in case. See the OpenSSL advisory for some more details: http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20071012.txt If anybody were wondering, and

Hey, RELENG_7 isn't -STABLE yet, so the issue mention in the commit mail beolow will not get a Security Advisory. This only affects applications using DTLS, and I doubt there are many of those, but users should still upgrade to get this fix, just in case. See the OpenSSL advisory for some more details: http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20071012.txt If anybody were wondering, and

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 6:17 AM, Dietmar Ebner <ebner at complang.tuwien.ac.at>wrote: > On Mar 11, 2009, at 9:44 PM, Misha Brukman wrote: > > The problem I've had is building an LLVM cross-compiler from Linux/ > > x86 to Linux/ARM (as has another llvm-dev poster). Someone > > mentioned to me off-list that he managed to get it to build, but I > > haven't

On Mar 18, 2009, at 11:30 AMPDT, Misha Brukman wrote: > Can someone with llvm-gcc/ARM expertise (Dale?) please review > Sandeep's patch? The patch works for me in building an LLVM-based > cross-compiler from x86_64/Linux to ARM/Linux. > I have been able to build without the patch to the asm file, but > several people have reported needing the asm patch on

Hi Sorry, the reason I joined the list is for help finding a bug that occurs when libvorbisenc is compiled and run on ARM EABI systems (current Debian, Gentoo, OpenEmbedded etc). The symptom is that oggenc produces shorter ogg files than it should (about 1/2 size) that decode to the correct duration but of total silence. libvorbis/examples/encoder_example does the same on these systems, but

On Thursday 04 October 2007 04:27:47 you wrote: > Sir, you need to provide more information. What kind of errors? What > is not working? What exactly are you trying to do? What compiler are > you using? H IV0, we are using a lot of different cross-compiler (mainly based on GCC 3.4.x) When I tried to cross-compile FLAC for non-i386 platforms (such as ARM), I use use

Dear all, I have a problem while compiling the ARM assembly file produced by LLVM arm backend (llc)。 The commands I did are .. llc -march=arm printf.bc -o printf.arm.s arm-softfloat-linux-gnu-as printf.arm.s -o printf.arm.o arm-softfloat-linux-gnu-ld --dynamic-linker /home/toolchain/arm-softfloat-linux-gnu/distributed/arm-softfloat-linux-gnu/lib/ld-2.3.5.so

On Mar 11, 2009, at 9:44 PM, Misha Brukman wrote: > The problem I've had is building an LLVM cross-compiler from Linux/ > x86 to Linux/ARM (as has another llvm-dev poster). Someone > mentioned to me off-list that he managed to get it to build, but I > haven't been able to reproduce the build using his instructions > (I'll post my results in another thread).

hi, i've got some more things to note. first, the issue is not related to x86_64 being the host machine - it also happens on i686/linux. next, i think (one of) the problem(s) is the use of [HOST_]WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN instead of [HOST_]FLOAT_WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN in llvm-convert.cpp (see patch below). this fixes single precision floating point but breaks double precision. for

hi, Dale Johannesen wrote: > On Oct 19, 2007, at 7:23 AM, Dietmar Ebner wrote: >> i'm trying to make some experiments with the ARM backend (llvm 2.1) >> and >> therefore built an arm-softfloat-linux-gnu toolchain on x86_64 linux. >> >> however, the llvm-gcc frontend seems to cause troubles with single >> precision floating point values, i.e., they are

Hi Rafael, As you mentioned in the bug, we should only apply this change when hard-float is set, which it is by default on armv7a, I presume. >From that part of the code, I can infer that by the time "MaxAtomicPromoteWidth = 64;", the variable SoftFloat is not properly set, so a simple "if (!SoftFloat)" won't cut in there. It seems SoftFloat is being set on

On a headless C7 server (actually a pogoplug with the Redsleeve 7 distro), I have a usb attached backup drive (what other type of drives can you have on a pogoplug other than usb? :) ). I had reformated the partition as ext4: # parted /dev/sdb print Model: WD My Book 1230 (scsi) Disk /dev/sdb: 3001GB Sector size (logical/physical): 4096B/4096B Partition Table: msdos Disk Flags: Number Start