similar to: exceeds the global size limit

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "exceeds the global size limit"

2009 Mar 06
1
dovecot's deliver rejection mechanism(sendmail) alvernatives?
dear all, quickie - is possible(if yes - how, params, directives, etc) to use any alternative to sendmail_path = /usr/lib/sendmail is is configurable at all? like having postfix or anything else? regards
2009 May 19
1
what is deliver(1.1.10) doing in /tmp
dear all, first part of log snippet is to show a bit of contrast, to me it's peculiar situation it's about messages between local users, actually one user, when I use command line mailx or anther local account to send to A_local user - ok second part is this weir error, it's selinux which prevents deliver write to /tmp, I believe thsese messages are from A_local user cron jobs(to
2007 Sep 21
4
ZFS (and quota)
I''m CCing zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org, as this doesn''t look like FreeBSD-specific problem. It looks there is a problem with block allocation(?) when we are near quota limit. tank/foo dataset has quota set to 10m: Without quota: FreeBSD: # dd if=/dev/zero of=/tank/test bs=512 count=20480 time: 0.7s Solaris: # dd if=/dev/zero of=/tank/test bs=512 count=20480 time: 4.5s
2012 Aug 06
2
redirect actions exceeds policy limit
Hello, We have a vacation/mail forwarder plugin in squirrel mail that allows customers to forward email. It has come to my attention that there is a limit (appears to be 5) on the number of addresses that can be specified. I'm now trying to track down where this policy limit is set. This is the error we see in the customers .dovecot.sieve.log file: main_script: line 26: error: number of
2005 Jan 11
1
how to limit the size of a samba 3 share?
Hello Samba list, I have a customer that really needs to have its Samba shares hard-limited to a certain size. We migrated them from Novell Netware 5 to Whitebox Enterprise Linux 3 with Samba 3 with LDAP backend. We've set UNIX acls on the share folders and subfolders, since they have specific wishes that cannot be covered with standard permissions (multiple groups should be able to read
2017 Sep 25
3
Quota - frustrated trying to configure ...
On 25.09.2017 20:28, Sami Ketola wrote: >> On 25 Sep 2017, at 21.19, Garry Glendown <garry at glendown.de> wrote: >> >> doveadm(root): Error: chdir(/root/) failed: Permission denied >> (euid=479(dovecot) egid=478(dovecot) missing +x perm: /root, dir owned >> by 0:0 mode=0700) >> doveadm(root): Error: chdir(/root) failed: Permission denied >> >>
2015 Jan 22
1
"error: number of redirect actions exceeds policy limit"
Greetings, after testing a lot with my system I have to write to this list to ask for help from the cummunity. My system: * Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS * Dovecot 2.0.19 * Dovecot config (extract) ????? 8< ????? plugin { sieve = ~/.dovecot.sieve sieve_dir = ~/sieve sieve_max_redirects = 10 } ????? >8?????? * Sieve filter rules ????? 8< ????? require ["copy"]; # rule:[Alles
2013 Sep 16
0
[PATCH 1/1] core: Check if ldlinux.sys exceeds the limit at its building time.
Peter, does this look OK to you? Raphael, I can't work out why ADV_SIZE is a constant in this file? On Sat, 31 Aug, at 05:01:20PM, Raphael S.Carvalho wrote: > Calc the size of ldlinux.sys from ldlinux.bin, and check if it exceeds the limit. > ldlinux.sys must fit between the bootsector and two copies of ADV whose size may vary. > Thus, the size of ldlinux.sys (limit) can be at most:
2013 Sep 16
2
[PATCH 1/1] core: Check if ldlinux.sys exceeds the limit at its building time.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Matt Fleming <matt at console-pimps.org> wrote: > Peter, does this look OK to you? > > Raphael, I can't work out why ADV_SIZE is a constant in this file? Matt, ADV_SIZE is currently a constant value, but it may change in the future. So it would need some care. Regards, Raphael S. Carvalho
2013 Sep 16
0
[PATCH 1/1] core: Check if ldlinux.sys exceeds the limit at its building time.
We probably will need to increase out to 4K because of newer drives. Raphael S Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> wrote: >On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Matt Fleming <matt at console-pimps.org> >wrote: >> Peter, does this look OK to you? >> >> Raphael, I can't work out why ADV_SIZE is a constant in this file? > >Matt, ADV_SIZE is currently a
2013 Sep 16
1
[PATCH 1/1] core: Check if ldlinux.sys exceeds the limit at its building time.
On Mon, 16 Sep, at 09:49:01AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > We probably will need to increase out to 4K because of newer drives. Raphael, is there any way we could extract the ADV_SIZE value from libinstaller/setadv.h and pass it to ldlinux_limit.pl? That would allow things to keep working in future when we do upgrade to 4K. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
2014 May 26
0
[PATCH 1/1] core: Check if ldlinux.sys exceeds the limit at its building time.
Hi Genec, On Sun, May 25, 2014 11:27 am, Gene Cumm wrote: > Raphael/Paulo: does UFS2 have a hard 64kiB limit? I know it's not > installed to the first sector where the first superblock is located. I have no much experience with UFS2 filesystem. I've just took a quick look at its internals and I can see that UFS2 places its superblock at either 64KiB or 256KiB (depending on the
2014 May 27
0
[PATCH 1/1] core: Check if ldlinux.sys exceeds the limit at its building time.
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > Raphael/Paulo: does UFS2 have a hard 64kiB limit? I know it's not installed > to the first sector where the first superblock is located. Momentarily confused UFS2 and the madness of XFS putting its superblock into sector 0, rendering it unusable for typical boot purposes. -- -Gene
2014 Jun 05
1
IMAP copy fails because the mailbox size of user1 is exceeding the quota limit of user2??
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 4 Jun 2014, Katja Wegner wrote: > Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 16:21:04 +0200 > From: Katja Wegner <katja.wegner92 at web.de> > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > Subject: [Dovecot] IMAP copy fails because the mailbox size of user1 is > exceeding the quota limit of user2?? > > Hi all, > I do have a mailbox-quota problem
2014 May 25
0
[PATCH 1/1] core: Check if ldlinux.sys exceeds the limit at its building time.
While going throug old posts found: Op 2013-08-31 om 17:01 schreef Raphael S.Carvalho: > Calc the size of ldlinux.sys from ldlinux.bin, and check if it exceeds the limit. > ldlinux.sys must fit between the bootsector and two copies of ADV whose size may vary. > Thus, the size of ldlinux.sys (limit) can be at most: 65536 - 2 * ADV_SIZE - 512. > > Certain file systems (such as BTRFS
2010 Jun 23
6
LMTP SIZE Option
Hi Timo, Are there any plans to support the SIZE option in the lmtp server? Paul
2012 May 18
1
Override old e-mails with new e-mails after exceeding Maildir size limit
Hi, Is it possible to set Dovecot to write new e-mails in the place of the oldest e-mails, when there is no storage left in the Maildir? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Override-old-e-mails-with-new-e-mails-after-exceeding-Maildir-size-limit-tp33871372p33871372.html Sent from the Dovecot mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2014 May 25
4
[PATCH 1/1] core: Check if ldlinux.sys exceeds the limit at its building time.
On May 25, 2014 3:39 AM, "Geert Stappers" <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > > > While going throug old posts found: > > Op 2013-08-31 om 17:01 schreef Raphael S.Carvalho: > > Calc the size of ldlinux.sys from ldlinux.bin, and check if it exceeds the limit. > > ldlinux.sys must fit between the bootsector and two copies of ADV whose size may vary. >
2006 Aug 29
0
MODWT exceeds sample size
Hello, I get the following message when I try to load a time series of 128 stock returns. Error in modwt(stock, wf = "la8", n.levels = 8, boundary = "periodic") : wavelet transform exceeds sample size in modwt I thought that MODWT had no restrictions on the sample size? Any help? -- View this message in context:
2009 Apr 27
0
[Fwd: Re: [Pine-info] "incomplete SecBuffer exceeds maximum buffer size" ?]
Forgive me if I've been asleep at the switch on the SSL problem and it's already been figured out, but....could this be what the prob is? -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Pine-info] "incomplete SecBuffer exceeds maximum buffer size" ? Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:47:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Steve Hubert <hubert at washington.edu> Organization: Univ of