Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Extra_fields / first check userdb?"
2003 Feb 25
2
Samba using Virtual Servers (load balancing)
Hello fellow samba users,
Our company uses samba for all fileshares/printing/PDC on
two SUN E3500's. We like to replace these with about 10
Linux 19" XEON (pizza)boxes. The question: Are there
any implementation out there using a loadbalancing cluster
doing samba?
A simple diagram of the setup I have in mind:
Users (+/- 500)
|||
Headnode(Director 1) - Headnode (Director 2)
|
Worknode -
2007 Aug 21
2
userdb override?
Hi,
I used to change the mailbox root for some users using a custom userdb
file which contains lines like:
doe::20000:200::/u/doe::userdb_mail=mbox:/u/doe/Mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u
The logfiles shows the mail location stays default ( rc15 worked ):
---
dovecot: Aug 21 09:43:49 Info: auth(default): master out: USER 250
doe system_user=doe uid=20324 gid=200 home=/u/doe
dovecot: Aug
2008 Oct 13
1
Get an extra_field in login process
Hi.
I have an auth plugin where an extra_field is filled. Somewhere, in login
process I need to log the authentication command and the extra_field, I was
trying to do it in login-common/client-common.c, adding a new variable to
login_log_format_elements and trying to get the fileld from environment,
but, I could not find any way to do it, the getenv returns null everytime.
Anyone can suggest
2012 Jun 24
3
Additional passdb result status
Dear Dovecot-Team,
I am implementing a plugin (for the pop3/imap process) that requires
some data to provided from the authentication phase (a derivative of the
password). For that, I have now implemented a passdb plugin that
generates this data and I would like to "pass" this data down to the
mail process (pop3/imap) via extra_fields in the reply of the
authentication. The general idea
2006 Dec 17
1
Proxy with MasterUser + Authentication issues
Per Timo's direction, I decided to give the MasterUser a try in connecting
my proxy to my destination server.
This might allow for the use of 'secure password' for my clients that like
to check that box by default.
A couple of problems I'm running into running RC15:
#1: My Proxy's SQL password_query line:
password_query = SELECT a.clearpasswd AS password, v.storeIP AS host,
2005 Mar 15
2
Read-only mail folders
Is it possible to have folders on read-only partitions in Dovecot
1.0-stable?
We have a NetApp fileserver which would probably be accessed via NFS
(though iSCSI is possible) and which stores readonly "snapshots" of
every directory accessible as .snapshot (but usually hidden from the
operating system). It would be very nice to set up a "snapshot"
namespace something like
2003 Jan 06
1
Samba PDC with windows XP
Hello Samba Team,
happy new year for all Samba Warriors .... all best wish for new year.
I come to you for one question :
Does Samba PDC work fine with Windows XP ???
i use the same config, but Samba PDC works only fine with WIn98 ...and not
Win XP ...
Can you give me an example of PDC config for client XP ??
Or can you tell me the release of samba that work fine for Win XP ?? i test
2.2.7
2008 Jun 19
3
Compile failure on Dovecot 1.1-rc12
I am getting this failure when trying to compile dovecot on Sparc Solaris 8:
make[4]: Entering directory
`/home/systems/looneytr/dovecot-1.1.rc12/src/lib'
source='str-find.c' object='str-find.o' libtool=no \
DEPDIR=.deps depmode=gcc /bin/bash ../../depcomp \
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I/usr/local/openssl/include -g
-O2 -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes
2006 Nov 24
1
Thanks! Migration UWimap -> Dovecot report
Best Dovecot devs,
We moved from UW-imap&pop3 to Dovecot this morning (~500 accounts) and
reduced our traffic from the home directory server to the imap server
bigtime:
| 22 Nov| 0.1 0.8| 0.0 0.0| 0.4 0.5| 1550.6
42.9| 1557.3 67.9|
| 23 Nov| 0.3 1.0| 0.0 0.1| 0.4 0.6| 1331.8
37.3| 1337.2 46.3|
| 24 Nov| 0.0 0.4| 0.0 0.0|
2006 Nov 29
1
Can't remove folder
Hello,
Here is a 'me too' somewhat like:
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2006-January/010759.html
Example scenario:
/u/username/Mail/subfolder/somebox
subfolder is a directory
somebox is a mbox
When I use Thunderbird's "Delete folder" function on the somebox the
message appears:
"Target mailbox doesn't allow inferiour mailboxes".
Thunderbird, by
2005 Nov 20
1
Lots of "write_data: write failure in writing to client" and "Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1"
Last week we installed Samba 3.0.20b on one of our servers, worked fine and
does it's job well. But today the load was rising due two smbd processes
taking up all cputime. While looking for hints on what was going on the
logfiles show two types of errors (I don't know at this time if it has
anything to do with the load spike):
lib/util_sock.c:write_data(554)
write_data: write failure in
2005 May 05
1
1.0-stable loses flag changes sometimes?
I've been struggling with an odd bug in the latest 1.0-stable
(20050427) release. Sometimes Dovecot seems to forget that a message
has been read or deleted and marks it unread (or not deleted).
As far as I've been able to determine, it seems to happen when
1) There have been several recent deliveries
2) Possibly some of those deliveries are of multiple messages
3) Possibly they are read
2015 Aug 06
3
question on autch cache parameters
hi timo,
I checked out the commit causing this.
its this one:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/diff/5e445c659f89/src/auth/auth-request.c#l1.32
if I move this block back as it was. everything is fine
diff -r a46620d6e0ff -r 5e445c659f89 src/auth/auth-request.c
--- a/src/auth/auth-request.c Tue May 05 13:35:52 2015 +0300
+++ b/src/auth/auth-request.c Tue May 05 14:16:31 2015 +0300
@@ -618,30
2003 Mar 18
4
Performance Increase Suggestions
Hello Everyone,
I have a few users that are complaining about the "slowness" of
copying files to and saving files directly to the Samba server. From my
own recollections, the speed is rather identical to the speed we
experienced on our old Windows NT 4.0 fileserver.
One thing that could be the impetus of this issue is that Samba
is serving up files, for opening and copying from the
2006 Jan 14
2
20060114 snapshot compilation warnings
Timo,
I've noticed a couple of extra compilation errors in last night's
snapshot compared to the snapshot I downloaded on Tuesday, probably due
to the int -> bool change :- (gcc 3.3.2 on Solaris 8)
mbox-sync.c: In function `mbox_sync':
mbox-sync.c:1568: warning: comparison is always false due to limited
range of data type
index-search.c: In function `search_index_arg':
2005 Mar 17
1
Namespaces and subscriptions
I've got a problem with subscriptions in 1.0-stable when migrating from
UW-IMAP.
I've modified the SUBSCRIPTION_FILE_NAME entries as suggested in the
Wiki http://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration and included the "~/mail/" etc.
hidden namespaces.
The .mailboxlist files contain entries like "~/mail/somefolder" and the
clients have "~/mail/" set as a prefix.
In
2005 Mar 22
2
Address with whitespace shows as ""@MISSING_DOMAIN
It seems that Dovecot gets confused when presented with a header like:
From: someone at somewhere.org
i.e. with leading whitespace and no "friendly name"
This shows up as ""@MISSING_DOMAIN in clients, such as Pine, that
believe what Dovecot tells them rather than parsing the headers
themselves (e.g. Thunderbird).
Here's a sample IMAP session:
xyz FETCH 728 ENVELOPE
2005 May 27
2
imap disconnects on my account only
Talk about personal problems!
I am using dovecot-0.99.13-4.FC2, and everything has been going fine
for months. Earlier this afternoon, Thunderbird's status pane would
say 'Sending authenticate login information...' and I would no longer
receive email.
When I checked with others, they were fine and dandy.
I tried kmail, evolution, and even tried webmail. All had connection errors.
2005 Sep 21
1
Another address-spec problem
I've had complaints from users about "MISSING_DOMAIN" in header fields
and I've tracked it down to having "." in an unquoted display name.
By my reading of RFC2822 (especially section 4.1)
A N Other <a.n.other at somewhere.org>
"A. N. Other" <a.n.other at somewhere.org>
are legal, but
A. N. Other <a.n.other at somewhere.org>
is
2005 Jun 14
3
dovecot.index.cache 1/3rd of INBOX size
I've noticed that my dovecot.index.cache file has got very large (24MB,
which is more than 1/3 of my INBOX size). I've tried deleting (well,
renaming) the dovecot.index.* files, and re-opening my INBOX, and the
new dovecot.index.cache is only 90KB so far.
I'm using dovecot-1.0-stable and mbox format. My mail_cache_fields and
mail_never_cache_fields are set to the default.
Looking