similar to: Problem with rc10, perhaps 11-15

I just upgraded our test server from rc6 to rc10... ISSUE #1 I noticed that we no longer are getting two "From_" lines. However, the one that was good (had the original sender e-mail address) is now gone. The one with "dovecot.deliver" remains. I attempted to add "-d test" to the mailbox_command line in main.cf as follows: mailbox_command =

After recently adding the -f parameter to the call to the deliver command which is called by Postfix, I found that e-mail with a null return path (MAIL FROM:<>) was causing Dovecot deliver to SEGFAULT. I verified this by making this patch to deliver.c (notice I fixed a typo here, too): *** deliver.c.orig Fri Oct 13 07:32:28 2006 --- deliver.c Fri Oct 27 21:26:08 2006 ***************

Dovecot version: 1.0-0_33.rc15 built by atrpms Operating system: Redhat EL4 CPU architecture: x86 Filesystem you used: mailboxs via nfs to fileserver using xfs Just upgraded from 1.0-0_20.rc7 to 1.0-0_33.rc15 built by atrpms and we had previously set mbox_min_index_size to 1024 (1Mb) and now all mailboxes (mbox format) that are under this size are not able to be opened and throw an "Internal

I hate to be a pest, but are there any revelations on file descriptor "overusage" by dovecot-auth? ----- Forwarded message from Steven F Siirila <sfs at tc.umn.edu> ----- Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 12:42:50 -0600 From: Steven F Siirila <sfs at tc.umn.edu> To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-auth file

I am re-posting this message from last Friday, as I have seen no replies. It is critical that we address this problem, since until then we cannot put more than a few hundred users on our server. If Dovecot-auth TRULY needs to keep open a file descriptor for every single login session, we will have to start looking at alternatives. In short: Help! ----- Forwarded message from Steven F Siirila

In trying to determine why someone was unable to use port 110 w/STLS (POP) I had great difficulty finding the session in which the user switched to this port from using port 995. This is because Dovecot does not log any port number information. Furthermore, it isn't obvious to me if it logs whether a session was negotiated SSL (via STARTTLS w/IMAP or STLS w/POP) or started out SSL (ports 993

I am having difficulting getting to www.dovecot.org and wiki.dovecot.org. My browser tells me it can't find them. Anyone know what's up? -- Steven F. Siirila Office: Lind Hall, Room 130B Internet Services E-mail: sfs at umn.edu Office of Information Technology Voice: (612) 626-0244 University of Minnesota Fax: (612) 626-7593

I am having a problem setting up a server to handle e-mail in a way in which it had always done traditionally, but with Postfix+Dovecot LDA. Here's a rundown... Solaris 9 Postfix 2.3.3 Dovecot 1.0.rc10 Postfix non-defaults (postconf -n): alias_maps = dbm:/etc/mail/aliases command_directory = /opt/postfix/sbin config_directory = /etc/opt/postfix daemon_directory = /opt/postfix/libexec

A few RC releases ago we had a problem where a user's restored home directory contained a .imap folder either from a previous RC release or perhaps it was a different server. In any event, restoration of the user caused problems since Dovecot choked on the restored .imap index files. Removing those index files cleared the problem. I'm wondering if this is still an issue, and therefore

We are running Dovecot 1.0-rc15 on Solaris 10 and are starting to ramp up our user count and ran into a file descriptor limit: Jan 1 19:38:54 <hostname> dovecot: IMAP(username): Newly created index file is corrupted: /home/username/.imap/foldername/dovecot.index.tmp Jan 1 19:38:54 <hostname> dovecot: IMAP(username): file mail-index.c: line 1806 (mail_index_move_to_memory): assertion

Under Dovecot 1.0-rc27 on Solaris 10 we noticed this error today affecting one of our users repeatedly: Mar 28 14:02:01 myhost dovecot: IMAP(myuser): file mbox-sync-rewrite.c: line 423 (mbox_sync_read_and_move): assertion failed: (need_space == (uoff_t)-mails[idx].space) Mar 28 14:02:01 myhost dovecot: IMAP(myuser): Raw backtrace: 0x7ac54 -> 0x42cd4 -> 0x3e968 -> 0x3f54c -> 0x3f980

Anyone running Dovecot on Solaris, requiring only SSL connections, and servicing thousands of simultaneous users? Our past attempts to do so have failed due to dovecot-auth using up all 256 of its file descriptors. I say 256 since we are limited to that by the 32-bit libraries. We are looking at either compiling Dovecot in 64-bit and letting dovecot-auth file descriptors accumulate (not ideal),

For those running Dovecot on Solaris, what are your positive/negative experiences with building the software with CC vs. GCC? We are currently letting ./configure find our gcc and build with it, but wondered if anyone has any experience with Sun CC (does it even compile, for example). -- Steven F. Siirila Office: Lind Hall, Room 130B Internet Services E-mail: sfs at umn.edu Office of

Okay, to convince myself that quota handling was working okay with Dovecot 1.0-rc27 on Solaris 10, I tested sending a message to an account that was purposely over-quota. The account in question had a vacation message set up. For the first test, there was no $HOME/.imap directory at all. I received the vacation message, but the message which was supposed to be delivered locally queued in Postfix

On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 10:25:53PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 21:00 -0500, Steven F Siirila wrote: > > I am running Dovecot 1.0-rc6 along with dovecot-sieve from 2006-10-05 CVS. > > I am calling dovecot deliver from Postfix (main.cf): > > > > mailbox_command = /opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver > > > > Upon switching to dovecot

We are running Postfix 2.3.3 and Dovecot 1.0-RC27 on a Solaris 10 server. We use the Dovecot LDA for local delivery. Problems arise with looping mail whenever a user's .forward contains a reference to themselves. This most frequently occurs when a user sets up a vacation since it then puts this in their .forward file: \username, "|/usr/bin/vacation username" The vacation program

For lack of a better name, we are interested in a feature where one could get a notice out to all Dovecot users as quickly as possible, possibly without going through an MTA even. Given a message and a list of userids we could certainly do a mailing on the MDA server itself going through both Postfix and Dovecot LDA. However, we were wondering what other options we might have in Dovecot. For

I am doing some testing with Dovecot and wondered if it was normal for the deliver program to create index files for an Inbox (the test Inbox is over 7MB), but to not update the index files after the initial creation, even though messages continue to come into the mailbox. Note that during this testing, no IMAP or POP accesses are being made. Would it matter if a command-line program such as

When I configure Dovecot to conform to our directory hierarchy, it insists on adding 'dovecot/' to the prefixes I specify. Is there any way to inhibit this? My configure command is: ./configure --prefix=/opt/dovecot --sysconfdir=/etc/opt/dovecot \ --libexecdir=/opt/dovecot/libexec --localstatedir=/var/opt/dovecot \ --without-sql-drivers --with-ssl=openssl \

After upgrading a test server from rc15 to rc16, Postfix was no longer able to deliver mail via Dovecot deliver: Jan 5 11:00:59 testhost postfix/local[8873]: 497282EFE: to=<testuser at testhost>, relay=local, delay=1.2, delays=0.13/0.02/0/1, dsn=5.3.0, status=bounced (Command died with status 89: "/opt/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver -f "$SENDER"") Should "status